PPT-IN- class wrıtıng Writing and Discussion-1 / Reasonable Arguments versus Pseudo-Arguments

The following questions can all be answered in alternative ways However not all of them will lead to reasonable arguments Your goal is to show your understanding of the difference between reasonable arguments and pseudoarguments. Attaining depth. Analyzing Evidence in Depth: “10 on 1”.  How do you move from (a) making details speak and (b) explaining how evidence confirms and qualifies the claim to composing a paper?. Phrased as a general rule 10 on 1 holds that . Norma Dillard. Spartanburg Writing Project. June, 2014. >Roadblock. >Description. >3 practice activities. *political. *video. *DBQ. >. Goals. >Summation/Q&A. Agenda. I am constantly challenged to create new and innovative ways to enhance my students’ interest in topics related to Social Studies, and to help them enhance their abilities to formulate points of view using evidence and prior knowledge. A major portion of this task includes effective . Speaker’s Development, Week . 7. Karolien . Michiels. Following the Burden. Both sides of a debate can necessarily make good arguments (otherwise the motion is bad). So it is not just about making arguments, it is about making arguments that matter. Have a Point. Easy to say; frequently difficult to do. Each sentence should have a point that is connected to the other sentences in the paragraph (and the larger argument). Focus on facts and law that advance that point. Katarzyna. . Gromek. . Broc. University of York. Your essay. how . to make the essay more analytical than descriptive, how to acknowledge sources in a more interesting way, how to engage the reader with the vibrant discussion and how to link the arguments together.. Make Your Reading Count!. Rebekka. Andersen. University Writing Program, Workshop Program. November 6, . 2010. Question. :. how often do you read an article . or book . and later forget the main arguments and/or significance of those arguments? . Sake…. Writing . Counter-arguments and Rebuttals. ENDURING UNDERSTANDING. 1. In . order to . write a convincing essay . you may need to . anticipate common opposing arguments. . that dispute your thesis. Reading and Understanding. Arguments. Getting Started. If you have your computer or mobile device with you the following may be useful.. Go to . http://. iwp.iweb.bsu.edu/profdev/tech13.htm. Download and save The Art of Argument PowerPoint. Writing for an Academic . A. udience.. Hosted by. English Writing Center. www.uta.edu/owl. uta-wci@uta.edu. A Division of the Department of English. Sponsored by the College of Liberal Arts . www.uta.edu/owl. J. . Sebasti. án. Tello. Iván Jiménez. Center . for. . Conservation. and . Sustainable. . Development. Missouri Botanical Garden. 3 fundamental concepts:. Function. Argument. Object. 2. . Functions and Arguments. ENC 1101. FIU. Tue & Thu. 3:00 – 5: 00p.m.. Week . 7. March 9. &. 11 . Agendas. Collect 10 . MORE. Study Cards. Jump Drives & Books:. Research Process, Source Cards, & Library Passes. as . Argument. Sharon Radcliff. Library Faculty CSU East Bay & . USF School of Education . Learning and Instruction Doctoral Program. Abstract:. The ability to understand more than one point of view, critique and create arguments is a widely accepted learning objective for any student engaged in a liberal arts education. As Gerald Graff states: “This . UHCL Writing Center. Spring 2015. Why is writing a process?. pro-. cess. (. n. .) a series of actions to produce something or that lead to a particular result. Writers follow a process when writing, which can be unique to the type of writing as well as the writer. Developed by Jenny . Alme. , The . Harker. School. BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE. If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. . . You . need to prove that the affirmative is better than the status quo.