/
RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The effects of pre versus post workout supplementation of RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The effects of pre versus post workout supplementation of

RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The effects of pre versus post workout supplementation of - PDF document

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
503 views
Uploaded On 2014-11-24

RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The effects of pre versus post workout supplementation of - PPT Presentation

Furthermore there is robust evidence that muscular strength and power will also increase after supplementing with creatine However it is not known if the timing of creatine supplementation will affect the adaptive response to exercise Thus the purpo ID: 15896

Furthermore there robust

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The effects..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

RESEARCHARTICLEOpenAccess Theeffectsofpreversuspostworkout supplementationofcreatinemonohydrateon bodycompositionandstrength JoseAntonio * andVictoriaCiccone Abstract Chronicsupplementationwithcreatinemonohydratehasbeenshowntopromoteincreasesintotal intramuscularcreatine,phosphocreatine,skeletalmusclemass,leanbodymassandmusclefibersize.Furthermore, thereisrobustevidencethatmuscularstrengthandpowerwillalsoincreaseaftersupplementingwithcreatine. However,itisnotknownifthetimingofcreatinesupplementationwillaffecttheadaptiveresponsetoexercise. Thus,thepurposeofthisinvestigationwastodeterminethedifferencebetweenpreversuspostexercise supplementationofcreatineonmeasuresofbodycompositionandstrength. Methods: Nineteenhealthyrecreationalmalebodybuilders(mean±SD;age:23.1±2.9;height:166.0±23.2cm; weight:80.18±10.43kg)participatedinthisstudy.Subjectswererandomlyassignedtooneofthefollowing groups:PRE-SUPPorPOST-SUPPworkoutsupplementationofcreatine(5grams).ThePRE-SUPPgroupconsumed 5gramsofcreatineimmediatelybeforeexercise.Ontheotherhand,thePOST-SUPPgroupconsumed5grams immediatelyafterexercise.Subjectstrainedonaveragefivedaysperweekforfourweeks.Subjectsconsumedthe supplementonthetwonon-trainingdaysattheirconvenience.Subjectsperformedaperiodized,split-routine, bodybuildingworkoutfivedaysperweek(Chest-shoulders-triceps;Back-biceps,Legs,etc.).Bodycomposition (BodPod®)and1-RMbenchpress(BP)weredetermined.Dietlogswerecollectedandanalyzed(onerandom dayperweek;fourtotaldaysanalyzed). Results: 2x2ANOVAresults-Therewasasignificanttimeeffectforfat-freemass(FFM)(F=19.9;p=0.001)andBP (F=18.9;p0.001),however,fatmass(FM)andbodyweightdidnotreachsignificance.Whilethereweretrends, nosignificantinteractionswerefound.However,usingmagnitude-basedinference,supplementationwithcreatine postworkoutispossiblymorebeneficialincomparisontopreworkoutsupplementationwithregardstoFFM,FM and1-RMBP.ThemeanchangeinthePRE-SUPPandPOST-SUPPgroupsforbodyweight(BWkg),FFM(kg),FM (kg)and1-RMbenchpress(kg)wereasfollows,respectively:Mean±SD;BW:0.4±2.2vs.0.8±0.9;FFM:0.9±1.8vs. 2.0±1.2;FM:-0.1±2.0vs.  1.2±1.6;BenchPress1-RM:6.6±8.2vs.7.6±6.1. Qualitativeinferencerepresentsthelikelihoodthatthetruevaluewillhavetheobservedmagnitude.Furthermore, therewerenodifferencesincaloricormacronutrientintakebetweenthegroups. Conclusions: Creatinesupplementationplusresistanceexerciseincreasesfat-freemassandstrength.Basedonthe magnitudeinferencesitappearsthatconsumingcreatineimmediatelypost-workoutissuperiortopre-workoutvisa visbodycompositionandstrength. Keywords: Creatine,Supplementtiming,Bodycomposition,Fatfreemass,Dietarysupplement *Correspondence: ja839@nova.edu