PPT-Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation

AARPE Session 1 Day One Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Technical Assistance Initially Offered 201415 Overview and Purpose To improve instruction and instructional leadership practices by strengthening the alignment between the Performance Standards for Teachers and Principals and the Lesson Planning Lesson Observation Professional Development and Leadership Academic Review Tools . Implementing Standard 7. 0. August 2012. Standard 7: . Student Academic Progress. Code of Virginia. School boards shall develop a procedure for use by division superintendents and principals in evaluating instructional personnel that is appropriate to the tasks performed and addresses, among other things, . 2015. Civil Service & . Academic Professional Positions. WELCOME. . . These quotes were reportedly taken from actual federal employee performance evaluations:. “Since my last report, this employee has reached rock bottom and has started to dig.”. Can understanding our differences . help us meet common goals?. Will . Masters. Professor, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University. www.nutrition.tufts.edu | sites.tufts.edu/. Aligning Your Site and . District Plans . Winter 2015. Art . Davis. Regional . System of District . and . School Support, Region. VII. . Federal and State Accountability . Elements . of the Single Plan . Eric Barela, Ph.D.. Chief Organizational Performance Officer. Partners in School Innovation. 2010 American Evaluation Association Conference, . San Antonio, TX. Presentation roadmap. Organizational context. FY 2018. Staff Compensation Program. (SCP) is a URA- only salary program. . Yearly Performance evaluation – should be done every year. Merit pool for salary increases . –. All $$ must be split among URA. All $$ must be spent. . for. Professional & professional Faculty. Informational Session. COLLEGE OF . WILLIAM & MARY/VIMS. Training Objectives. The Purpose of Performance Management. Performance Management Cycle . Roles & Responsibilities. OnLine. Training. 12/16/2013. Depth of Knowledge (DOK). No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires assessments to “measure the depth and breadth of the state academic content standards for a given grade level”. USDE, 2003. WORKLOAD. J. . Sanchez. 1,2. , . A. Badillo-. Milian. 3. , . H. . Chagolla. 3. , . A. . Mora. 1,. 3. , J. . Nieto-. Miranda. 4. 1. Tecnológico Nacional de México. (MEXICO). 2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (MEXICO). Evaluation Process. Jul-09. 2. Purpose. The primary purpose . of a . performance management . system. . is to communicate performance standards to . employees. , to provide . coaching, feedback . & observations . Social Media, Academic Writing, and Constructing a Review Quickwrite #4: Can Social Media help us with Academic Writing? On p. 537, the authors of Everyone’s an Author assert (claim to be true) that Today’s Agenda. Overview – Performance Management at Northeastern. Feedback Framework . Introduction of Performance Ratings/ Activity. Self Assessment. Merit Increases – Correlating Pay to Performance. Grades K-5. 1. 2. We know from experience the hard work teachers face every day as they strive to help their students meet the challenges set by higher standards.. We are a team of current and former classroom teachers, curriculum writers, school leaders and education experts who have worked in the public, private and nonprofit sectors.. A Free Resource Benefiting. Canadian Municipalities. Agenda. Who are we?. Performance Evaluations. Survey Results. Developing a process.. What’s in the toolkit?. Where can I get it?. Who Are We?. Performance Evaluations.