PPT-The Affirmative Policy debate
Author : clara | Published Date : 2024-07-08
is a civilized argument to decide which policy option should be adopted About what The resolution Resolved The United States federal government should substantially
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Affirmative Policy debate" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
The Affirmative Policy debate: Transcript
is a civilized argument to decide which policy option should be adopted About what The resolution Resolved The United States federal government should substantially increase its funding andor regulation of elementary andor secondary education in the United States. A debate is, basically, an argument. That is not to say that it is an undisciplined shouting match between parties that passionately believe in a particular point of view. In fact the opposite is true. Debating has strict rules of conduct and quite sophisticated arguing techniques and you will often be in a position where you will have to argue the opposite of what you believe in.. Julian Erdmann. What is CX debate? . Team debate made up by two students from the same school.. They will defend either Affirmative or Negative. . Focuses more on policy-making and evidence. Basic Terms. ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES. Affirmative . vs. negative. Remember…. The . job of the affirmative is to prove that their proposal (which must fit under the resolution) is a good idea.. The job of the negative is to prove that the affirmative proposal is either a bad idea or does not fit under the resolution.. Topicality. A. Definition. Define the word (or phrase) the Affirmative is not topical under.. B. Violation. Explain why the Affirmative is not topical.. C. Standards . (. Neg. ). . Logical Standards: Eliminating vagueness . Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen!. 2. We can’t do this without you.. You are making an investment.. You are performing a teaching role in the . . lives of our students.. You make it possible for young people to. Overview. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is . a . VALUE. debate, meaning it is a debate about what . ought to be . rather than specific policy. . It is usually a topic regarding the conflict . of rights or moral obligations. Use the power point to help you study for the LD test.. Value Debate. In debate there are 3 types of propositions: propositions of fact, propositions of policy and propositions of value. Lincoln Douglas debate uses propositions of value.. Debate. The definition of a debate is a regulated discussion of a proposition by two matched sides. It provides reasoned arguments for and against a given proposition.. What can debate do for you? . It will improve your…. The Who.... Lincoln-Douglas Debaters. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen Douglas. One-on-One. Affirmative - 6 minute constructive, 4 minute rebuttal, 3 minute rebuttal. Negative - 7 minute constructive, 6 minute rebuttal. Action Policies. Glenn C. . Loury. Univ. of Michigan, March 11, 2012. This . Lecture Will Consist . of Two Parts:. A discussion of some of the general questions or themes that arise in the context of debates about affirmative action policies, as well as a brief review of my prior research on this topic.. New Optimistic Legacy of Achievers. Champaign Central High School. Champaign, . Illinois. Welcome and Introductions. DaNaya. . Burnett. : . founding . . member of . NOLA Debate Team; . freshman . @ SIU-E. To be music…. you must be able to understand the lyrics.. Standard. Rule. Test. Principle. Part One. LD Theory. . “Lincoln-Douglas debate provides excellent training for development of skills in . Chapter Outlines. Part One. WHAT IS DEBATE?. . Debate:. Formalized public speaking in which participants prepare and present speeches on opposite sides of an issue to determine which side has the strongest argument. . Glenn C. . Loury. , Brown University. Presidential Address. Eastern Economics Association . New York City, May 2013. AA = {concern about ‘race’} + {concern for ‘equality. ’ of groups} . + {need to ration access to elite positions}.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"The Affirmative Policy debate"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents