PPT-Rigor and reproducibility:

back to basics October 26 2017 Patricia Valdez p h d Nih Extramural Research Integrity Officer overview Why the concern about reproducibility The NIH response Updates to grant applications. Thomas Steckler. FORCE2015, Oxford, 12-13 Jan 2015. 2. The Pillars of Good Scientific Practice. Reproducibility. Robustness. Relevance. SCIENCE. 3. Should Scholarly Research Aim . for . Reproducibility or Robustness?. Back to Basics. Judy Hewitt, Ph.D.. On Detail to OER. October 17, 2015. NIH Regional Seminar. Learning Objectives. Describe . the issue of reproducibility and NIH plans to address it. Summarize . changes to application instructions and review criteria for NIH grants. PhD. On Detail to Office of . Extramural . Research. National Institutes of Health. May 18, 2015. Center for Scientific Review. Advisory Council Meeting. Enhancing Reproducibility . Through Rigor & Transparency. Koi, Tatsumi. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. 1. Overview. There is a reproducibility problem in . G4ionIonisation. P. hysics tables are affected by pre-history. 2. Test bed. Shoot particles into a target. Corn and Tomato. 2015 . National Referee. AOSA/SCST . 2016 Annual Meeting. Melissa Phillips. Monsanto . Seed Technology Center. Waterman, Illinois. Purpose. The purpose of the referee was to introduce Agar (plant culturing media) as a potential candidate for use in germination testing.. What are the components of core instruction? . From Student Achievement Partners and Achieve the Core. Rigor. “Rigor for the 21. st. century includes a focus on skills for life: critical thinking and problem solving, collaboration and leadership, agility and adaptability, initiative and entrepreneurialism, effective oral and written communication, accessing and analyzing information, and curiosity and imagination.” (Wagner, 2008). November 2016. Guidelines for Today’s Learning. Be open to and respect all points of view.. Listen with an open mind and expect to learn from one another.. Accept responsibility for active and equitable participation by each group member.. Marco . Canini (KAUST) and Jon Crowcroft (. University of Cambridge). What it takes to do reproducible research?. It is actually hard work for both authors and reproducers. Produce solid artifacts. Create, package, share reproducible experiments. september. 22, . 2017. Patricia Valdez, . p. h. d. Nih. extramural research integrity officer. 2. Nature. , 25 May 2016. The Reproducibility Challenge. Noted by research community; in multiple publications. Corn Germination. 2016. Melissa Phillips. Monsanto. Seed Technology Center. Waterman, Illinois USA. Purpose. The purpose of the referee was to introduce Agar (plant culturing media) as a potential candidate for use in germination testing for corn.. back to basics. May 4, 2017. Patricia Valdez, . p. h.. d.. Nih. Extramural Research Integrity Officer. overview. Why the concern about reproducibility?. The NIH response. Updates to grant applications. Michael D. Ernst. University of Washington. Presented at ICST. 20 April 2012. Reproducibility:. The linchpin of verification. A test should behave . deterministically. For detecting failures. For debugging. Marco . Canini (KAUST) and Jon Crowcroft (. University of Cambridge). What it takes to do reproducible research?. It is actually hard work for both authors and reproducers. Produce solid artifacts. Create, package, share reproducible experiments. Matthias Flittner. 1. , Robert Bauer. 1. ,. Amr . Rizk. 2. , . Stefan . Geißler. 3. , . Thomas . Zinner. 3. , . Martina . Zitterbart. 1. 1. Karlsruhe Institute . of. Technology, . 2. Technische . Universität Darmstadt, .