/
Sistem Informasi Mutu Pendidikan Formal dan Nonformal Sistem Informasi Mutu Pendidikan Formal dan Nonformal

Sistem Informasi Mutu Pendidikan Formal dan Nonformal - PowerPoint Presentation

calandra-battersby
calandra-battersby . @calandra-battersby
Follow
345 views
Uploaded On 2019-01-22

Sistem Informasi Mutu Pendidikan Formal dan Nonformal - PPT Presentation

Deni Darmawan Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Nusantara Bandung Mei 2015 Kajian Fenomena Mutu Sistem Informasi Mutu Lulusan Progress rate Retention rate Graduate fulltime employment ID: 747709

student education higher mutu education student mutu higher informasi academic learning graduate quality sistem 2007 program teaching faculty association

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Sistem Informasi Mutu Pendidikan Formal ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Sistem Informasi Mutu Pendidikan Formal dan Nonformal

Deni Darmawan

Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Nusantara

Bandung

Mei, 2015Slide2

Kajian Fenomena MutuSlide3

Sistem Informasi Mutu Lulusan

• Progress

rate

• Retention

rate

• Graduate

full-time employment

• Graduate

part

or

full-time

further

study

• Graduate

satisfaction

with

generic skills obtained

• Graduate

satisfaction

with

the

quality of

teaching

received

• Graduate

overall

satisfaction

.Slide4

Indikator Khusus mutu Informasi tentang siswa:

type

and

level

of

course

mode

of

attendance

field

of

study

disciplines

for

units

of

study

attendance

mode

nationality

age

gender

prior

education

country

of

birth

location

of

residence

Aboriginality

other

personal

characteristics

liabilities

through

the

Higher

Education

Contribution

SchemeSlide5

Sistem Informasi Mutu Pengelolaan (Australia)

• Student

achievement

• Curricula

• Faculty

/Class/ Level

• Facilities

• Fiscal

and

administrative

capacity

• Student

support

services

• Recruitment

and

admissions

practices

• Measures

of

the

program

duration

and

objectives

of

degrees

or

credentials

offered

• Records

of

student

complaints. Slide6

Sistem Informasi Mutu Pengelolaan (Newzeland)

• Academic

policies

• Admission

requirements

• Promotion

and

graduation

requirements

• Program

content

• Program

delivery

• Governance

structure

• Human

resources

• Physical

resources

• Credential

recognition

• Regulation

and

accreditation

from

relevant

regulatory

and

professional

bodies

• Policies

and

procedures

for

program

evaluation.Slide7

Sistem Informasi Mutu Pengelolaan (Canada)

Mission

statement

and

academic

goals

Governance

Administrative

capacity

Faculty

and

staff

(number,

qualifications,

employment

conditions,

andprofessional

development)

Information

services

and

learning resources

Infrastructure

Ethical

conduct

Academic

freedom

and

integrity

Financial

stability

Student

protection

Dispute

resolution

Periodic

review.Slide8

References

ACER (2007) Retrieved 18

December,

2007 fromhttp://www.acer.edu.au/documents/AUSSE_

Brochure.pdf

American Association for Higher Education (AAHE). (1998). American College Personnel Association. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. Powerful partnerships. A shared responsibility for learning. A joint report. Retrieved February 23,

2007

from:

http://www.aahe.org/teaching/tsk_frce.htm

.

Anderson

,

G.

(2006).

Assuring

quality/resisting

quality

assurance:

academics

responses

to

‘quality’

in

some Australian universities. Quality in Higher Education, 12 (2), 161-173.

Denise

Chalmers, Katie Lee and Becky Walker

(

2008

).

International and national

quality

teaching and learning

performance

models

currently

in

use

.

Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Ltd.

Young

, S. & Shaw, D. G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 670-686.

Westerlund

, J. (2007). Class size and student evaluations in Sweden. Education Economics. 16(1) 19 - 28

Umbach

, P. D. &

Wawrzynski

, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153-184.

Umbach

, P. D. &

Kuh

, G. D. (2006). Student experiences with diversity at liberal arts colleges: another claim for distinctiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 169-192.

Unite

NZUAAU. (2007). Academic audit manual for use in Cycle 4 academic audits. New Zealand Universities Academic Audit Unit, Retrieved

08th

February

, 2008

from:http

://

www.nzuaau.ac.nz/nzuaau_site/publications/reports/AuditManualDecember2007.pdf