USR Adjutant General School BOLCB July 2016 LESSON OUTCOME This lesson provides information on personnel and medical readiness transformation HQDA reporting policies and procedures and preparing USR personnel readiness data At the conclusion of this lesson students are enabled to comm ID: 671408
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for the..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for the Commander Unit Status Report (USR)
Adjutant General School
BOLC-B
July 2016Slide2
LESSON OUTCOME
This lesson provides information on personnel and medical readiness transformation, HQDA reporting policies and procedures, and preparing USR personnel readiness data. At the conclusion of this lesson, students are enabled to communicate the redesigned personnel and medical readiness deployablity standards, review / prepare personnel readiness data for USR, and calculate personnel-level (P-Level) metrics.
.
21ST CENTURY COMPETENCIES
Accountability and Initiative
Lifelong Learner Teamwork and Collaboration
Communication and Engagement
Tactical and Technical Competence
TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE
ACTION:
Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Reporting (USR)
CONDITIONS: In a classroom environment, given access to AR 220-1, DA PAM 220-1, Army Directive 2016-07 (Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability), eMILPO Training Database, USR personnel and medical readiness data, and awareness of Operational Environment (OE) variables and actors.STANDARD: With a minimum of 70% accuracy, students must: 1. Assess the personnel and medical readiness deployability standards of unit personnel.2. Review USR personnel readiness data and HQDA reporting policies.3. Calculate the unit’s overall Personnel Level (P-Level).
Terminal Learning Objective
2Slide3
Personnel and Medical Readiness TransformationUSR Personnel Reporting Data and HQDA Reporting Policies
Calculating Personnel-Level (P-Level) Metrics
Defense Readiness Reporting System -Army (DRRS-A)
Agenda3Slide4
4Personnel and Medical Readiness Deployability StandardsSlide5
Bottom Line Up Front
Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability Transformation supports the Chief of Staff’s #1 priority.
This effort is both revolutionary and evolutionary in all aspects. The overhaul is essential and highly impactful.
The S-1 plays a key role assisting and supporting commanders and h
ealthcare professionals.
There is no greater priority than Readiness
!
“Readiness is my #1 priority.”
GEN Mark A. Milley, CSA
The culture of
Readiness
in the Army is changing.
Commanders and health care providers are collaborating to improve the
health, welfare
, and
deployability
of Soldiers.
5Slide6
Medical Readiness Policy Changes
The
SECARMY Directive
written by OTSG, HQDA G-1, and HQDA G-3 provides the policy bridge to support implementation of
Personnel Readiness
transformation to coincide with reductions in Army End Strength.
Changes to the Medical Readiness Classification (MRC) codes, physical category codes, deployment limiting (DL) codes, and profiling system will be more fully described in the Medical Readiness AR and DA PAM upon publication.
The
Medical Readiness
policy is split into an
AR
and
DA PAM
to align with the Army Readiness reporting guidance.
The new AR keeps the policy statements simple and clear.
The DA PAM describes how and in some cases why. There will be users and leaders guides to describe the more fluid aspects of the new processes and system.
AR 40-501 will become the medical standards only.
6Slide7
Tactical Points of Influence
(
M
edi
ca
l
)
R
ead
i
n
ess is…
•
Res
p
on
s
ib
i
lity
at
the
Squad
le
v
el
•
Ens
u
r
e
d
at
the
Platoon / Company level • Reviewed at the Battalion / Brigade level • Facilitated at the Installation level
7Slide8
MEDPROS Commander Portal
(1 of 2)
Integrates all essential medical readiness information in one easy-to-use application.
Company commander or designee will review the following medical readiness information to determine deployability:
Profile
Integrated Disability
Evaluation System
(IDES) status
Deployment Health
Assessment Program
Status
Periodic Health
Assessment
Dental Readiness
Medical Readiness
Assessment Tool data.
New MEDPROS Commander Portal
Link to the demo site:
https://rcstage.mods.army.mil/MHA/prototype/dash_-_today.html
8Slide9
MEDPROS Commander Portal
(2 of 2)
Commanders Portal Home Page provides the following features:
UNIT READINESS: A consolidated view of unit medical readiness, displays the overall Unit Readiness data and enables commanders to project out to future dates IOT proactively manage Unit Readiness.
MANAGE DEPLOYABILITY:
Allows commanders to see the number of Soldiers requiring medical deployability determinations.
