LeAnn Grogan P utney PhD Educational Psychology amp Higher Education Professor and Departmen t Chair University of Nevada Las Vegas Joan Wink PhD Professor Emerita California State University Stanislaus ID: 567030
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Qualitative Program Evaluation Research:..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Qualitative Program Evaluation Research: Employing the Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application (CARMA)
LeAnn Grogan Putney, PhDEducational Psychology & Higher Education Professor and Department ChairUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasJoan Wink, PhDProfessor EmeritaCalifornia State University, Stanislaus
joan@joanwink.com
EQRC – Las Vegas, NV
February 11, 2014
putneyl@unlv.nevada.eduSlide2
YOU DO KNOW THESE HEAPS OF DATA NEED MORE ANALYSIS, RIGHT?
…I TOLD YOU TO USE CARMA TO GET OUT OF THE HEAPS AND OVER TO CONCEPTS!Slide3
Vygotsky’s Conceptual Development – AKA, THE HEAPS3
Heaps
Complexes
Concepts
Generalized understandings
Group similar items
Connections among itemsSlide4
Critical Action/Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application (CARMA)4
CARMA helps you move from Heaps of Data to Complexes of Relationships toConcepts related to a theoretical perspective or producing a grounded theory Putney, L. G., Wink, J & Perkins, P. (2006). Teachers as Researchers: Using the Critical Action Research Matrix Application for Reflexive Classroom Inquiry. Florida Journal of Teacher Education, Vol IX, p. 23 - 35.Slide5
5
NOTE-TAKING
EXPECTATIONS
Who are the intended participants?
Who is supposed to provide what service?
How are participants to be served?
What will be produced in the activity?
NOTE-TAKING
EVIDENT IMPLEMENTATION
Who are the actual participants?
Who is actually providing what service?
How are participants actually served?
What is actually being produced?
NOTE-MAKING / ALIGNMENT OR DEPARTURE?
Compare/contrast expected with evident using Action Researcher Interpretations
For each question do you see alignment or departure?
o
What
might be the implications?
NOTE-REMAKING / RECOMMENDATIONS/
Modify or maintain program activity?
In what ways?
For which participants?
With what intended outcomes?Slide6
Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application [CARMA]6Slide7
Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application (CARMA)7
Content of fieldnotesNoteTakingDescriptions of setting/people/activitiesMapping of physical spaceDirect quotes or substance of what was saidNote Making Observer comments in margins – interpretations & questionsNote RemakingWhat did you learn – maintain or modify?Reflective Cycle – transformative stageSlide8
Potential Uses for CARMA8
Program evaluation Applied classroom research Self study (action research) orTeam approach with classroom teacherEducational researchSchool wide behavioral practiceSingle-sex based classesComparison of several schools – English Language Learners in high ranking schools for “best practices”Policy analysisCritical incident studySlide9
Scale of use9
MicroMacroLessonClassroomSchoolDistrictCommunity
StateNational
Continental
GlobalUnit/Project/Lesson/Guest speaker (Teacher’s, Speaker’s, and Students’ expectations)
Classroom
project/
Tolerance
School-wide project/Action
Research – 111 teachers
District-wide project/
Empowerment
Community-wide/Hospice – EPY 716
2008/Critical Incident dissertationSlide10
Scale of use10
State-wide project/Proposition 227 in California- dissertationNational-level project/No child Left Behind policy analysis – dissertationContinental level/Quality Assurance in European Higher Education Area - policy analysis – dissertationGlobal level/recommendations for future research studiesMicroMacroLesson
ClassroomSchool
DistrictCommunity
StateNationalContinental
GlobalSlide11
Participant discussionFor your own research, what WAS YOUR intended vs enacted?DID YOU ENCOUNTER WHAT YOU EXPECTED?DO YOU NEED TO COLLECT MORE DATA OR ARE YOU SEEING REPEATING PATTERNS?
11CARMA APPLIED TO YOUSlide12
Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application (CARMA)12
WHAT - Tool for critical evaluation, to help the researcher/evaluator to describe and interpret what is being accomplished in the setting, and in what ways the cultural space is being utilized by the participants, bymeasuring program expectations, against evident implementation of practices and outcomes, from the perspectives of all levels of participants (Putney, Wink & Perkins, 2006). Slide13
Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application (CARMA)13
WHY - Roots of CARMA:Vygotskian view of life as a social construction, steeped in the context of our cultural experiencesto evaluate whether the context of a program is meeting the needs of the constituents, we would have to determine what the constituents and program administrators are socially constructing through the program implementation . Slide14
Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application (CARMA)14
WHY - Roots of CARMA:Ethnographic perspective of learning from people about their cultural patterns of interaction (Agar, SBCDG)people, who work in a common setting for individual yet related purposes, begin to co-construct norms and expectations for being together in their local time and space . Slide15
Complementary Analysis Research Matrix Application (CARMA)15
HOW – Observations and Interviews of constituentsFieldnotes – written account of observationsContinuous notes, jottings, head notes,“cooked up”Slide16
teacher’s reflections on her own practice16
Example from action researchPutney, L. G., Wink, J & Perkins, P. (2006). Teachers as Researchers: Using the Critical Action Research Matrix Application for Reflexive Classroom Inquiry. Florida Journal of Teacher Education, Vol IX, p. 23 - 35.Slide17
Step 1 – NoteTaking Notations on classroom expectations17Slide18
Step 2 – Notetaking from observations what is evident 18Slide19
Step 3 – results and conclusions after contrastive analysis 19Slide20
Step 4 - Recommendations - decisions20