/
Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives

Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives - PowerPoint Presentation

calandra-battersby
calandra-battersby . @calandra-battersby
Follow
389 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-06

Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives - PPT Presentation

Lecture No 18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright 2016 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Projects Basic Terminologies Revenue Versus Service Projects Revenue Projects ID: 641003

service period project analysis period service analysis project projects required mutually exclusive alternatives investment npw time choice compute comparing span revenue case

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternative..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives

Lecture No

. 18

Chapter 5

Contemporary Engineering

Economics

Copyright ©

2016Slide2

Comparing Mutually Exclusive

Projects: Basic TerminologiesSlide3

Revenue Versus Service Projects

Revenue Projects

Service Projects

Project revenues depend on the choice of alternatives

Project revenues do not depend on the choice of alternatives

Revenue and cost streams vary with the choice of alternatives

Fixed (or constant) revenues for all alternativesSlide4

Analysis Period Versus Required Service Period

Analysis Period

The time span over which the economic effects of an investment will be

evaluated

(study period or planning horizon)

Required Service Period

The time span over which the service of equipment (or investment) will be

neededSlide5

Road Map: A Process of Making a Choice Among Mutually Exclusive AlternativesSlide6

Comparing Mutually Exclusive Projects

Principle

: Projects must be compared over an

equal time

span.

Rule of Thumb

: If the required service period is given, the

analysis period

should be the same as the

required service period

.Slide7

Case 1

Analysis Period Equals Project Lives

What to do

:

Compute the NPW for each project over its life and select the project with the largest NPW.Slide8

Comparing Projects Requiring Different Levels of Investment

Assume that the unused funds will be invested at MARR.

This portion

of investment

will earn a 10% return on

investment.Slide9

Analysis Period Implied in Comparing Mutually Exclusive AlternativesSlide10

Case 2

Project Lives Longer Than the Analysis Period

What to do

Estimate the

salvage value

at the end of the required service period.

Compute the NPW for each project over the required service period.

PW(15%)

A

= −$362

PW(15%)

B

= −$364Slide11

Case 3A: Service Projects

Project Lives Shorter than the Analysis Period

What to do

Come up with

replacement projects

that match or exceed the required service period.

Compute the NPW for each project over the required service period.

PW(15%)

A

= −$34,359

PW(15%)

B

= −$31,031Slide12

Case 3B: Revenue

Projects

Analysis Period Coincides with the Project with the Longest Life in the Mutually Exclusive Group

What to do

Compute the NPW of each project over its analysis period, assuming no cash flows after the service life for the shorter-lived project.

PW(15%)

Drill

= $2,208,470

PW(15%)

Lease

= $2,180,210Slide13

Case 4

Analysis Period Is Not Specified

What to do

Come up with replacement projects that serve out the

least common multiple period (LCM)

.

Compute the NPW for each project over the LCM.

PW(15%)

A

= −$53,657

PW(15%)

B

= −$48,534Slide14

Summary

Present worth is an equivalence method of analysis in which a project’s cash flows are discounted to a lump sum amount

at the

present time.

The

MARR,

or minimum attractive rate of

return,

is the interest rate at which a firm can always earn or borrow money.

MARR is generally dictated by management and is the rate at which NPW analysis should be conducted

.

Two measures of investment, the net future worth and the capitalized equivalent worth, are variations

of

the NPW criterion.Slide15

The term

mutually exclusive

means

that when

one of several alternatives that meet the same need is selected, the others will be rejected.

Revenue projects

are those for which the income generated depends on the choice of project.

Service projects

are those for which income remains the same, regardless of which project is selected.

The analysis period (study period) is the time span over which the economic effects of an investment will be evaluated.Slide16

The

required service period

is the time span over which the service of equipment (or investment) will be needed.

The analysis period should be chosen to cover the required service period.

When not specified by management or company policy, the analysis period to use in a comparison of mutually exclusive projects may be chosen by the individual analyst

.