ExerciseandSportsSciences,NovaSoutheasternUniversity,3532S. ©2013AntonioandCiccone;licenseeBioMedCentralLtd.ThisisanOpenAccessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0),whichpermitsunrestricteduse, distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited. AntonioandCiccone JournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition 2013, 10 :36 http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36 IntroductionChronicsupplementationwithcreatinehasbeenshowntoincreaseleanbodymassandenhanceexerciseper-formance[1-10].Creatinesupplementationforasbriefaperiodas3dayshasbeenshowntoproduceasignifi-cantincreaseinskeletalmusclevolumeandexerciseperformanceaccordingtoZiegenfussetal.[9].Oneweekofsupplementationhasbeenshowntoincreasebodyweight1.4kg(range0.00to2.7kg)[11].Further-more,creatinesupplementationcombinedwithresist-ancetrainingresultedina6.3%increaseinbodyweightandfat-freemassaftera12weektreatmentperiod[12].Subjectswithinitiallylowlevelsofintramuscularcreat-ine(e.g.vegetarians)aremoreresponsivetosupplemen-tationthanthosewhoregularlyconsumemeat[13].However,notallinvestigationsdemonstrateapositiveeffectofcreatinesupplementationvisavisbodycom-position[14-18].Ithasnotyetbeenfullyelucidatedwhateffectnutri-enttiming(i.e.consumingnutrientspre,duringand/orpostworkout)hasontheadaptiveresponsetoexercise[19-24].However,basedonthepreponderanceofevi-dence,itisapparentthatconsumingthepropernutri-entsduringtheperiworkouttimeperiodmayenhanceleanbodymassandexpediteskeletalmusclerecovery[25-29].Forinstance,Tiptonetal.demonstratedthatconsuminganessentialaminoacidsolutionprework-outresultedinagreaternetmuscleproteinsynthesisthanthatwhenthesolutionisconsumedafterexercise;thisincreaseinmuscleproteinsynthesisisbelievedtobetheresultofanincreaseddeliveryofaminoacidstotheleg[29].CribbandHayesdiscoveredthatconsum-ingaprotein-carbohydrate-creatinesupplementimme-diatelypreandpostworkoutresultedingreatergainsinleanbodymass,musclefibersizeandmuscularstrengthincomparisontomorningandeveningcon-sumption[25].Itisapparentthatthetimingofnutri-entintakedoesindeedaffecttheadaptiveresponsetoexercisebutitisnotknownifthereisadifferencebetweenpreversuspostworkoutconsumptionofasupplementornutrientcombination.Therefore,thepurposeofthisinvestigationwastodetermineiftherewasadifferenceinpreversuspostworkoutsupple-mentationofcreatineonbodycompositionandmus-cularstrength.Nineteenmalerecreationalbodybuilders(mean±SD:age,23.1±2.9years;height,166.0±23.2cm;bodyweight,80.2±10.4kg)completedthisstudy.Parti-cipantswereotherwisehealthycollege-agestudentswhohadbeenresistancetrainingregularlyforoverayear.Individualswhowerecurrentlyconsumingotherworkoutsupplementsorergogenicaidswereinstructedtoimmediatelystopconsumptionandcompleteatleastafour-weekwashoutperiodbeforeenteringthestudy.Allproceduresinvolvinghumansubjectswereap-provedbyNovaSoutheasternUniversitysHumanSub-jectsInstitutionalReviewBoardinaccordancewiththeHelsinkiDeclaration,andwritteninformedconsentwasobtainedpriortoparticipation.ExperimentaldesignSubjectswererandomlyassignedtooneoftwogroups:aPRE-SUPPorPOST-SUPPgroup.ThePRE-SUPPgroupconsumed5gramsofcreatinemonohydrateimmediatelypriortotraining.ThePOST-SUPPgroupconsumedthesameamountofcreatineimmediatelyaftertraining.Fol-lowingpre-testingdatacollection,participantsbeganaperiodizedfour-weekresistancetrainingprogramthatwasself-administered.Onoff-trainingdays,subjectsconsumedcreatineattheirconvenience.Thetotaltreat-mentdurationwasfourweeks.ResistancetrainingprotocolAllsubjectsfollowedaperiodized,split-routinebody-buildingtrainingregimengearedprimarilyforskeletalmusclehypertrophy.Theparticipantstrained5daysaweekfor4weeksforatotalof20trainingsessions.Eachtrainingsessionlastedapproximately60minutes.Theprogramwasasfollows:Week1Chest,Shoulder,Triceps(3×15,sets×reps;doesnotinclude2warmupsets)Hips,Legs(3×15)Back,Biceps(3×15)Chest,Shoulders,Triceps(3×10)Hips,Legs(3×10)Sun-RESTWeek2Back,Biceps(3×10)Chest,Shoulder,Triceps(3×5)Hips,Legs(3×5)Back,Biceps(3×5)Chest,Shoulder,Triceps(3×15)Week3Hips,Legs(3×15)Back,Biceps(3×15)Chest,Shoulders,Triceps(3×10)Hips,Legs(3×10)Back,Biceps(3×10)AntonioandCicconeJournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition:36Page2of8http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36 Week4Chest,Shoulders,Triceps(3×5)Hips,Legs(3×5)Back,Biceps(3×5)Chest,Shoulder,Triceps(3×15)Hip,Legs(3×15)Choiceofexercisesforeachbodypartsplit(subjectperformed3ofthese)flatbenchpress,inclinebenchpress,cablecross-overs,pecdeck,flatbenchflies,declinebenchpress;Shoulders(subjectperformed3ofthese)uprightrow,machinemilitarypress,dumbbelloverheadpresses,lateraldumbbellraises,shouldershrugs;Triceps(subjectperformedtwoofthese)tricepspushdowns,dips,Frenchpress;Back(subjectperformedfourofthese)Widegriplatpulldown,narrowgriplatpulldown,chinups,cablerows,dumbbellrows,dumbbellflies;Biceps(subjectperformedthreeofthese)standingbarbellcurls,standingEZbarcurl,concentrationcurls,preachercurls,hammercurls;Legs/Hips(subjectperformedfiveofthese)Backsquats,Smithmachinesquats,LegPress,Lunges,Legcurls,Legextensions,calfraise(seatedorstanding),Stiff-leggeddeadlift.Ontestdays,participantsreportedtoNSUsExerciseandSportsSci-encelabaftera3hourfastandrefrainedfrompartici-patinginvigorousactivityorexerciseinthe24-hourperiodpriortotesting.Subjectswereaskedtomaintaintheirnormaldietaryintakeforthedurationofthestudyandtorefrainfromingestinganyotherdietarysupple-mentthatmayenhancebodycomposition(e.g.protein,aminoacids,etc.).Fooddiary,workoutlog,bodycompositionSubjectsprovideda24-hourdietrecallononerandomdayonweek1,2,3,and4(asdeterminedbythein-vestigators).DietaryintakewasmeasuredusingtheNutribase®program.Heightwasmeasuredusingstandardanthropometryandtotalbodyweightwasmeasuredusingacalibratedscale.BodycompositionwasassessedbywholebodydensitometryusingairdisplacementviatheBodPod®(COSMEDUSA,Concord,CA).Alltestingwasperformedinaccordancewiththemanufacturersinstruc-tions.Briefly,subjectsweretestedwhilewearingonlytightfittingclothing(swimsuitorundergarments)andanacrylicswimcap.Thesubjectsworetheexactsamecloth-ingforalltesting.ThoracicgasvolumewasestimatedforallsubjectsusingapredictiveequationintegraltotheBodPod®software.ThecalculatedvalueforbodydensityusedtheSiriequationtoestimatebodycomposition.DatafromtheBodPod®includedbodyweight,%bodyfat,fatfreemassandfatmass.Alltestingwasdonewitheachsubjectatthesametimeofday(plusorminus1hour).Also,allsubjectswererequiredtokeepaworkoutlogshowingtheexerciseswithrepsandsetsperformed.ExerciseperformanceassessmentSubjectsperformeda1repetitionmaximumlifts(1-RM)onthebenchpress.Subjectswarmedup(2setsof8repetitionsatapproximately50%ofanticipatedmaximum)onthebenchpress.Subjectsperformedsuccessive1-RMliftsstartingatabout70%ofanticipated1-RMandin-creaseditby510lbsuntilthereachinga1-RM.Therewasatwominuterestintervalbetweensets.Eachsubjectwasallowedamaximumofthreeattempts.StatisticalanalysisDatawereanalyzedutilizingfiveseparate2-way[group(Pre-Treatment[akaPRE-SUPP]vs.Post-Treatment[akaPOST-SUPP])×time(prevs.post)]AnalysisofVariance(ANOVA).Whenappropriate,follow-upanalysisin-cludedpairedsample-test.Analphalevelwassetat0.05,andallanalyseswereperformedusingPASWversion18.0(SPSS,Inc.,Chicago,IL).Theeffectsofnu-trienttimingplusresistanceexercisewerecalculatedasthechangesfrompretrainingtopost-trainingbodycom-positionandperformancemeasurementsamongPre-Treatmentvs.Post-Treatmentgroups.Magnitude-basedinferenceswereusedtoidentifyclinicaldifferencesinthemeasurementchangesbetweenthePre-TreatmentandPost-Treatment.Severalstudieshavesupportedtheuseofmagnitude-basedinferencestatisticsasacomple-mentarytoolfornullhypothesistestingtoreduceerrorsininterpretationandtoprovidemoreclinicallymean-ingfulresults[30,31].Theprecisionofthemagnitudein-ferencewassetat90%confidencelimits,usingapvaluederivedfromanindependent-test.Thresholdvaluesforpositiveandnegativeeffectwerecalculatedbymultiply-ingstandarddeviationsofbaselinevaluesby20%[30].Inferencesontruedifferencesbetweentheexerciseandcontrolgroupweredeterminedaspositive,trivial,ornegativeaccordingtomethodspreviouslydescribedbyBatterhamandHopkins[31].Inferenceswerebasedontheconfidenceintervalrangerelativetothesmallestclinicallymeaningfuleffecttobepositive,trivial,ornegative.Unclearresultsarereportediftheobservedconfidenceintervaloverlapsbothpositiveandnegativevalues.Theprobabilityoftheeffectwasevaluatedaccordingtothefollowingscale::mostunlikely;0.5-5%,veryunlikely;5-25%,unlikely;25-75%,possibly;75-95%,likely;9599.5%,verylikely;�.5%;&#x,-39;.10;က99.5%,mostlikely(Hopkins,2010).Twenty-twosubjectswereinitiallyrecruitedforthisin-vestigation.ThreesubjectsdroppedoutfornogivenAntonioandCicconeJournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition:36Page3of8http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36 reason.Nineteenhealthyrecreationalmalebodybuilders(age:23.1±2.9;height:166.0±23.2cm;weight:80.2±10.4kg)completedthestudy.Therewerenodifferencesbetweengroupsforanyofthebaselinemeasures.2×2ANOVAresults-TherewasasignificanttimeeffectforFFW(F=19.9;p=0.001)andBP(F=18.9;p0.001),howeverFMandBWdidnotreachsignificance.Whilethereweretrends,nosignificantinteractionswerefound(Table1).Thus,usingmagnitude-basedinference,supplementa-tionwithcreatinepost-workoutispossiblymorebenefi-cialincomparisontopre-workoutsupplementationwithregardstoFFM,FM(Table2,Figure1,Figure2)and1-RMBP.ItisapparentthateveryoneinthePOST-SUPPgroupimprovedvisavisFFM;however,thiswasnotthecasewiththePRE-SUPPgroup(Figures1and2).DietaryvariablesThemacronutrientintakeforthePRE-SUPPandPOST-SUPPgroupsaresummarizedinTable3.Therewerenosignificantdifferencesbetweenthegroups.Onaverage,bothgroupsconsumedadietof39-40%carbohydrate,26%protein,and35%fat.Bothgroupsconsumed1.9gramsofproteinperkgbodyweight.DiscussionTheresultsfromthisstudysuggestthatconsumingcre-atinemonohydratepostexercisemaybesuperiortocon-sumingitpreexercisewithregardstoimprovingbodycomposition(i.e.gainsinFFM,lossofFM).Thisisthefirstinvestigationtodemonstratethatthetimingofcre-atineintakeaffectstheadaptiveresponsetoexercise.Whensubjectswerepooledtogether,thegainsinfat-freemassandmuscularstrengthinthecurrentinvesti-gationweresimilartoothers.Rugbyunionfootballplayerswhosupplementeddailywithcreatinemono-hydrateoveran8-weekperioddecreasedfatmass1.9kg)andincreasedleantissue(+1.2kg).Theyalsoperformedbetterinbenchandlegpresstests[15].Oldermen(71yrs)whoconsumedcreatineincreasedleantissuemass(+3.3kg)andimprovedlowerbodystrengthasmea-suredusinga1-RM[32].Usingasingle-limbtrainingmodel,menandwomenwhosupplementedwithcreatineaftertrainingofthearmsincreasedtheirmusclethickness.Inter-estingly,maleshadagreaterincreaseinleantissuemasswithcreatinesupplementationthanfemales[4].Inelitemalehandballplayers,creatinesupplementationfor32daysresultedinanincreasein1-RMbenchpress(8.30vs.5.29kg;creatineversuscontrol)[33].Theseandotherinves-tigationsindeedshowthatcreatinesupplementationingen-eralhasasignificantanabolicandperformance-enhancingeffect[34,35]whichisinagreementwiththecurrentinvesti-gation.Mechanistically,creatinesupplementationhasbeenshowntoincreasemusclefibersize,enhancemyosinheavychainproteinsynthesis,activatesatellitecellsaswellasincreasetheconcentrationsofintramuscularATPandPCr[6,7,12,36,37].However,whethersupplementtiminghasaroleintheadaptiveresponsevisaviscreatinehasnotbeenprevi-ouslyinvestigated.Certainly,themostimportantaspectofthecurrentinvestigationisthatpostworkoutsupple-mentationofcreatinemayindeedbesuperiortopreworkoutsupplementation.Dataonproteinandaminoacidsupplementationindicatethatindeedthepre,dur-ingandpostworkoutwindowareimportanttimestoconsumenutrientsthoughsomestudiesdemonstrateaneutraleffect[20-24,38].Onestudyexaminedtheeffectsofasolutionofwheyproteinconsumedeitherimmedi-atelybeforeexerciseorimmediatelyfollowingexercise.Theyfoundnodifferenceinaminoaciduptakebetweenthegroups[18].Insixsubjects(3men,3women)thatrandomlyconsumedatreatmentdrink(6gessentialaminoacids,35gsucrose)oraflavoredplacebodrink1houror3hoursafteraboutofresistanceexercise, Table1BodycompositionandstrengthBaselinePost-testMeanchangePRE-SUPPN=9BW(kg)82.5±10.582.9±10.60.4±2.5POST-SUPPN=1078.1±10.478.9±10.00.8±0.9FFM(kg)66.7±6.967.6±7.60.9±1.865.9±8.067.9±8.62.0±1.2FM(kg)15.4±4.915.3±5.50.1±2.013.00±4.011.8±3.61.2±1.6%BodyFat18.4±4.118.2±5.10.2±2.216.9±4.815.0±4.71.9±2.31-RMBP96.7±21.9103.3±19.56.6±8.2103.2±24.0110.9±25.47.7±6.2Valuesaremean±SD.onerepetitionmaximum,BenchPress,bodyweight,fat-freemass,fatmass.AntonioandCicconeJournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition:36Page4of8http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36 investigatorsfoundnodifferenceintheanabolicresponse whetherthedrinkwasconsumed1houror3hourspost exercise[39].Indeed,othershavefoundthattimedprotein supplementationimmediatelybeforeandafterexercise doesnotfurtherenhancemusclemassorstrengthin healthyelderlymenwhohabituallyconsumeadequate amountsofdietaryprotein[40].Also,timedprotein- supplementingestioninresistance-trainedathletesduring a10-weektrainingprogramdoesnotfurtherenhance strength,power,orbody-compositionchanges[41]. Ontheotherhand,consuminganessentialaminoacid solutionimmediatelybeforeresistanceexerciseelevates muscleproteinsynthesistoagreaterextentthanwhen thesolutionisconsumedafterexercise.Theinvestiga- torspostulatedthatthismaybeduetoanincreasedde- liveryofaminoacidstotheleg[29].Clearly,issues relatedtobloodflowwouldnotbeadvantageoustothe POST-SUPPgroupinthecurrentstudy. Anotherstudyinvestigatedtheimportanceofimmedi- ate(P0)ordelayed(P2:2hourspostexercise)intakeof anoralproteinsupplementuponmusclehypertrophy andstrengthoveraperiodofresistancetrainingineld- erlymales.Inresponsetotraining,thecross-sectional areaofthequadricepsfemorismuscleandmeanfiber areaincreasedintheP0group,whereasnosignificant increasewasobservedinP2.Theseinvestigatorsfound nodifferenceintheglucoseorinsulinresponseatP0or P2,thus,itisnotlikelythatdifferencesinthehormonal environmentcontributedtothedifferenceinmuscle massgain.Thus,theearlyintakeofanoralproteinsup- plementafterresistancetrainingisimportantforskeletal musclehypertrophy[42]. Perhapstheseminalstudyvisavisnutrienttiming comparedtakingaprotein- carbohydrate-creatinesup- plementeitherimmediatelypreandpostexercise(PRE- POST)orinthemorningandevening(MOR-EVE). IndeedthePRE-POSTgroup demonstratedagreater increaseinleanbodymassand1-RMstrengthintwoof threeassessments.Furthermore,typeIImusclefiber cross-sectionalareawasla rgerinthePRE-POSTgroup Table2Magnitude-basedinferenceresults POST-SUPPPRE-SUPP MeasuresMean±SDMean±SDDifference±90CI a QualitativeInference BW(kg) 0.8±0.90.4±2.20.4±1.3Trivial FFM(kg) 2.0±1.20.9±1.81.1±1.2Possiblybeneficial FM(kg)  1.2±1.6  0.1±2.01.1±1.5Possiblybeneficial 1-RMBP(kg) 7.6±6.26.6±8.21.2±1.7Likelybeneficial ChangesinbodycompositionandperformanceinPRE-SUPPvs.POST-SUPPgroups,andqualitativeinferencesabouttheeffectsonbodycompositionandb ench pressstrength. Valuesreportedasmean±standarddeviation(SD); BW bodyweight, FFM fat-freemass, FM