/
Case Number119 Case Number119

Case Number119 - PDF document

layla
layla . @layla
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2021-10-10

Case Number119 - PPT Presentation

x0000x0000Page of ZONING MAP CHANGESTAFF REPORTCity CouncilMeeting Date Council District September 11 2018Case Manager Lynn JordanSurplus Yes No Council Initi ID: 899386

147 148 zoning industrial 148 147 industrial zoning x0000 light area plan stated applicant commercial land case notification development

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Case Number119" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 ��Page of Case Number119
��Page of Case Number119 ZONING MAP CHANGESTAFF REPORTCity CouncilMeeting Date: Council District September 11, 2018 Case Manager Lynn Jordan Surplus Yes No Council Initiated Yes ___ No _ Owner/ ApplicantBalog Properties LLCSite Location Request:From:OneFamily To:LightIndustrial Land Use Compatibility:Requested change Zoning Commission Recommendation: Approval by a vote of 8Opposition:None submitted Support: None submitte d ��Page of TheCity ofFort Worth recently published an Economic Development Strategic Planwhich stated four specific outcomes, one of which isA more sustainable tax base, driven less by residential property valuation and more by commercial and industrial investment”Light Industrial typically provides office/warehouse uses and is limited to a height of 45 feetat the current time.Below is chart of theregulations of the “

2 I” Light Industrial zoning district
I” Light Industrial zoning district. “I” Light Industrial Maximum eight3 stories or 45 feet Front Yard Setbackrequired if entire block frontage is zoned “FR” through “K” Interior Side Yard Setback5 feet minimum adjacent to residentially zoned lot, none otherwise. If provided, side yard must be 3 feet minimum Corner Side Yard Setback required unless through lot, then 10 feet minimum required Rear Yard Setback10 feet minimum adjacent to residentially zoned lot, none otherwise Summary of Allowed Uses All uses permitted in “G”, plusfood processing, animal hospitals and outdoor kennels, transportation terminals, batch plant, warehousing, outside sales & storage, printing and light manufacturing Site Information:OwnerBalog Properties LLC8605 Amen CornerFlower Mound, TX 75022Agent:Paula Reagan/SLR UnlimitedAcreage: 10.04Comprehensive Plan SectorFar NorthSurroundingZoning and Land Uses:Nort

3 h43” OneFamilysinglefamily, commerc
h43” OneFamilysinglefamily, commercial EastUnzonedsinglefamilySouthOneFamily; Unzonedsingle familywith horse stablesWest“J” Medium Industrialsinglefamily and outdoor storage Recent Relevant Zoning and Platting History: Zoning HistoryZC116 Councilinitiated rezoning to “A43”, “AOneFamilyand “I” Light Industrialeffective11, subject area; ZC030 Annexation enclave 3Unzoned to “I” Light Industrial effective 317, subject area just to the east Platting History Transportation/Access Street/Thoroughfare Existing Proposed Day Road Two - Way County Rd Two - Way County Rd IH - 35W Freeway Fr eeway Public Notification:300 foot Legal Notifications were mailed on July, 2018. ��Page of The following organizations were notified: (emailed July, 2018 Organizations Notified Fort Worth League of Neighborhoods Streams and Valleys Inc. Trinity Habitat for Humanity North

4 Fort Worth Alliance The Ranches NA *
Fort Worth Alliance The Ranches NA * Northwest ISD Closest registered Neighborhood AssociationDevelopmentImpact Analysis Land Use Compatibility The applicant is requesting to rezonefrom” OneFamilyo “I” LightIndustrial for industrial uses, no intended user at this timeSurrounding land uses are mostly singlefamily or vacant with some commercial and light industrial uses east ofthe Alliance industrial growth center.Due to the required buffers between industrial and residential uses and east ofthe AllianceIndustrial Growth Centerhe proposed rezoning is compatible at this location.As a result, tproposed LightIndustrialzoningis compatible at this location ComprehensivePlan Consistency The 20Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Light IndustrialThe proposedIndustrial zoning district,is consistentwith the following Comprehensive Plan policiesLocate large industrial uses along freight lines, highways, or a

