PPT-Development of Vendor Performance Ratings/ Scorecards-

In support of contract management Zachary Christensen Contract Analyst Division of Purchasing Contracting with and monitoring vendors performance Vendor Performance His promises were as he then was Mighty but his performance . BY DIFFERENTIALS A handicap differential is the differ ence between the adjusted gross score and the USGA Course Rating multiplying the difference by 113 dividing the result ing figure by the USGA Slope Rating and rounding off to the nearest tenth T Connects and Disconnects. Soniya. . Carvalho. Lead Evaluation Officer and ICR Review Coordinator, IEGPS. Independent Evaluation Group. How are Projects Rated at the World Bank?. Project ratings are based on evaluation criteria that are harmonized across IEG and OPCS. 2013. Objective of the Discussion. Discuss the various rating methodologies and gain a mutual understanding of their pros and cons. Determine if we want to have one ratings methodology or multiple ratings methodologies (depending on the class of boat). Corporate Mentoring Program (CMP) . System Overview. (Short Format). . CMP Education and Training Series. 2. CMP Integrated Education and Training System. An Integrated Learn by Doing Approach to Supply Chain Strategy Development and Implementation. Introduction. Importance of presentation capability of BI. Technologies that support decision making. Tactical decisions. Strategic decisions. Online analytical processing (OLAP) . Visual analytics. Performance dashboards. Corporate Mentoring Program (CMP) . System Overview. (Short Format). . CMP Education and Training Series. 2. CMP Integrated Education and Training System. An Integrated Learn by Doing Approach to Supply Chain Strategy Development and Implementation. Key Characteristics. Judgment based. Completed by teachers, school professionals in 3 parts (Participation, Task Supports, Activity Performance). Measures a student’s performance in functional (non-academic) tasks. EMPLOYEE PRESENTATION. AGENDA. Rationale for merit-based salary program . Scope of 2016 appraisal changes. Impact . to . you. Timeline and details. Resources. 2. Rationale for P4P. University commitment to pay for performance. guide for Vendors who need to review and respond to . Performance Evaluations (PEs) . in PASSPort. . For more detailed step-by-step instructions on the PE process, please refer to the Performance Evaluation for Vendors User . - Overview. . Updated July 2012. Agenda. Components of the Rating Process. Rating Performance Objectives. Rating Performance Elements. Addressing “Unacceptable” Performance. Determining the Recommended Overall Evaluation of Record. Proposed, Public Hearing Jan 13. PLDs and PLDs. Domain V. Domain V Big Ideas. You choose 3 indicators and report to TEA before school starts. Who chooses and how is that determined?. We still continue to report all indicators on old system.. Roxanne Cade. June 13, 2017. Nutrition Services Directors. Identify the compliance status of authorized WIC vendors for the 1. st. and 2. nd. quarter of FFY17. Identify the status of the application process for Application Period 1 and Period . Objective of the Discussion. Discuss the various rating methodologies and gain a mutual understanding of their pros and cons. Determine if we want to have one ratings methodology or multiple ratings methodologies (depending on the class of boat). Housekeeping items. Session is being recorded.. Use the chat box to ask questions at any time.. Please silence phones and minimize background noise.. Inform your co-workers that you’re attending this session..