PPT-A predictive Collision Avoidance Model for Pedestrian Simul

Author Ioannis Karamouzas et al Presented by Jessica Siewert Content of presentation Previous work The method Implementation Experiments Assessment Developments since Introduction Previous work. Detection: . introduction. Approaches. Holistic detection: use local search window that meets . criterias. Part-based detection: pedestrian as a collection of parts (to be found!). Patch-based detection: local features matched against a (learned) codebook, then voting for final detection. This Presentation. Similarities and Differences with Other Areas. No Magic Bullet. Site, Corridor Specific. Multiple, Complementary Strategies. San Diego. Similarities & Differences. Climate & Geography. Public Works Department and Community, Environmental, and Development Services Department. August 25, 2015. . Mayor Jacobs has directed County staff to maintain and enhance the County’s . . coordinated, comprehensive, and consistent . Predictive Modeling. . . encompasses a variety of techniques to analyze current and historical facts to make predictions about future events.. Predictive models . exploit patterns . found in historical and transactional data . buildings.  by the location of stores and the structure of the walking space. Masaya FUJITANI, Tatsuya KISHIMOTO. Ref 8094. Keywords . visibility graph analysis, commercial building, store floor areas, multiple regression analysis, models.. Logistics. Health and safety . (restrooms, . exits, . etc.). Please silence cell phones. . Please ask questions. Breaks . / . Lunch. Sign-in sheet. 2. Self Introductions. . Your Name, Organization & Position. CHAMPAIGN CITY COUNCIL • STUDY SESSION • JULY 9, 2013. Why develop a Pedestrian Plan?. Council goals support creating a pedestrian plan. Council Goal 1: . “Our City Fosters Quality of Life. for All Citizens”. Vision/Goals/Objectives. R2CTPO Board Meeting. January 25, 2017. Background. The Volusia County MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan was adopted on January 25, 2005. UPWP Task 3.02 includes an updated Bicycle . Steps. Step 1 – Establish Goals and Objectives. Step 2 – Analyze Safety Data. Step 3 – Gather Stakeholder Input. Step 4 – Identify Safety Improvements. Step 5 – Implement and Evaluate Programs. Town of Maggie Valley . Board of Aldermen . October 10, 2016. A Call To Action . 2015-2016 Town Center Master Plan. Public Driven Process. Board of Aldermen interact with the plan in real time; same as public. Why good practice ?. accountability. reputation. efficiency . repeatable. systematic. representative. Indicators of good practice. documented. Bird survey design at any proposed development should focus on:. Seattle Planning Commission. Michelle Marx, Ian Macek, Kevin O’Neill. May 26, 2016. Our mission, vision, and core values. Committed to . 5 core values . to create a city that is:. Safe. Interconnected. Safety at Railroad Grade . Crossings. Paul . Metaxatos and P.S. Sriraj. Urban Transportation Center. University of Illinois at Chicago . Email. : pavlos@uic.edu. 62nd . Annual . Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference. Maura . Marcucci. on behalf of POISE-3 Investigators. McMaster University, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Canada), National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Research Grant Council (Hong Kong SAR).