PPT-Deductive Techniques for synthesis

from Inductive Specifications Dagstuhl Seminar Oct 2015 Sumit Gulwani Vu Le Collaborators Dan Barowy Ted Hart Alex Polozov Dileep Kini Rishabh Singh Mikael Mayer Gustavo Soares Ben Zorn. Arguments. Premise: . statement upon which an argument is based or from which a conclusion is drawn. Premise is either true or false. Arguments: . Consist of one or more premises and one conclusion or claim, which is drawn from those premises. TOK. Lecture 7: Ways of Knowing - Reason. Part 1: What is reasoning? And, how does it lead to knowledge?. What is reasoning?. A possible answer: reasoning is the mental processing of information.. But, not all mental processing. Section 2.3. : . Using . deductive reasoning to verify conjectures. Chapter 2: Geometric Reasoning. I Can. Determine whether inductive of deductive reasoning is being used for a given scenario.. Apply the Law of Detachment in logical reasoning and determine if it is being used validly.. FOCUS UP!!. BUCKLE DOWN!!. TRY NOT TO BE ABSENT!!. WORK HARD!. GET REST!. This is a marathon…. not a sprint…. You after EOC. Our Plan of Attack. Mini lessons. Item sampler practice test and review. Sub; legal method and legal reasoning. NITIN RANA. PARIKSHIT GAUR. PURNENDU . PuLKITPAL. . SINGH. RISHAB RAJ. RITIKA GAUTAM. Group MEMBERS ARE -. Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as top-down logic. Its counterpart, inductive reasoning, is sometimes referred to as bottom-up logic. Where deductive reasoning proceeds from general premises to a specific conclusion, inductive reasoning proceeds from specific premises to a general conclusion. . A deductive argument is one whose . premises. are claimed to . provide conclusive grounds for the truth . of its . conclusion. .. If a deductive argument is . valid. , it is . impossible for its premises to be true without its conclusion also being true.. Lecture Outline. Inductive Reasoning. Generalizations. Cause and Effect. Analogy. Deductive Reasoning. Syllogism. Enthymeme. Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning: Review. The process of citing a number of specific examples or . Culminating Activity . The Social Science Research Project. The Age of Enlightenment (16th to . 18th Centuries) saw the emergence . of a new way or thinking and . approaching the world and its . workings. The Scientific Revolution, . Thinking Mathematically. Objectives. Understand mathematical reasoning . Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning . Identify . arithmetic and geometric sequences . Thinking Mathematically. Mimi . Opkins. CECS 100. Fall 2011. Problem Solving. Logic. – The science of correct reasoning.. Reasoning. – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from known or assumed facts.. When solving a problem, one must understand the question, gather all pertinent facts, analyze the problem i.e. compare with previous problems (note similarities and differences), perhaps use pictures or formulas to solve the problem.. Note-Taking Guide. I suggest only writing down things written in . red. Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning. What was our definition of inductive reasoning (section 2.1)?. Process of looking for patterns, making a conjecture, and then attempting to prove the conjecture true or false. Discuss with your group.. Be prepared to share your answers. . The Hardest Part. The synthesis section is the hardest part of the exam. It is worth . 47. % . of the entire exam!. 17 % -- multiple choice. . Parts 1-4 – Data Extraction, Quality Assessment, Synthesising Across Studies, . Completing the Analysis. Workshop: . Framework Synthesis, Meta-Ethnography and Realist Synthesis . Shared Topic: . Strategies for organizationClimactic orderarranges the most important/persuasive evidence last since this is what is remembered Problem/solutionestablishes the problem in the introduction then offers