/
“ We  would expect  appropriate members “ We  would expect  appropriate members

“ We would expect appropriate members - PowerPoint Presentation

jane-oiler
jane-oiler . @jane-oiler
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2018-09-22

“ We would expect appropriate members - PPT Presentation

of staff to have an understanding of the factors that make people support terrorist ideologies or engage in terroristrelated activity Imran Awan Deputy Director Centre for Applied Criminology ID: 674803

prevent strategy people action strategy prevent action people risk communities extremism terrorism behaviour factors violent engage staff drawn values

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "“ We would expect appropriate member..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

We

would expect

appropriate members

of

staff

to have an understanding of the

factors

that make people support

terrorist ideologies

or

engage in terrorist-related activity

.

” Slide2
Slide3

Imran Awan

Deputy Director (Centre for Applied Criminology)

Books:

Extremism, Counter-Terrorism and Policing

(

Ashgate

2013)

Policing

Cyber Threats and Cyber

Terrorism

(

Ashgate

2012)Slide4

‘Prevent’: Implications for Humanities and Social ScienceSlide5

“Prevent

has become a toxic brand and most Muslims are suspicious of what Prevent is doing

.”Slide6

The Prevent

Strategy

To tackle

the ideological causes and challenges of

terrorism.

To

prevent people from being drawn into terrorist-related

activities.

To promote

partnerships between institutions working together to tackle the causes of extremism.Slide7

The Prevent

Strategy

Extremism’

V

ocal

or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs. We also include in our definition of extremism calls for the death of members of our armed forces, whether in this country or overseas. Slide8

The Evidence

Shared values and opposing violent extremism.

Problem – not community led.

Lacking consultation.

Constructing a

‘suspect

community.’Slide9

The Evidence

Counter Terrorism and Security Act

2015.

‘Battle of ideas’.

What are British values?

Statutory legal duty on the public sector.

Universities and the wider public education sector.

PROBLEMS –

TRUSTSlide10

The Strategy

“Changes in behaviour and outlook may be visible to university staff.”  Slide11

The Strategy

“Must have the necessary staff training, IT policies and student welfare programmes to recognise these signs and respond appropriately”.Slide12

The Strategy

“Due

regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism”.Slide13

The Strategy

“Staff

should have sufficient training to be able to recognise vulnerability to being drawn into terrorism, and be aware of what action to take to take in response.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/445916/Prevent_Duty_Guidance_For_Higher_Education__England__Wales_.pdf

Slide14

The Strategy

Universities

will be expected

to:

C

arry

out a risk

assessment.

A

ssesses

where and how their students might be at risk of being drawn into terrorism.

No just

violent extremism but also non-violent

extremism

.Slide15

The Strategy

Institution’s

that

identify

a risk should develop a Prevent action

plan.

A

ctions that will mitigate this risk.

Willing to undertake Prevent awareness training.

Training to help prevent people from being drawn into terrorism.Slide16

The Strategy: In Action

Safeguarding Approach.

‘Troubling Behaviour.’

Awareness of vulnerabilities.

Normal behaviour vs Troubling behaviour.

Lonely.

Isolated.

Change of viewpoints.Slide17

The Strategy: In Action

You have contact with students.

Behaviour change.

Attendance drops.

Speak to the student – WHY?

Could be a bereavement.

Not about looking for behaviour. Slide18

The Strategy: In ActionSlide19

The Strategy: In Action

Some people possess different types of behaviour.

Andrew Ibrahim.

Personality change.

Leaflets.

Nothing necessarily WRONG.

Language used.

Spoke to tutors and no one picked this up.Slide20

The Strategy: In Action

NOTICE

CHECK

SHARESlide21

The Strategy: In Action

NOTICE – (Issue/Something is WRONG).

CHECK – (Personal Tutor is concerned/Fb comment).

SHARE – (Refer to safeguarding officer).Slide22

The Strategy: In Action

Channel Panel (LA/Police/Prison service

etc

).