fatmass. a ±90%CI:addandsubtractthisnumbertothemean differencetoobtainthe90%confidenceintervalsforthetruedifference.Qualitativeinferencerepresentsthelikelihoodthatthetruevaluewill havethe observedmagnitude. Figure1 IndividualdataforFFMinthePOST-SUPPgroup. AntonioandCiccone JournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition 2013, 10 :36Page5of8 http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36 aswellasintramuscularconcentrationsofcreatineand glycogen[25].Datafromthisinvestigationshowedthe intramuscularcreatineandglycogenconcentrationswere greaterinthePRE-POSTversusMOR-EVEgroups.Thus, takingtheexactsamesupplement(buttimedpreandpost exercise)issignificantlybetterthanconsumingitinthe morningandevening. Ourinvestigationdidnotinvolvetheuseofprotein, carbohydrateoraminoacids.Whethercreatineuptakeis trulysensitivetotimedintakeisnotentirelyknowndes- pitethesuperiorgainsinthePOST-SUPPgroup.More- over,itisentirelypossiblethatthedifferenceinbody compositionandmuscularstrengthbetweenthetwo groupswastheresultofasmallsamplesize.Oneindi- vidualinthePOST-SUPPandthreeindividualsinthe PRE-SUPPgroupexperiencedaminorreductionin FFM.Withregardsto1-RMbenchpressperformance, twosubjectsinthePRE-SUPPgroupshowedeitherno changeoradeclineinstrength;ontheotherhand,only onesubjectinthePOST-SUPPgroupshowednochange instrength.Allothersubjectsexperiencedanincreasein strength. Theuseofrecreationalbodybuildersinthecurrent investigationisadvantageou sbecauseitisdifficultfor highlytrainedindividualstoexperienceanincreasein FFMormuscularstrengthinthetimeframeallottedfor thisstudy.Nonetheless,ofthe19subjectsthatcom- pletedthestudy,16-21%werenon-respondersregard- ingmuscularstrengthandFFM.Itshouldbenotedthat thenutrientintake(kcals,ca rbohydrate,fatandprotein) wassimilarbetweenthegroups.Infact,eachgroup consumedahighproteindiet(1.9gramsofproteinper kgbwdaily);thus,itisnotlikelythatdietaryfactors causedthediscrepancyinth eadaptiveresponsetocre- atinesupplementationandr esistancetraining.Never- theless,anotherconsidera tiontotakeintoaccount wouldbethatbecausetheserecreationalbodybuilders werealreadyconsuminglargequantitiesofprotein,this couldhaveaffectedtheresults(i.e.theycouldalready haveahighamountofcreatinestoredintramuscularly andthismayhavebluntedtheresults). Inconclusion,postworkoutsupplementationwith creatineforaperiodof4weeksinrecreationalbody- buildersmayproducesuperiorgainsinFFMand strengthincomparisontopreworkoutsupplementa- tion.Themajorlimitationsofthisstudyincludethe smallsamplesizeaswellasthebrieftreatmentdur- ation.Futurestudiesshouldinvestigatecreatinesup- plementationusingresistancetrainedindividualsfora longerduration. Figure2 IndividualdataforFFMinthePRE-SUPPgroup. Table3Dietaryintake PRE-SUPPPOST-SUPP Totalkcals 2416±4382575±842 CHOg 229±53261±120 CHOkcal 915±2131046±479 CHO% 39±1140±10 PROg 159±41147±41 PROkcal 637±165590±163 PRO% 26±425±7 FATg 96±39104±48 FATkcal 863±359939±433 FAT% 35±1035±8 Valuesaremean±SD;nosignificantdifferencesforanyofthevariables. CHO carbohydrate, PRO protein. AntonioandCiccone JournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition 2013, 10 :36Page6of8 http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36 