PPT-Research Ethics Office Kim Kordov

Research Ethics Office 1 RAD 201b Why Do We Have REBACUC 2 Previous abuses in human experimentation have led to guidelines for the ethical treatment of human participants German experimentation on Jewish prisoners in WWII. Helena Siipi. University of Turku. helsii@utu.fi. Contents. Ethics for authors. Ethics for referees. 3. . Ethics for publishers. . 1. Ethics for authors. Who is the author?. Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity 2012: . What it is and getting approval at LSHTM. John Porter. 2. Outline. Research ethics principles. Ethics review. Consent. Confidentiality. Ethics in the field. Making an ethics application to LSHTM. [Key reference: Rhodes & . how health research is reviewed. This presentation has been developed to form part of the lesson ‘Research ethics and how health research gets reviewed’ - www.nuffieldbioethics.org/education. ‘Clinical research’ - What is it?. Jan Deckers. School of Medical Sciences. Education Development. Email:. . jan.deckers@ncl.ac.uk. Objectives. To reflect. on what (research) ethics is.. To develop. your skills as an ethical researcher.. Audit. Service Evaluation. Surveillance. Usual practice. Research. Healthy volunteers. Recruits from outwith NHS environment. C. ontact . University Research Governance . Office. to discuss Sponsorship. A Guide. 1. Before Writing an Ethics Application. Why is writing an ethics application NOT a waste of time?. . It helps you to... . clarify your research questions. . limit your research questions.. Finding a Good Candidate. “In . solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able to reason backward. .”. Step 1: . What Office needs to be filled?. What Skills does the Candidate need?. Roger Watson. Professor of Nursing. University of Hull. 12 April 2015. What are ethics?. Ethics are what you do when nobody is looking. Without ethics. Your guess is as good as mine. Expediency rules. Presented by:. Joanne Muratori & . Patria Davis. Agenda. Objective. Review . history, role, and function of the Institutional Review Board. Review federal definition of human subjects research and levels of review. Susan L. Rose, Ph.D.. Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS). Panoramic View of OPRS. Flexibility . Coalition. Webpage. Inclusion/ exclusion Criteria. California Coalition. Quality Improvement activities. Office of Research Assurances. 205 . Albrook. , Pullman. http://www.ora.wsu.edu. Updated January . 2015. Recording date of this workshop is . January 16, 2015. Some of the rules and procedures discussed in this workshop are subject to change.. Issues in Research Ethics. Coercion. $$$, extra credit, social pressures. Privacy. Deception. Physiology of cheating. Discomfort or Harm. Right to . Service. Experimental group gets beneficial treatment, control group does not.. . in. . PPIE . and. . Participatory. . Research. Presented. . by. Dr. . Steph. . Grohmann. Senior. . Program. . Manager. . Research. . Ethics. . and. . Inclusion. Outline:. What is research ethics and why do we need it?. In social science, we can think of it as “principles of conduct”. Why should we care about ethics?. Working with humans. Developing trust – so people take part in research in the future. Maintaining your/your organisations/social science’s reputation.