Important ideas Explanatory always on x axis horizontal Response always on y axis vertical DOFS Direction Outliers Form Strength Correlation Coefficient The correlation r is a measure of the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two quantitative variables ID: 1027462
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Do Now Describe the following relationsh..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1.
2. Do NowDescribe the following relationships
3. Important ideasExplanatory- always on x axis (horizontal)Response – always on y axis (vertical)D.O.F.SDirectionOutliersFormStrength
4. Correlation CoefficientThe correlation r is a measure of the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two quantitative variables. • The correlation r is a value between -1 and 1 (-1 ≤ r ≤ 1). • If the relationship is negative, then r < 0. If the relationship is positive, then r > 0. • If r =1 or r = -1, then there is a perfect linear relationship. In other words, all of the points will be exactly on a line. • If there is very little scatter from the linear form, then r is close to 1 or -1. The more scatter from the linear form, the closer r is to 0.
5.
6.
7. Do NowHomework out!
8. Lesson 2.4: Calculating CorrelationObjectivesCalculate the correlation between two quantitative variables. Apply the properties of the correlation. Describe how outliers influence the correlation.
9. Calculating the Correlation1. Find the mean and the standard deviation Sx of the explanatory variable. Calculate the z-score for the value of the explanatory variable for each individual. 2. Find the mean and the standard deviation Sy of the response variable. Calculate the z-score for the value of the response variable for each individual. 3. For each individual, multiply the z-score for the explanatory variable and the z-score for the response variable. 4. Add the z-score products and divide the sum by n-1. Here is the formula:
10.
11. The table shows the foot length (in centimeters) and the height (in centimeters) for a random sample of six high school seniors. Calculate the correlation for these data.
12. Make a table to help you organize
13. Solution
14. Solution
15. Calculator Time!Hit 2nd 0 (Brings us to CATALOG)Scroll alllllll the way down to DiagnosticON (you only need to do this once, unless your calculator is reset or you use a different one)Hit enter And enter again. Should say “Done”Enter data into L1 and L2 (Stat-Edit)Then Stat-Calc –LinReg (a+bx) This is #8, not #4r is your correlation coefficient!
16. To see the scatter plotGo to Stat Plot (2nd y=) and make sure plot1 is onIt should also be set to scatterThen hit ZOOM Stat (#9)
17. If I give you homework….You can use this website at home: https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/pearson/
18. You try!Find r, state the type of correlation. Confirm by looking at the scatterplot.
19. Properties of CorrelationCorrelation makes no distinction between explanatory and response variables. It makes no difference which variable you call x and which you call y in calculating the correlation. As you can see in the formula, reversing the roles of x and y would only change the order of the multiplication, not the product
20. Likewise, the scatterplots in the figure show the same direction and strength, even though the variables are reversed in the second scatterplot.
21. Because r uses the standardized values of the observations, r does not change when we change the units of measurement of x, y, or both. Measuring foot length and height in inches rather than centimeters does not change the correlation between foot length and height. The figure on the next page gives two scatterplots of the same six students. The graph on the left (a) uses centimeters for both measurements, and the graph on the right (b) uses inches for both measurements. The strength and direction are identical—only the scales on the axes have changed.
22.
23. The correlation r has no units of measurement because we are using standardized values in the calculation and standardized values have no units.
24. You try!The scatterplot shows the relationship between 40-yarddash times and long-jump distances. The correlation is r = -0.838. What would happen to the correlation if long-jump distance was plotted on the horizontal axis and dash time was plotted on the vertical axis? Explain. What would happen to the correlation if long-jump distance was measured in feet instead of inches? Explain. Sabrina claims that the correlation between long-jump distance and dash time is r = -0.838 inches per second. Is this correct?
25. SolutionThe correlation would still be r = -0.838 because the correlation makes no distinction between explanatory and response variables.The correlation would still be r = -0.838 because the correlation doesn’t change when we change the units of either variable. No. The correlation doesn’t have units, so including “inches per second” is incorrect.
26. Check your understanding- Exit Ticket