MANAGE PROFILES:
A snapshot of Soldiers on profile and how many profiles still need to be reviewed.
RESOURCES:
Provides links to unit Medical Readiness Assessment Tool (MRAT) and Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) Dashboard.
ACTION ITEMS:
Enables commanders to view all Soldiers with items that need to be actioned in one list regardless of the action needed. (e.g. profile review, deployability determination, overdue IMR items and deployment health assessments needed). This was previously in three different applications (eProfile, NetUSR, and MEDPROS Web Reporting). MESSAGES: Enables the commander to track and manage communication with Providers regarding Soldiers on profile.
9Slide10
“Available” to “Deployed”
Deployable
– A Soldier who is:
Under the direct operational control of the reporting unit, whether present or can be present within 72 hours,
Is in compliance with all required personnel readiness standards
Is not restricted from deploying to perform the unit’s core designed and assigned missions.
Non-Deployable
– A Soldier who is restricted from worldwide deployment for a unit’s core designed or assigned mission due to one of the following reasons:
Does not meet the Army’s baseline individual readiness standards for worldwide deployment as defined by Administrative and Medical policies;
Does not meet the Combatant Commander’s specific individual readiness standards when tailored for accomplishment of an assigned mission;
Cannot be under the direct operational control of the reporting unit (cannot be present within 72 hours); or
Has not graduated from an Area of Concentration (AOC) or Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) awarding course.
Commander’s Call – any reason not mentioned above.
Deployable
Non-Deployable
Applicable to all Operating and Generating Force Soldiers
regardless
of component
10Slide11
Code
Description
Reference: SECARMY
Directive 2016-07, Table 1
1
Temp Profile > 14 days
2
Dental Readiness Class 3
3
Pregnancy
4
Permanent profile indicating a MAR2 action needed
5
Permanent profile indicating a MEB action needed
6
Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is needed
7
Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X)
Deployment-Limiting Codes
11Slide12
Code
Description
Reference: SECARMY
Directive 2016-07, Table 2
F
No assignment or deployment to OCONUS areas where definitive medical care for the Soldier’s medical condition is not available.
S
MEB. Soldier has been determined to meet medical retention standards by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).
T
Waiver granted for a disqualifying medical condition/standard for initial enlistment or appointment. The disqualifying medical condition/standard for which a waiver was granted will be documented in the Soldier’s accession medical examination.
V
Deployment. This code identifies a Soldier with restrictions on deployment to certain areas.
W
MAR2. This Soldier has a permanent 3 or 4 profile with a MAR2 (MOS Administrative Retention Review) finding of retain or reclassify and returned to duty.
X
COAD/COAR. This Soldier is allowed to continue in the military service with a disease, injury, or medical defect that is below medical retention standards, pursuant to a waiver of retention standards, or waiver of unfit finding and continued on active duty or in active Reserve status under AR 635–40.
Y
Fit for duty. This Soldier has been determined to be fit for duty (not entitled to separation or retirement because of physical disability) after complete processing under AR 635–40.
Physical Category Codes
12Slide13
Medical Readiness Classes (MRC)
MRC
Short Definition
Medical Definition
CDR Deployability
Determination
MRC 1
Medically
Ready / Deployable
Meets all Medical Readiness Requirements and Dental Readiness Class 1 or 2
– Temp Profile ≤ 7 days
Not
required
MRC 2
Partially Medically Ready / Deployable
Soldier is
deficient
in one of the following:
– Temp Profile between 8 and 14 days inclusive
– Hearing Readiness Class 4 (current within 13 months)
– Vision Readiness Class 4 (current within 15 months)
– DNA (Drawn/ on file with DoD Repository)
– HIV (Drawn / validated with DoD Repository)
– Immunizations current or valid exception (Routine Adult Immunization Profile)
– HepA, HepB, TDA, MMR, Polio, Varicella, (Influenza-seasonal)
– Individual Medical Equipment (1MI, 2 pair eye glasses, MCEP-I, MWT, and Hearing Aid w/batteries, if required
Not required.
MRC 3
Not Medically Ready /
Non-Deployable
Commander determines
Deployability for:
– Temp Profile >14 Days (DL1)
– Dental Readiness
Class 3 (DL2)
Deployment Limiting Condition
(DL).