5 irports withinindustrial growth centers
irports withinindustrial growth centers and other appropriate locations.Based on conformance with the future land use map and policies stated above, the proposed zoning consistentwith the Comprehensive PlanThe city’s newEconomic Development Strategic Plan ourages expansion of the commercial and industrial base. The proposed rezoning would support this goal. The below policies from the Strategic Plan apply to the proposed rezoning, with proper buffering and separation from the residential district. INITIATIVE 1.3. BUSINESS RETENTION & EXPANSION (BRE)1.3.3.2. Ensure protection for other significant industrial districts with concentrations of manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing businesses that generate heavy truck traffic.1.3.3.3. Work with the real estate community to preserve strategically located sites within emerging employment/business districts to allow and encourage future development of highvalue, high density em

6 ployment nodes.Attachments:Location MapA
ployment nodes.Attachments:Location MapArea Zoning Mapwith 0 ft. Notification AreaFuture Land Use MapAerialPhotographMinutes from the Zoning Commission meeting ��Draft ZC minutesAugustMultifamily To: PD/D Planned Development for all uses in “D” High Density Multifamily with Development Standards plus cottage community; site plan required with waivers to URD submission and certain standards for cottage community only; site plan includedDixon Holman, 1241 W. Green Oaks, Arlington, TXrepresenting the applicant gave a presentationover the project, showcasing similar projects in the DFW area. He went over the type of housing market rate, single family detached units, all with backyards. They lease the Document received for written correspondence ZC - 18 - 114 Address In/Out 300 ft. notification area Position on case Summary Dixon Holman 1241 W. Green Oaks, Arlington, TX Representing applicant M

7 arcella Olson500 W. 7th StSupportReprese
arcella Olson500 W. 7th StSupportRepresenting owner ZC - 18 - 1 15 Name Address In/Out 300 ft. notification area Position on case Yvette J. Kent 5424 Wellesley Ave Support Representing applicant ��Draft ZC minutesAugustPaula Regan, 4001 Burwood Dr, stated they would like to rezone the property from “A43” to “I” in an area that is predominantly zoned light industrial.Motion: Following brief discussion, Aughinbaughrecommended Approval of the requestseconded by MTrevino. The motion passed unanimouslywith Mr. McDonnell absentMadelon, I(CD 3)2120 Ridgmar BoulevardPortion of Lot 1 Block 1 of Madelon Addition, 0.67 acres) From: “E” Neighborhood Commercial and “FR” General Commercial Restricted with “AO”NASJRB Airport Overlay To: “PD/E” PD Planned Development for all uses in “E” Neighborhood Commercial plus bar/lounge with no outside activ

8 ity where adjacent to single family zoni
ity where adjacent to single family zoning/“AO” NASJRB Overlay; site plan waiver requestedJohn Maddux, 6363 Newport Ct, representing the applicant stated that the current bar, A Great Notion, has been operating in this location for approximately 40 years and does not meet the food requirement for a restaurant. They would like to clean up the zoning to allow the use by right. He explained that the new patio created an issue with residents behind them.He also stated they have support from the Ridgmar Neighborhood Association.Richard Shaheen, 6405 Dakar Rd W,spoke in opposition. He lives adjacent to the bar, which he said has been there longthan he has. He does not thinkbars area compatible use next to a residential neighborhood. He statedconcerns with hours, noise, safety, and code compliance. He asked the commission to consider other options, such as limiting the expansion of the bar, including the height, rooftop porc

9 hor an outdoor patioDuring the rebuttalM
hor an outdoor patioDuring the rebuttalMr. Maddux stated the current owner met with all the neighborsand got the impression that no one would oppose it. He stated he checked with police and there havebeen no fight in the last five years, and the shopping center which the bar is in fronts on Ridgmar Boulevard.He said that the PD would not allow any patio in the rear.Motion: Following brief discussion, Aughinbaughrecommended Approval of the requestas amended to prohibittheexpansion of any baruseseconded by MConlin. The motion passed unanimously 8 Document received for written correspondence ZC - 18 - 119 Name Address In/Out 300 ft. notification area Position on case Summary Paula Regan 4001 Burwood Dr Support Representing applicant Document received for written correspondence ZC - 18 - 120 Name Address In/Out 300 ft. notification area Position on case Summary John Maddux6363 Newport CtSupport Representing app