Individual follows this.

MUST give CONSENT.Slide23

The Strategy: In Action

Key Questions:

How small is the risk?

Are staff trained?

DUE DILIGENCE.

Resources, Needs and Support.Slide24

CASESSlide25

The Strategy: In Action

Parents splitting up.

Makes them vulnerable and angry.

Family breakdown.

External Factors.

TV.

Gaming.

Social Media.Slide26

Rethinking Radicalisation

PUSH FACTORS

Anger.

Frustration.

Perceived injustice.

Exclusion.

Dissatisfaction.Slide27

Rethinking Radicalisation

PULL FACTORS

Identity.

Belonging.

Recruitment agents.

Unity.

Brotherhood.Slide28

EXAMPLE

RISK

POSTING EXTREMIST MATERIAL ONLINE

Supporting comments

University internal policy on social media

Moderation.

Workshops

Rating – RISK LEVEL 1-5.Slide29

External Speakers

Free Speech debate.

Within the Law.

Should they be challenged.

What topics will they cover.

What has been put in place.

What are they speaking about?

A full transcript as evidence. Slide30

PROBLEMSSlide31

External Speakers

Because

after researching both her [

Namazie

] and her organisation, a number of flags have been

raised.

We have a duty of care to conduct a risk assessment

for

each speaker who wishes to come to

campus. Slide32

PROBLEMSSlide33

Rethinking Radicalisation

No single pathway.

Non-linear process.

Behavioural

and environmental

factors.

S

ocio-economic

and cultural factors do play a

role

.Slide34

In Practice

The s

trategy

is limited to providing communities with measures to help ‘work together to challenge

extremism’.

BUT does

not expand on the methods required to help

communities

do so. 

http://

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02r8z20Slide35

Can Ministers define extremism?Slide36

PREVENT

It is realistic to accept that some problems have arisen, notably from the feeling of some parts of the community that they have been victims of state ‘snooping’. Also, there has been some controversy about the extent to which the public sector should engage with possible

extremists

.Slide37

Children

“If a child draws a picture of bombs on there notebooks, that’s potentially a cause for concern.”

290 children reported in this manner.

Identify and go through Channel.

CASE – Child presentation.

Jamil Scott.

State surveillance becomes abstract.Slide38

Reengaging Communities

Young people must be empowered to engage politically in society.

Safe spaces – online and offline.

Speak openly about there identity and belonging.

The impact of racism, victimisation and Islamophobia.

Policing and Prevent.

Reinforcing messages through the Fire Service.

Rule of Law, Democracy and Liberty.Slide39

The Way Forward

Create an open and safe virtual environment.

Positive

connotations and role models required.

Equipping young people with skills.

Empowering local communities.

Promoting free speech and creating a safe space for dialogue.

Develop interventions that seek to change behaviour.Slide40

Reengaging Communities

This is a

PROBLEM

for all COMMUNITIES.

Includes far-right violence.

Public sector workers are NOT counter-terrorism officers.

PREVENT should be independent.

The interpretation of Islam should be a matter for MUSLIMS.Slide41

Reengaging Communities

Young people must be empowered to engage politically in society.

Safe spaces – online and offline.

Speak openly about there identity and belonging.

The impact of racism, victimisation and Islamophobia.

Policing and Prevent.

Reinforcing messages through the Fire Service.

Rule of Law, Democracy and Liberty.Slide42

PROMOTE

Have a

shared language.

A

deep-rooted sense of our history; both the good and bad chapters.

Support and

create the spaces, places and opportunities for people to come

together.

British

values are inclusive, not

exclusive.

W

e

live by the British values we define. Slide43

Building Resilience

Challenge

extremist

beliefs

.

D

isrupt

those who promote violent

extremism.

S

upport

individuals who are vulnerable to recruitment by violent

extremists.

I

ncrease

resilience of communities to engage with and resist violent

extremists.

E

ffectively

deal with

grievances.