Soldier is
deficient
in one of the following:
DL 1
– Temp Profile > 14 days
DL 2
– Dental Readiness Class 3DL 3– Pregnancy or post-partumDL 4– Permanent profile indicating an MOS Administrative Retention Review (MAR2) action is neededDL 5– Permanent profile indicating a MEB action is neededDL 6– Permanent profile indicating a Non-Duty Related action is neededDL 7– Permanent profiles with a deployment / assignment restriction code (F, V, or X)DL 1 / 2: Soldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable; commanderdetermines Deployability.DL 3 / 4 / 5 / 6: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by commander and by policy.DL 7: Soldier cannot be deemed deployable by the commander. Upon receipt of an assigned mission, may request COCOM waivers.MRC 4Not Medically Ready /Non-Deployable andCDR determinesDeployability (defaultNon-Deployable)Status is unknown.Soldier is deficient in one of the following:– Periodic Health Assessment (current within 15 months)– Dental Readiness Class 4 (current within 15 MonthsSoldier is Not Medically Ready / Non-DeployableCommander determines Deployability.13Slide14
Administrative Non-Deployable
1. Does not meet baseline Individual Readiness Standards.
•
Lautenberg Amendment
• Legal Processing
• Military, civil, or criminal investigation activity
• Pending legal discharge or separation
• Sole Survivor / Surviving Family member
• Conscientious Objector
• Under the age of 18
• Inadequate Family Care Plan
• Parenthood or Adoption
• Postpartum Operational Deferment.
Reference: SECARMY Directive 2016-07
2. Does not meet combatant commander’s (COCOM’s) mission-specific individual readiness standards when tailored for accomplishment of an assigned mission.
3. Cannot be under direct operational control of reporting unit (present or able to be present within 72 hours)
Transition leave or AWOL
No Operational Control (e.g., have deployed separately, rear detachment, TCS, etc.).
4. Soldiers who have not graduated from an AOC / MOS awarding course.
5. Commander’s Call.
14Slide15
• A single living document with temporary and permanent profiles on a single form.
• Incorporates all current functional and assignment limitations.
• Tracks total number of days a Soldier has been on profile and by condition.
• Increases visibility (MEB / IDES).
• Permanent profiles must be transcribed into the new system within 15 months (with current supporting evidence if needed)
• If in MEB / PEB process, only MEB physician can transcribe
New DA Form 3349 Physical Profile
(Page 1)
Section 5
Medical Instructions to Unit Commanders
Details what a Soldier cannot physically do
Commanders cannot disregard based on new policy guidance
15Slide16
New DA Form 3349 Physical Profile
(Page 2)
Section 6 – APFT
Details permanent and/or temporary limitations
No automatic recovery period – Soldier can take a record APFT when physically able, even with alternate event
Section 8 – Unit Commander
Unit CDR or his/her designee must review all profiles in the CDR portal, which is recorded here.
Section 7
Physical Readiness Training Capabilities
Describes the PRT instructions to optimize Soldier recovery and participation in unit training.
Providers will be trained to focus on capabilities.
16Slide17
Check on Learning
Q. When is a Soldier considered to be “deployable”?
A.
A Soldier is considered deployable when:The Soldier is under the direct operational control of the reporting unit, whether present or can be present within 72 hours;
The Soldier is in compliance with all required personnel readiness standards; and
The Soldier is not restricted from deploying to perform the unit’s core designed and assigned missions.
Q. Under which Deployment Limiting Conditions must the commander make a decision on whether the Soldier is deployable?
A. DL 1 - Temporary Profile > 14 days
DL 2 - Dental Readiness Class 3
17Slide18
18USR Personnel Reporting Data and HQDA Reporting Policies
AR 220-1
DA PAM 220-1
Army Directive 2016-07Slide19
Adjustments to Readiness Reporting
Policy in AR 220-1
REFERENCE:
SECARMY Directive 2016-07, Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability (1 March 2016).
Readiness Reporting
Commanders will no longer report the
“available”
status of personnel in the USR.
Commanders will report the
“deployable”
status of all personnel in USR as it relates to unit personnel readiness status (P-Level).
Commander’s override to a Soldier’s administrative and medical deployability will be performed in the authoritative data sources that provide medical and administrative readiness status (e.g., MEDPROS, eMILPO, RLAS, SIDPERS).
Overall Unit Readiness
Directive does not change the assessment of unit overall readiness to perform its core mission IAW its designed capabilities or assigned mission.
