/
Personality Types Personality Types

Personality Types - PowerPoint Presentation

calandra-battersby
calandra-battersby . @calandra-battersby
Follow
533 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-28

Personality Types - PPT Presentation

Personality Testing Achievement Motivation Theories of Arousal Arousal and Performance Unit 1 Personality Arousal and Anxiety Contents Personality Types Trait Theory Interactionalist Theory ID: 494314

behaviour arousal performance theory arousal behaviour theory performance personality high zone nach performers cognitive performer somatic level environment suggests

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Personality Types" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Personality TypesPersonality TestingAchievement MotivationTheories of ArousalArousal and Performance

Unit 1- Personality, Arousal and AnxietySlide2

ContentsPersonality Types

Trait

Theory

Interactionalist TheoryHollander’s ModelTrait V InteractionalistEysenck’s ModelNarrow Band TheorySocial LearningPersonality TestingObservations, Questionnaires and SurveyProfile of Mood States (POMS)Encouraging NACH behaviour

Achievement Motivation

Achievement Motivation

Characteristics of NACH and

NAF

Encouraging NACH behaviour

Arousal

Cognitive and Somatic Arousal

Drive Theory

Inverted U Hypothesis

Optimal Arousal

Catastrophe Theory

Peak Flow experience

Zone of Optimal FunctioningSlide3

Trait theoryTrait theory was based on 3 assumptions…

Tendency to behave is stable and unchanging

Tendency to behave is consistent in all different situations

Each person has a unique combination of dispositionsCriticismDoesn’t explain why our behaviour may change in different situationsSocial learning theory- learn by copying others (significant others, friends etc.)Slide4

Interactionalist theory

Interactionalist theorists built on the work by the Trait theorists

They suggested that our behaviour depends upon what traits we have inherited and how these are influenced by our environment.

So we can split personality up into…Traits (Internal) Environment (external)This suggests that our behaviour should be predictable in certain environments HoweverBehaviour may be different as the environment changesSlide5

Hollander’s Model

Social environment

Psychological Core

Inner core of beliefs, values and attitudesFairly permanent, unlikely to changeTypical responsesResponses to a situation show our coreDifferent core will lead to different responsesRole-related behaviourShows our actual responses to a certain situationMost changeable aspect of personalityBehaviour will vary depending onHow we feel?The situation we are in?Slide6

Trait V InteractionalistInteractionalist

Trait

How we behave depends on

both our inner core and the environment which we are put it.We inherit traits that define our personality, greater emphasis is place on the inner core.Key difference- Emphasis placed upon the effect the environment has on your chosen behaviourFederer?Slide7

Eysenck’s ModelPersonality lies on two continua…Extroversion ------- Introversion

Stability ------- Neurosis

Extrovert

Introvert

Like social situations

Outgoing

Likes an audience

Become bored easily.

(RAS) Reticular activated system- not easily stimulated

Dislikes Social situations

Reserved

Dislikes an audience

Easily over aroused

Stable

Neurotic

Reliable

Consistent

Calm

Unpredictable

Restless

Volatile Slide8

Narrow Band TheoryBased on Trait theory as it suggests personality is innate…

Type A

Type B

High stress/arousal levelsLow stress/arousal levelsCompetitiveNot concerned with competitionLacks tolerancePatientNeeds to be in control of taskDoesn’t need to be in control of taskFast workerWorks slowlySlide9

Social LearningInteractionalist approach as it suggests personality is not innate but learned form our experiences…

Behaviour changes according to situation

Therefore cannot be predicted

Significant othersParents, peers, coaches, teachers and role models in mediaSocialisationAccepting and conforming to the ‘norms’ReinforcementIf appropriate behaviour is praised more likely to repeatAlso works with seeing others praisedSlide10

Personality testing3 main formats… Interviews Observations Questionnaires

Tests lack Reliability… (results may not be consistent)

May change their behaviour if the know they are being watched

May be inhibited by wearing a Heart rate monitorPerformers may not give truthful answersInterpreting behaviour during observations is largely subjectiveTests also lack Validity… (Results may not give any useful information)How people act playing sport may not be how they are day-to-dayLittle evidence to support idea of ‘sporting’ personalitySlide11

Profile of Mood States (POMS)Some research has illustrated a difference between more and less successful sportsman

Based on mood states and ability to cope rather than personality traits

Measures the following…

Tension, Depression, Anger, Vigour, Fatigue, Confusion

Iceberg Profile

Successful athletes tend to score…

Higher on anger and vigour

Lower on tension, depression, fatigue and confusion

Can also show when overtraining is happening in elite performers- reduced Vigour

Chicken and egg scenario?