CompetinginterestsJoseAntonioPhDwasaformersportsscienceconsultanttoVPX®Sports.VCandJAcontributedsignificantlytoallaspectsofthisstudy.Bothauthorsreadandapprovedthefinalmanuscript.AcknowledgementsThecreatinemonohydrate(CreatinePlasma)wasprovidedbyVPX®Sports,DavieFL.ManythankstoJeffStoutPhDforrunningthestatsonthisproject.Received:9May2013Accepted:10July2013Published:6August20131.AguiarAF,JanuarioRS,JuniorRP,GerageAM,PinaFL,doNascimentoMA,PadovaniCR,CyrinoES:Long-termcreatinesupplementationimprovesmuscularperformanceduringresistancetraininginolderwomen.EurJApplPhysiol2.RawsonES,StecMJ,FredericksonSJ,MilesMP:Low-dosecreatinesupplementationenhancesfatigueresistanceintheabsenceofweight3.GotshalkLA,KraemerWJ,MendoncaMA,VingrenJL,KennyAM,SpieringBA,HatfieldDL,FragalaMS,VolekJS:Creatinesupplementationimprovesmuscularperformanceinolderwomen.EurJApplPhysiol4.ChilibeckPD,StrideD,FarthingJP,BurkeDG:Effectofcreatineingestionafterexerciseonmusclethicknessinmalesandfemales.MedSciSports5.CookeMB,RybalkaE,WilliamsAD,CribbPJ,HayesA:supplementationenhancesmuscleforcerecoveryaftereccentrically-inducedmuscledamageinhealthyindividuals.JIntSocSportsNutr6.SpillaneM,SchochR,CookeM,HarveyT,GreenwoodM,KreiderR,WilloughbyDS:Theeffectsofcreatineethylestersupplementationcombinedwithheavyresistancetrainingonbodycomposition,muscleperformance,andserumandmusclecreatinelevels.JIntSocSportsNutr7.BufordTW,KreiderRB,StoutJR,GreenwoodM,CampbellB,SpanoM,ZiegenfussT,LopezH,LandisJ,AntonioJ:InternationalSocietyofSportsNutritionpositionstand:creatinesupplementationandexercise.JIntSocSportsNutr8.MendelRW,BlegenM,CheathamC,AntonioJ,ZiegenfussT:Effectsofcreatineonthermoregulatoryresponseswhileexercisingintheheat.9.ZiegenfussTN,RogersM,LoweryL,MullinsN,MendelR,AntonioJ,LemonEffectofcreatineloadingonanaerobicperformanceandskeletalmusclevolumeinNCAADivisionIathletes.10.MihicS,MacDonaldJR,McKenzieS,TarnopolskyMA:Acutecreatineloadingincreasesfatfreemass,butdoesnotaffectbloodpressure,plasmacreatinine,orCKactivityinmenandwomen.MedSciSportsExerc11.VolekJS,KraemerWJ,BushJA,BoetesM,IncledonT,ClarkKL,LynchJM:Creatinesupplementationenhancesmuscularperformanceduringhigh-intensityresistanceexercise.JAmDietAssoc12.VolekJS,DuncanND,MazzettiSA,StaronRS,PutukianM,GomezAL,PearsonDR,FinkWJ,KraemerWJ:Performanceandmusclefiberadaptationstocreatinesupplementationandheavyresistancetraining.MedSciSportsExerc13.BurkeDG,ChilibeckPD,PariseG,CandowDG,MahoneyD,TarnopolskyM:Effectofcreatineandweighttrainingonmusclecreatineandperformanceinvegetarians.MedSciSportsExerc14.SakkasGK,MulliganK,DasilvaM,DoyleJW,KhatamiH,SchleichT,Kent-BraunJA,SchambelanM:CreatinefailstoaugmentthebenefitsfromresistancetraininginpatientswithHIVinfection:arandomized,double-blind,placebo-controlledstudy.PLoSOne15.ChilibeckPD,MagnusC,AndersonM:Effectofin-seasoncreatinesupplementationonbodycompositionandperformanceinrugbyunionfootballplayers.ApplPhysiolNutrMetab16.BembenMG,WittenMS,CarterJM,EliotKA,KnehansAW,BembenDA:effectsofsupplementationwithcreatineandproteinonmusclestrengthfollowingatraditionalresistancetrainingprograminmiddle-agedandoldermen.JNutrHealthAging17.TiptonKD,WolfeRR:Proteinandaminoacidsforathletes.JSportsSci18.TiptonKD,ElliottTA,CreeMG,AarslandAA,SanfordAP,WolfeRR:Stimulationofnetmuscleproteinsynthesisbywheyproteiningestionbeforeandafterexercise.AmJPhysiolEndocrinolMetab19.CandowDG,ChilibeckPD:Timingofcreatineorproteinsupplementationandresistancetrainingintheelderly.ApplPhysiolNutrMetab20.AragonAA,SchoenfeldBJ:Nutrienttimingrevisited:isthereapost-exerciseanabolicwindow?JIntSocSportsNutr21.StarkM,LukaszukJ,PrawitzA,SalacinskiA:ProteintiminganditseffectsonmuscularhypertrophyandstrengthinindividualsengagedinJIntSocSportsNutr22.KerksickC,HarveyT,StoutJ,CampbellB,WilbornC,KreiderR,KalmanD,ZiegenfussT,LopezH,LandisJ,etalInternationalSocietyofSportsNutritionpositionstand:nutrienttiming.JIntSocSportsNutr23.WilsonJ,WilsonGJ:Contemporaryissuesinproteinrequirementsandconsumptionforresistancetrainedathletes.JIntSocSportsNutr24.WhiteJP,WilsonJM,AustinKG,GreerBK,StJohnN,PantonLB:Effectofcarbohydrateproteinsupplementtimingonacuteexercise-inducedmuscledamage.JIntSocSportsNutr25.CribbPJ,HayesA:Effectsofsupplementtimingandresistanceexerciseonskeletalmusclehypertrophy.MedSciSportsExerc26.LevenhagenDK,GreshamJD,CarlsonMG,MaronDJ,BorelMJ,FlakollPJ:Postexercisenutrientintaketiminginhumansiscriticaltorecoveryoflegglucoseandproteinhomeostasis.AmJPhysiolEndocrinolMetab27.TiptonKD,FerrandoAA,PhillipsSM,DoyleDJr,WolfeRR:PostexercisenetproteinsynthesisinhumanmusclefromorallyadministeredaminoAmJPhysiol28.TiptonKD,FerrandoAA:Improvingmusclemass:responseofmusclemetabolismtoexercise,nutritionandanabolicagents.EssaysBiochem29.TiptonKD,RasmussenBB,MillerSL,WolfSE,Owens-StovallSK,PetriniBE,WolfeRR:Timingofaminoacid-carbohydrateingestionaltersanabolicresponseofmuscletoresistanceexercise.AmJPhysiolEndocrinolMetab30.HopkinsWG,MarshallSW,BatterhamAM,HaninJ:Progressivestatisticsforstudiesinsportsmedicineandexercisescience.MedSciSportsExerc31.BatterhamAM,HopkinsWG:MakingmeaningfulinferencesaboutIntJSportsPhysiolPerform32.ChruschMJ,ChilibeckPD,ChadKE,DavisonKS,BurkeDG:supplementationcombinedwithresistancetraininginoldermen.SciSportsExerc33.PercarioS,DominguesSP,TeixeiraLF,VieiraJL,deVasconcelosF,CiarrocchiDM,AlmeidaED,ConteM:Effectsofcreatinesupplementationonoxidativestressprofileofathletes.JIntSocSportsNutr34.JagimAR,OliverJM,SanchezA,GalvanE,FluckeyJ,RiechmanS,GreenwoodM,KellyK,MeiningerC,RasmussenC,KreiderRB:Abufferedformofcreatinedoesnotpromotegreaterchangesinmusclecreatinecontent,bodycomposition,ortrainingadaptationsthancreatineJIntSocSportsNutr35.Souza-JuniorTP,WillardsonJM,BloomerR,LeiteRD,FleckSJ,OliveiraPR,SimaoR:Strengthandhypertrophyresponsestoconstantanddecreasingrestintervalsintrainedmenusingcreatinesupplementation.JIntSocSportsNutr36.WilloughbyDS,RoseneJ:Effectsoforalcreatineandresistancetrainingonmyosinheavychainexpression.MedSciSportsExerc37.OlsenS,AagaardP,KadiF,TufekovicG,VerneyJ,OlesenJL,SuettaC,KjaerCreatinesupplementationaugmentstheincreaseinsatellitecellandmyonucleinumberinhumanskeletalmuscleinducedbystrengthJPhysiol38.LemonPW,BerardiJM,NoreenEE:Theroleofproteinandaminoacidsupplementsintheathletesdiet:doestypeortimingofingestionCurrSportsMedRepAntonioandCicconeJournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition:36Page7of8http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36 39.RasmussenBB,TiptonKD,MillerSL,WolfSE,WolfeRR: Anoralessential aminoacidcarbohydratesupplementenhancesmuscleprotein anabolismafterresistanceexercise. JApplPhysiol 2000, 88: 386 – 392. 40.VerdijkLB,JonkersRA,GleesonBG,BeelenM,MeijerK,SavelbergHH, WodzigWK,DendaleP,vanLoonLJ: Proteinsupplementationbeforeand afterexercisedoesnotfurtheraugmentskeletalmusclehypertrophy afterresistancetraininginelderlymen. AmJClinNutr 2009, 89: 608 – 616. 41.HoffmanJR,RatamessNA,TranchinaCP,RashtiSL,KangJ,FaigenbaumAD: Effectofprotein-supplementtimingonstrength,power,andbody- compositionchangesinresistancetrainedmen. IntJSportNutrExerc Metab 2009, 19: 172 – 185. 42.EsmarckB,AndersenJL,OlsenS,RichterEA,MizunoM,KjaerM: Timingof postexerciseproteinintakeisimportantformusclehypertrophywith resistancetraininginelderlyhumans. JPhysiol 2001, 535: 301 – 311. doi:10.1186/1550-2783-10-36 Citethisarticleas: AntonioandCiccone: Theeffectsofpreversuspost workoutsupplementationofcreatinemonohydrateonbody compositionandstrength. JournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSports Nutrition 2013 10 :36. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: € Convenient online submission € Thorough peer review € No space constraints or color “gure charges € Immediate publication on acceptance € Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar € Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit AntonioandCiccone JournaloftheInternationalSocietyofSportsNutrition 2013, 10 :36Page8of8 http://www.jissn.com/content/10/1/36