A unit’s C-Level assessment will continue to be derived from the four measured areas of Personnel (P), Equipment
and Supplies On
Hand (
S), Equipment Readiness
(
R), and Training level (T)
.
Personnel Measured Areas (P-Level)
Unit will measure personnel readiness using three metrics:
Total Deployable Strength
Assigned Military Occupational Specialty skills match
Deployable Senior Grade Composite level.
The terms “
available / non-available
” replaced by “
deployable / non-deployable
.”
19Slide20
Commander’s Unit Status Report
Status Updates Briefed Monthly to Army Senior Leadership
OVERVIEW
The USR is intended to be
a “commander’s report,”
reflecting the commander’s personal judgments and assessments regarding the mission readiness of the unit.
Reports are prepared by commanders or their designated representatives and routinely submitted through
assigned channels
to HQDA.
The USR is
not
a performance report card and should not be used as a tool to evaluate or compare the accomplishments of organizations or those of their commanders.
All commanders at all times will submit
timely, accurate and complete
reports that neither exaggerate nor mask their units’ readiness deficiencies.
No commander is expected to report readiness levels that are
inconsistent
with resources made available to the unit.
20Slide21
MTOE UnitsUnits with Unit Identification Code (UIC) ending in AA
TDA UnitsUnits with UIC-AA
Units that are deployable or apportioned to Joint operations/ contingency plansSpecial USR Provisions
Units with UIC ending in FFSeparate BrigadesMulti-component units (COMPO)No unit automatically exempt from USR requirements
Reporting Units
21Slide22
Report Formats and Categories22
CUSRs are comprised of:
Basic Unit Information (BUI)Readiness and capability measurements
Assessments and data pointsCommander’s commentsTwo formatsFullAbbreviatedFour categories
Regular
ValidationDeployed
ChangeSlide23
Notes: See Table 4-1 of AR 220-1 for full notes
Report Submission
23Slide24
USR Security Classification
24
AR 220-1, Chapter 11 Classification is based on
number / type
of reporting units and the
amount / type of sensitive information.
Minimum classification for MTOE units:
SECRET
:
Major Combat Units (FF-level UIC) at the brigade-level and above SECRET: More than one battalion or five or more separate MTOE company / detachment sized units (AA-level UIC)
CONFIDENTIAL
:
All reports not classified SECRET IAW established guidelines
Retain for minimum of 2 years at the major unit/headquarters level; not less than 6 months by other reporting units (AA-level UIC)
All USRs and associated data will be marked with a specific declassification date Slide25
Equipment and Supplies On
Hand / Available (
S-level)
Calculated by comparing the pacing items of mission essential equipment and the total mission essential equipment items currently in the unit’s possession, under its control, or available to it within 72 hours. “On-hand”-
reflects the items that are issued or are accountable to the unit within 72 hours for mission execution.
“Pacing” items - those major weapon systems, aircraft and other equipment items that are central to the units’ ability to perform its core functions / designed capabilities.
25
Measured Areas of the USR
(P, S, R, T)
Equipment Readiness /
Serviceability (
R
-level)
Indicates how well unit is
maintaining
its on-hand equipment.
Considered operational if
“Fully Mission Capable”
IAW applicable technical manual (TM) standards.
Determined by calculating an aggregate R-level that considers all
maintenance reportable equipment
in the unit’s possession and then determining a separate R-level for each
maintenance reportable pacing item.
Training Level
(
T-
level)
Reflects the
commander’s assessment of unit proficiency
in the Mission Essential Tasks (METs) associated with its core functions / designed capabilities.
Personnel Level
(
P
-level)
Lowest level determined for:
Total Deployable Strength
Assigned MOS Skills Match
Deployable Senior Grade Composite LevelSlide26
Overall Unit Readiness and Mission Capability Assessments
Commanders
always
report this assessment monthly.
Fulfills Existing Joint Staff Requirements
(supports Congressional Oversight, Chairman’s Risk Assessment, and other COCOM oriented assessments)
Core Functions/Designed Capabilities = MTOE/TDA
Personnel
Equipment on Hand
Equipment Serviceability
Training
(METL)
C-Level
How well a unit is resourced and trained, measured against the
core functions and fundamental capabilities
for which it was
“
as designed
”
One report contains both the
“as designed“
and
“assigned mission”
assessments.
Commanders
Unit Status Report (CUSR)
Commanders report this assessment
when a mission is assigned.
