PPT-The Simple Economics of Affirmative

Action Policies Glenn C Loury Univ of Michigan March 11 2012 This Lecture Will Consist of Two Parts A discussion of some of the general questions or themes that arise in the context of debates about affirmative action policies as well as a brief review of my prior research on this topic. Agencies should note that the FAR also addresses affirmative procurement programs See 62 FR 44809 August 22 1997 Within 1 year after EPA designates an item RCRA Section 6002i requires each procuring agency purchasing more than 10000 of that item or brPage 1br Reflexive Simple Simple Simple Reflexive Extra Action Supplemental Simple Exalted Exalted The DragonBlooded brPage 2br Exalted Exalted Players Guide Supplemental Simple Extra CODI 2014 Lecture 1. Basics of a Policy Affirmative Case. Stock Issues. Significance. Harms. Inherency. Topicality. Solvency. Significance and Harms. How big is the problem?. How bad will things be if we don’t do anything about it?. What is Affirmative Action? Affirmative action is a program required of federal contractors to ensure equal employment opportunity. It requires good faith effort What is Unlawful Discrimination? Unlaw Matthew N. Gaertner. University of Colorado at Boulder. Today’s Presentation. Why?. Review policy climate and ballot initiatives that motivate this research. How?. Introduce class-based affirmative action at the University of Colorado – Boulder. A debate is, basically, an argument. That is not to say that it is an undisciplined shouting match between parties that passionately believe in a particular point of view. In fact the opposite is true. Debating has strict rules of conduct and quite sophisticated arguing techniques and you will often be in a position where you will have to argue the opposite of what you believe in.. ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES. Affirmative . vs. negative. Remember…. The . job of the affirmative is to prove that their proposal (which must fit under the resolution) is a good idea.. The job of the negative is to prove that the affirmative proposal is either a bad idea or does not fit under the resolution.. Ways for the Negative to Win. Take out a stock issue: inherency, harms, solvency, or topicality. . Take out all advantages of the affirmative case, proving that the affirmative can not provide a comparative advantage over the status quo.. Overview. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is . a  . VALUE. debate, meaning it is a debate about what . ought to be . rather than specific policy.  . It is usually a topic regarding the conflict . of rights or moral obligations. By Rodney Walker . Sociology 2630 Summer 2014 Deidre Tyler. 1. Table of Contents. Pg3 Reflection . Page: What I Already Knew. Pg4 Undergraduate . Research Journal for Human Sciences. Pg5 Journal . of Policy Analysis and Management. Evaluating AA. L.O. to develop an understanding of AA.. AA. Legislation for AA. Republican views. Democrat views. Impact. Legislation AGAINST AA. Legislation for AA. JFK – Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – federal fyund3ed projects had to use AA. © 2015, Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles. The Purpose of Affirmative Action What is affirmative action? What is the purpose of affirmative action programs at public universities ? Denville Township . School. Valleyview, Lakeview, Riverview. Denville, NJ 07834. Who does affirmative . action protect?. Teachers. Administrators. Secretaries. Custodians. Support Staff. Students. Everyone is protected!. . is a. . civilized. . argument to decide which policy option should be adopted.. About what?. The . resolution. …. Resolved:. . The United States federal government should substantially increase its funding and/or regulation of elementary and/or secondary education in the United States..