PPT-Summary of Fare Change Feedback and Proposal

Hillary Foose Director Communication amp Marketing Background Fall 2011 Conducted public outreach for 25 increase to base fares Early 2012 Initiated Title VI analysis tabled fare increase discussion . Sponsored Projects Services. Uaccess. Learning: UA-1044-1. 2. Agenda. Is it a sponsored project?. Proposal Types. Revision or Continuation?. Administrative Changes. Changes in budget. Pre-proposals and White Papers. EcoPass. Recommendation. Operations & Customer Service Committee. September 8, 2015. Fare Study Process. Summer 2014: Fare Study Initiated. First phase was focused on fare structure. Pricing was incorporated as part of the recommendations for public hearings. April 30, 2014. Southwest Effect Examples. 2. Houston, TX. Charleston. , SC. Memphis, TN. Wichita, KS. Flint, MI. Philadelphia to Pittsburg . 3. Market. Before Period. Service Begins. Interim Period. publicly . available datasets.. The Institute For Transport Studies – The University of Leeds. Dr Andrew Mark Tomlinson. 23. rd. April 2015. Class 87 at Crewe, April 1977. 3 x Class 86’s at Preston, April 1977. & Technology. Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality . Motivation: Why do we care about fares? . The fare system impacts many aspects of the transit system, including…. Planning: . fare technology provides data about ridership. Hillary Foose. Director, Communication & Marketing. Background. Fall 2011 – Conducted public outreach for $.25 increase to base fares. Early 2012 – Initiated Title . VI . analysis; tabled fare increase discussion . Prathyusha Maryada. Saradruthi. Swaroop . Vikas. Group 7. Final Presentation . Step 1. : In SQL Server Management Studio, connect to SBUS-DB server. Right click and create a new database. For this project, we have created a database by the name . 2. 6. Concepts. Proposal. Public Outreach. Final. Adoption. Implementation. Review. 4. Outreach Review. Website . Special Rider News. Media Release. 4 Open Houses. 8 Passenger Intercepts. Webinar. 12. Simplify. RTD’s fare policy in an . equitable . and . cost-effective. . manner to better serve the needs of the District and its customers moving forward. Goals:. Simplicity (ease of use). Acceptability/Marketability (implementable). ZED Super Low - WG- Dallas, Texas October 2017 ZED and MIBA fares: our journey to-date ZED was retained as the industry standard, with the ZMR2 levels used as a baseline against which ZL and ZH were calculated The Fare Study Objective: Simplify RTD’s fare policy in an equitable and cost-effective manner to better serve the needs of the District and its customers moving forward Goals: Simplicity (ease of use) Updated Nov. 2009 I hereby certify in accordance with federal regulation 49CFR.609.3, ____________________ because his/her disability requires special ass I declare under the penalty of perjury that a FYAP – May 6, 2014. Julie Wammack, Assistant Director. Sponsored Research Administration (SRA). Steps for Proposal Submission. Find funding that matches your research interests/needs. Review all . the agency documents – funding solicitation, agency guidelines, etc.. [Course Instructor]. [Course Semester]. [Course Number]. Materials developed. by C. Brakewood, K. Watkins, and J. . LaMondia. .. Outline . Motivation: Why should we care about fares?. Key “parameters” of a transit fare system:.