Assigned Mission Manning
Assigned Mission Equipping
A-Level Reporting Trigger. Commanders report A-Level when one condition is met:
Directed by chain of command.
When the focus of training is the deployed mission environment (i.e., NLT LAD minus 270 days)
A-Level
How well a unit is resourced and trained measured against the “
assigned mission
” requirements of the unit.
Feeds Joint Staff Percentage Effective (PCTEF) data requirement)
AR 220-1, Chapter 9
26Slide27
27
C-1:
Unit
can undertake
the missions it was designed for
C-2:
Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to
undertake most
of the its missions for which it is designed
C-3:
Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to
undertake many, but not all
, portions of the mission for which it is designed
C-4:
Unit
requires additional resources or training
to undertake its designed mission, but may be directed to undertake some portions of its mission with resources on hand
C-5:
Unit is undergoing a service directed resource action and
is not prepared, at this time
, to undertake the full spectrum mission for which designed.
AR 220-1, para 4-4a DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5
An overall unit readiness metric established by the Joint Staff.
C-levels reflect the unit‘s ability to
accomplish core functions, provide designed capabilities, and execute the standardized METs.
Derived from four measured areas (PSRT) that indicate the availability status of resources and unit training proficiency measured against the designed capabilities from the unit’s MTOE or TDA.
Category Levels (C-Level)Slide28
Army Methodology for Overall
Readiness Assessments
Figure 4-2, AR 220-1
28Category-Level (C-level)Slide29
29
Assigned Mission Levels
(A-Level)
Overall assessment that reflects the unit’s ability to accomplish the assigned mission and those tasks on its METL.
Contains measured resource areas that indicate the availability status of resources (personnel and equipment) measured against resource requirements for the assigned mission.
The following definitions apply:
A-1:
Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to
undertake the full assigned mission.
A-2:
Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake most of the assigned mission. A-3: Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to undertake many, but not all
, portions of the assigned mission.
A-4:
Unit
requires additional resources or training
to undertake the assigned mission, but may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand.
AR 220-1, Appendix C DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5(b) Slide30
Figure 4-2, AR 220-1
30
Army Methodology for Overall
Readiness Assessments Assigned Mission-Level (A-Level)Slide31
The Four Tier Rating Scale
The following metrics comprise the “four tier” rating scale for unit readiness status measurements and assessments. Note that level 5 and level 6 are exceptional values reported in place of level 4 or only when special circumstances apply, respectively.
1
Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission it is currently assigned.
2
Unit possesses required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide
most of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake most of the mission it is currently assigned.
3
Unit possesses the required resources and is trained to accomplish or provide
many, but not all
, of the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake many, but not all, portions of the mission it is currently assigned.
4Unit requires additional resources or training to accomplish or provide the core functions and fundamental capabilities for which it was designed or to undertake the mission currently assigned; however, the unit may be directed to undertake portions of the assigned mission with resources on hand (available).
5
Unit is undergoing a HQDA-directed resource action and/or is part of a HQDA directed program and is
not prepared
to accomplish
or provide the core functions or fundamental capabilities for which it was designed. Units report C-5 IAW the policy and procedures established in AR 220-1, para 4-8. Level 5 is not applicable to A-level reporting.
6
Level 6 is applicable to the measured areas only. It indicates that a measured area is
not measurable
, or by HQDA direction, is not measured.
AR 220-1, para 4-6 DA PAM 220-1, para 3-5
31Slide32
Mission Capability Assessment32
The “three tier” rating scale (
Y
/ Q / N) will be used by all measured units to determine and report their
Mission Essential Task (MET)
capability assessments.
Y
“Yes”
- The organization can accomplish the task to standard under the specified conditions. A “Yes” assessment should reflect demonstrated performance in training or operations whenever possible.
Q
“Qualified Yes”
- The organization is expected to accomplish the task to standard, but this performance has not been observed or demonstrated in training or operations. Organizations assessing their task capability as a “Qualified Yes” may be employed for those tasks.
N
“No”
- The organization is unable to accomplish the MET to standard at this time.
AR 220-1, para 4-7 DA PAM 220-1, para 9-2 ADRP 7-0, para 3-71
T/P/U (ADRP 7-0) measures unit’s
training proficiency
for its METL
tasks.
Y/Q/N capability assessment is intended to
reflect a unit’s actual
potential to perform the task.Slide33
Overall Unit Readiness and Mission Capability Assessments
Figure 4-1, AR 220-1
33Slide34
34
Q: What are the three metrics used to determine P-Level?
Total Deployable StrengthAssigned MOS Skills Match
Senior Grade Composite LevelQ: Unit Status Reports are comprised of what four elements?Basic Unit Information (BUI)
Readiness and capabilities measurements
Assessments and data pointsCommander’s comments
Check on LearningSlide35
35Calculate Personnel-Level (P-Level) MetricsSlide36
Personnel Metrics and Data
AR 220-1, Chapter 9
36
Critical personnel metrics include:
Required Strength
Assigned Strength Percentage
Total Deployable Strength
Assigned MOS
S
kills Match
Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level
Metrics for Determining
P-Level
Deployable Senior Grade
Level
Deployable Strength
Assigned
MOS Skills Match
By
Category
Composite
1
100% - 90%
100% - 85%
100 - 85%
1.54 or less
2
89% - 80%
84% - 75%
84 - 75%
1.55 - 2.44
3
79% - 70%
74% - 65%
74 - 65%
2.45 - 3.34
4
69% or less
64% or less
64%
or less
3.35 or moreMetrics: Readiness status measurements
or assessments accomplished IAW the criteria
established by AR 220-1.
Data Points: Measurements, assessments, orfacts that do not directly support the resource measurement; however, provide specific infofor management oversight or trend analysis.Used to Determine P-LevelSlide37
Required Strength
=
Unit’s formal requirements (MTOE or TDA). Requiredstrength is the baseline (denominator) for each of the three P-Level metrics.
Required Strength
37Slide38
Assigned Strength
Assigned Strength
=
Soldiers formally assigned to the units by official orders
Assigned strength % = Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength x 100
38Slide39
Deployable Strength
39
P-level 1 2 3 4
Deployable
100-90% 89-80% 79-70% 69% or less
Deployable Strength % = Deployable Strength ÷ Required Strength x 100
Deployable Strength
=
The portion of the unit’s assigned strength and attachments, to include individual Soldier augmentations, that are considered
deployable
with the unit to accomplish the core functions and / or designed capabilities for which the unit was designed.
Personnel Deployability
Criteria
SECARMY Directive 2017-07.
SECARMY Directive 2016-07, Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability (1 March 2016), specified that commander’s will no longer report the
“Available”
status of personnel in USR.Slide40
Administrative Non-Deployable
Categories and MRCs
Medical Readiness Classifications
MR1
- Medically Ready / Deployable
MR2
– Partially Medically Ready / Deployable
MR3
– Not Medically Ready / Non-Deployable
Commander determines deployability for:
DL1 – Temp Profile > 14 days
DL2 – Dental Readiness Class 3
MR4
– Non Medically Ready / Nondeployable
and Commander determines deployability
(default is nondeployable)
Individual Readiness Standards
•
Lautenberg Amendment
• Legal Processing
• Military, civil, or criminal investigation activity
• Pending legal discharge or separation
• Sole Survivor / Surviving Family member
• Conscientious Objector
• Under the age of 18
• Inadequate Family Care Plan
• Parenthood or Adoption
• Postpartum Operational Deferment.
Not under direct operational control
COCOM
COCOMs have specific deployment criteria that apply to their assigned mission
Reference: SECARMY Directive 2016-07
40Slide41
Assigned MOS Skills Match
Assigned MOS Skills Match Strength
=
Soldiers assigned and attachedwho are currently possess the training and skills necessary toperform effectively in the duty position currently slotted (ALARACT 110/2013).