Elite become Iceberg or Iceberg become

E

lite?Slide12

Achievement MotivationCompetitiveness is a key factor for distinguishing sport from

recreation

It has been suggested that in

demanding situations performers exhibit either…A Need to Achieve (NACH)OrA Need to avoid Failure (NAF)This displays the level of competitiveness shown by an individualSlide13

Characteristics of NACH and NAF

NACH Characteristic

NAF

CharacteristicsShows ‘approach’ behaviourShows ‘avoidance’ behaviourSeeks out challengesAvoids challenge- prefers very easy or very hard tasks (guaranteed success or failure)Is concerned with standardsAvoids situations where success is unknown and could be evaluatedEnjoys being evaluatedPerforms worse while being evaluatedNot afraid to failTends to be preoccupied with failureAttributes performance to internal factorsAttributes performance to external factorsHigh task persistenceLacks task persistenceValues feedback form others

Doesn’t

value feedbackSlide14

Encouraging NACH behaviourAvoidance behaviour

arises due to…

Lack of self confidence

High anxietyLearned helplessnessAttributing failure internallyTo generate NACH Approach behaviour…Ensure success by setting achievable process goalsSteadily increase complexity of taskRaise confidence by giving positive re-inforcementHighlight successful role-models with comparable characteristicsAttribute internally for success- Ability or EffortSlide15

Cognitive and Somatic arousalCognitive arousal

Somatic arousal

Increased focus and concentration

Heightened awareness of cues in environmentNarrowing of attentionDecreased reaction time (To a point)However if over arousal occurs it can lead to:-Anxiety and apprehensionTensionNegative self-talkDifficulties sleepingInability to concentrateIncreased heart rateIncreased breathing rateSweatingHeadacheCold, clammy handsDry mouthDazed look in eyesFeeling on nauseaIncreased muscle tensionButterflies in stomachConstant need to urinateDefined as a state of heightened psychological activityAs a performer you will have experienced various levels of arousal and recognise both the physical (Somatic) and mental (Cognitive) signs.Slide16

Drive Theory (Hull, 1943)Proposed a

linear

relationship

between arousal and performanceAs arousal increases so will quality of performanceHigher levels of arousal would intensify the dominant responseFor Elite performers this is likely to be correct responseFor beginners likely to be incorrect responseSpence and Spence (1968) adapted it using an equation:-Performance = Habit strength x drive

Now considered an inadequate explanation

When arousal reaches a high enough point performance will not improve

RonaldoSlide17

Inverted U Hypothesis (Yerkes and Dodson, 1908)

Suggests that performance will increase with arousal to an optimum point.

However if you go beyond that point then performance will decrease

From observations this seems to fit very well, however, it is too simplisticDoes it apply equally to the different phases of learning?Does it apply to all sports performance in the same way? Slide18

Optimal ArousalPhase of Learning

Beginners find it more difficult to cope with arousal

Less habitual (Similar to Drive theory)

Need to give more attention to the skill itself and arousal levels may take concentration awayRely heavily on environmental cues, may miss what is unexpected

Performance

Arousal

Cognitive

Associative

Autonomous

Performance

Arousal

Fine/

Complex

Gross/

Simple

Nature of the Skill

Can vary according to the skill being performed

Gross skills benefit from higher levels of arousal then fine skills

Shot Putt compared to Archery

Varies

within a sport dependant upon role

Rugby forwards compared to backs

Lion's team talkSlide19

Catastrophe theoryBased upon Inverted U theory but differs in what happens during over arousal…

Inverted U suggests gradual decline

Catastrophe theory suggests much faster and more dramatic decline

More of a model than a theory as it attempts to predict human behaviour rather than explain itPerformanceArousal

A

B

C

D

A-

Performer reaches Optimum level of arousal

High cognitive anxiety but low Somatic arousal

B-

Performer has sudden reduction in performance

High cognitive and High Somatic arousal

C-

Possible that performance will continue to deteriorate

D-

Performer gradually regains control as arousal levels decrease

The worst over ever?Slide20

Peak Flow ExperiencePositive Psychological state, achieved by performers when…

The level of challenge matches their skill

They have a clear goal

They have correct attentional styleThey have a positive attitudeThey have control of their arousals levelsTo reach the “Zone” performers should be given a realistic yet challengingChallenge HighChallenge LowSkill Level Low

Skill Level High

Anxiety

Apathy

Boredom

PEAK FLOWSlide21

Zone of Optimal Functioning (ZOF)

In the Zone

Out of Zone

Out of Zone In the ZoneOut of Zone Out of Zone In the Zone Performer A- Low ZOF

Performer B-

Moderate ZOF

Performer C-

High ZOF

Level of Arousal

The Zone (ZOF) is a mental state which performers experience when everything is perfect

Characteristics of the ZOF…

Performing at optimal arousal

Feeling completely calm

Fully concentrating on the task

Feeling completely confident (Success inevitable)

Performing smoothly and efficiently

Performers will often have limited memory of event- Autopilot