PPT-Chapter 15 Product Liability

Brad Curry Mark Medlyn Number of product accidents estimated to be 50 million per year Cost of 50 billion dollars Lawsuits filed as a result of faulty design Ford Pinto gas tanka 1000 repair was turned down for cost . Air & Waste Management Association. Southern Section. Annual Meeting & Technical Conference. Callaway Gardens. Augus. t 20, 2015. Steven Burns. Question: . Why does this matter?. Answer:. $ $ $. Protect Yourself and. Protect Your Business. Kenneth Odza, Esq.. Focus is on the . product. , not fault or lack of care. Strict Liability. Anyone “engaged in the business of selling or otherwise distributing” the defective food product.. Chapter . 12. Express Warranties. A seller’s or lessor’s oral or written promise in connection with a sales or lease agreement, as to the quality, description, or performance of the goods being sold or leased.. CLU3M: Civil . Law. Special Types of Liability. Negligence is the broad term for any type of tort law. Within negligence are various types of liability, each of which have their own standards of care and in some cases their own legislation. Under the law of negligence there are several special types of liability. In these groups are subject to different rules:. Manufacturers. Property owners. People who serve alcohol. Car and pet owners. Product Liability. 1. Learning Objectives. What factors determine whether a Seller’s or Lessor’s statement constitutes an express warranty or mere . puffery. ?. What implied warranties under the UCC?. Jennifer Sawayda. Program Specialist. Anderson School of Management. University of New Mexico. Albuquerque, NM. Before We Begin….. It is a mistake to think that product safety is only a concern in manufacturing. In fact, advertisers, salespeople, suppliers, manufacturers, and anyone else who occupies a marketing function should make product safety a high priority. . DONALD PATRICK ECKLER. PRETZEL & STOUFFER, CHARTERED. CBA YLS TORT LITIGATION COMMITTEE. NOVEMBER 18, 2011. THREE CASES THAT MOVE ILLINOIS PRODUCT LIABILITY FORWARD. Jablonski . v. Ford Motor Company. DONALD PATRICK ECKLER. PRETZEL & STOUFFER, CHARTERED. CBA YLS TORT LITIGATION COMMITTEE. NOVEMBER 18, 2011. THREE CASES THAT MOVE ILLINOIS PRODUCT LIABILITY FORWARD. Jablonski . v. Ford Motor Company. and Product Liability. Clarkson . . Miller . . Cross. §1: . Strict Liability. Development of Strict Liability.. Theory of strict liability started with . Rylands v. Fletcher. (1868 England).. “The people’s university”. -- Dr. Mark Keenum. MGT 3323. Entrepreneurship. Daniel T. Holt. Assistant Professor of Management. Administrative Issues. Financial Feasibility . Analyses—DUE TODAY. Schoolof EconomicsZhejiang University of Finance and EconomicsRoom209 Building 618 Xueyuan Street JiangganHangzhou 310018 China86136-3417-9947wxhtony163comwangxhzufeeducnRESEARCH INTERESTGame Theory C 875 Summit AvenueSt Paul Minnesota55105wwwpublichealthlawcenterorgLiability for Foodborne Illness InjuryRoughly one in six individuals in the United States become sick each year as a result of foodb turnaround time This enables customers to compete successfully for these growing classes of businessprofessional lines highlight sheetAllied Healthcare Professional and General LiabilityOur product ta