Assigned MOS Skills Match= Asgn/Atch MOS Skill Match ÷ Required Strength X 100
P-level 1 2 3 4
Assigned 100-85% 84-75% 74-65% 64% or less
MOS Skill
Match
41Slide42
Senior Grade Composite Level
Deployable Senior-grade composite level =
Aggregation of the discrete levels
for each of the five categories of senior-grade personnel: Junior NCO (E4(P) - E6) Junior Officer (O1 - O3) Senior NCO (E6(P) - E9) Senior Officer (O3(P) - O6) Warrant Officer (W1 - W5)
Deployable Senior Grade
Level
By Category
Composite1100 - 85% 1.54 or less
2
84 - 75%
1.55 - 2.44
374 - 65% 2.45 - 3.34464% or less 3.35 or moreComposite Example
Jr NCO
87%
P-1
Sr NCO
72%
P-3
WO
94%
P-1
Jr Off
65%
P-3
Sr Off
97%
P-1
(9)
9 ÷ 5 = 1.8
P-2
42Slide43
Calculate Personnel – Level (P-level)
43
Step 1
: Assigned Strength is entered into CUSR, does not factor into P-rating
Step 2
: Calculations must be performed for all three personnel categories below. Each is entered into CUSR
Personnel Category
ASSIGNED STRENGTH
A) DEPLOYABLE STRENGTH
B) ASSIGNED MOS SKILLS MATCH
C) DEPLOYABLE SR GRADE COMPOSITE
Personnel Status Calculations
(Assigned Strength ÷ Required Strength) x 100
(Deployable Strength ÷ Required Strength)
x 100
(Assigned MOS Skills match personnel ÷ Required Strength) x 100
(Sr Grade Strength ÷ Required Senior-Grade) Strength x 100 (by category); apply percentage to reference table to determine a level for the category; average the category levels and apply to reference table to determine overall composite SG level
Step 3
: Unit P-Level is based on the
lowest
(worst case) personnel status percentage calculation. (e.g., If a unit is P1 for deployable strength and assigned MOS skills match strength, but is P3 for deployable senior grade strength, then the unit is P3)
P Level
Deployable Strength %
P Level
Assigned MOS Skills Strength %
P Level
Deployable Sr Grade Strength %
P1
100-90%
P1
100-85%
P1
100-85%
P2
89-80%
P2
84-75%
P2
84-75%
P3
79-70%
P3
74-65%
P3
74-65%
P4
69% or less
P4
64% or less
P4
64% or lessSlide44
Additional Personnel
Data Points
44Slide45
Precise and concise. Closely reviewed routinely by resource managers and senior leaders at higher headquarters.
Identify urgent concerns requiring immediate actions.
The Commander of the reporting unit is solely responsible for:the accuracy of the information and data entered by their unit in the USR
ensuring readiness deficiencies, if any, are clearly explained and are neither masked or exaggerated.USR Comments (1 of 2)45Slide46
Good USR Comments (Specific)Unit is currently substituting 40 excess 11B and 91D to fill 88M shortages.
If unit does not receive 10-13R prior to deployment, it will be short one (1) target acquisition section.
Bad USR Comments (Vague)Personnel shortages are in Combat Arms MOS.A shortage of deployable personnel is our greatest readiness concern.
Unit is short drivers.We have senior grade personnel shortages.We are short intelligence and signal analysts.Unit is not filled to Army Average in signal MOS.USR
Comments
(2 of 2)46Slide47
Check on Learning47
Q. What are the three metrics used to calculate P-Level?
A. Total Deployable Strength
Assigned MOS Skills Match Deployable Senior Grade Composite Level
Q. What document is used to determine Required Strength?
A. MTOE or TDA
Q. What are the four Medical Readiness Categories?
A.
MR1 -
Medically Ready /
Deployable
MR2 - Partially Medically Ready / Deployable
MR3 -
Not Medically Ready /
Non-Deployable
; commander
determines deployability for: DL1 – Temp Profile > 14
days; DL2 – Dental Readiness Class 3
MR4 -
Not Medically Ready /
Nondeployable
and Commander
determines deployability (default is nondeployable)Slide48
Defense Readiness Reporting System – Army (DRRS-A)
48Slide49
User interface for DRRS-A is NetUSR.
Secure, web-based information system. Resource information provided via
authoritative databases and not via input from individual units. Units use the NetUSR tool to determine and communicate their status and mission capabilities.
Transforms the Army’s business processes and mindset for reporting readiness.49
DRRS-A OverviewSlide50
Focuses on unit readiness primarily by assessing unit capability with Mission Essential Tasks (Y/Q/N) in addition to standard resource metrics (P/R/S/T).
Requires Services to provide OSD access to authoritative databases (personnel, equipment, training, medical, real property, etc.).
Allows planners at all levels to bridge the “knowledge gap” between readiness status, war plans and COAs. OSD, COCOMs, JS and Services can have access to current unit level information to facilitate sourcing, deployment and operational employment decisions.
Answers “ready for what?” questions posed by the OSD, the COCOMs and JS.What is DRRS-A?50Slide51
Core TasksArmy units develop and report readiness against Core METs based on appropriate TOE and MTP for the “type” unit.
Core Tasks become the basis for assessment by units in ARFORGEN. Unit Commander considers MTOE resources in assessment of ability to execute unit core mission.
Named Operations (OND, OIR)Army units sourced for named operation, or provided a non-standard or “in lieu of” mission, are considered to have a directed mission. They will develop METL and report readiness based on that directed mission.Unit Commander considers mission required resources in assessment of ability to execute directed mission.
Major Plans (Korea Peninsula War Plans) Army two-star headquarters and theater strategic commands develop and report MET for Major Plans when directed by HQDA/ASCC.Capabilities Measured in DRRS-A
51Slide52
52
Web-based Army readiness input tool.
Net-centric component of DRRS-A.
Facilitates entering / reviewing readiness
status information.
Data entry for:
Basic unit information
Equipment on-hand status / equipment readiness status
Personnel status
Training status
Automated selection/retrieval of MTOE information.
Services retrieve data from automated systems for readiness status reports.
Readiness information processed using NetUSR.
NetUSR Personnel Menu
NetUSR OverviewSlide53
NetUSR Types of Reports
Regular Report-
Full report routinely submitted monthly by NON-DEPLOYED COMPO 1 units, by NON-DEPLOYED RC units while on active duty status, and by designated RC units when directed or following their formal alert for deployment. Validation Report- Intra-quarterly report routinely submitted by designated Generating Force units, APS custodians and by USAR and ARNG units that are not mobilized or on active duty status.
Deployed Report- Abbreviated report meeting the minimum information and status reporting requirements that is routinely submitted monthly by a DEPLOYED unit. Composite Report- “Regular” report that is routinely prepared and submitted by major units and major headquarters (brigade level and above).
Composite Report-Type II- Abbreviated special report submitted monthly by designated NON-DEPLOYED COMPO 1 units/headquarters and by designated NON DEPLOYED RC major units/headquarters.
Installation Status Report - Quarterly special report submitted by designated Army installations; measures the facility’s infrastructure readiness based on physical capitalized infrastructure measurements contained in the ISR.
DUIC Special Reports- Abbreviated special report for deployed/non-deployed ad-hoc elements or entities.
Generating Force Short Report- Generating Forces Short Report - Modified report submitted quarterly by TDA non-deployable (generating force units) that have no authoritative data available.
DA PAM 220-1, table 3-1Slide54
Check on Learning54
Q. Briefly explain what DRRS-A is and what it provides to the Department of Defense.
A. DRRS-A is a mission-focused, capabilities-based, common framework that provides the combatant commanders, military services, Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), and other key DoD users a data-driven environment and tools in which to evaluate, in near real-time, the readiness and capability of U.S. Armed Forces to carry out assigned and potential tasks.Slide55
Summary55
The culture of
Readiness in the Army is changing.
S-1s / HR professionals play a significant role in force readiness and unit status reporting.Use the “system of record” (eMILPO/ SIDPERS) and make data accuracy a priority.
Be
credible in reporting.Manage readiness
at your level as you would expect it to be managed by higher headquarters.Become the “subject matter expert”
in strength management and personnel / medical readiness in your organization.Make higher HQ your allies.
“Readiness is my #1 priority.”
GEN Mark A. Milley, CSASlide56
LESSON OUTCOME
This lesson provides information on personnel and medical readiness transformation, HQDA reporting policies and procedures, and preparing USR personnel readiness data. At the conclusion of this lesson, students are enabled to communicate the redesigned personnel and medical readiness deployablity standards, review / prepare personnel readiness data for USR, and calculate personnel-level (P-Level) metrics.
.
21ST CENTURY COMPETENCIES
Accountability and Initiative
Lifelong Learner Teamwork and Collaboration
Communication and Engagement
Tactical and Technical Competence
TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE
ACTION:
Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for Unit Status Reporting (USR)
CONDITIONS: In a classroom environment, given access to AR 220-1, DA PAM 220-1, Army Directive 2016-07 (Redesign of Personnel Readiness and Medical Deployability), eMILPO Training Database, USR personnel and medical readiness data, and awareness of Operational Environment (OE) variables and actors.STANDARD: With a minimum of 70% accuracy, students must: 1. Assess the personnel and medical readiness deployability standards of unit personnel.2. Review USR personnel readiness data and HQDA reporting policies.3. Calculate the unit’s overall Personnel Level (P-Level).
Terminal Learning Objective
56Slide57
Conduct Practical Exercise for Prepare Personnel Readiness Data for USR
Practical Exercise
57