PPT-Group Dynamics and Group Decision Making

COMMISSIONER JOHN D MILLER 12140 Woodcrest Executive Drive Suite 325 St Louis MO 63141 314 2052005 What to Look for In Groups Participation Who are the High and Low Participators Watch for Shifts in Participation. “It doesn’t matter which side of the fence you get off . on . sometimes. . What . matters most is getting off. You cannot make progress without making decisions. .”. Jim . Rohn. . “Nothing is more difficult, and therefore more precious, than to be able to decide.”. Creativity, and Entrepreneurship. chapter seven. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.. Learning Objectives. Understand the nature of managerial decision making, differentiate . A . Student Perspective. Dr Ahmad . Nazari. London Metropolitan University. Ms Kim . Willis. University of Sunderland. Introduction. Context of the study: 20 international PG students on a one-year MA TESOL programme, one of the north-east universities, UK.. Karl A. Smith. Engineering Education – Purdue University. Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM . Education Center/ Civil . Engineering . - University of Minnesota. ksmith@umn.edu - http. ://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith. A General Model of Group Dynamics. Phase One. Type of Group. Group Formation. Phase Two. Group Development stages. Mutual Acceptance. Communication and Decision Making. Motivation and Productivity. Control and Organization. Reflection. School Leadership Team Myths. Review of Basic Material. Steering . the Elephant. Decision Making. Consensus-Based Decision Making. Support for SLTs. 3. Don't underestimate the power of your vision to change the world. Whether that world is your office, your community, an industry or a global movement, you need to have a core belief that what you contribute can fundamentally change the paradigm or way of thinking about problems. Karl A. Smith. Engineering Education – Purdue University. Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM . Education Center/ Civil . Engineering . - University of Minnesota. ksmith@umn.edu - http. ://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith. Entrepreneurship*. *(related to Glass Ceiling. ). Chapter Five. Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Learning Objectives. LO1. Understand . the nature of . KEY RULES & DECISION MAKING . Trilateral: . Monica Lagazio, Timothy Mitchener-Nissen. Trilateral Research. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Learning Outcomes. Identify the steps in the decision-making process. Describe various models of decision making. Discuss the individual influences that affect decision making. Explain how groups make decisions. WSLD 2012. What is CBDM?. CBDM stands for Consensus-Based-Decision-Making. Consensus . may be defined . as . an acceptable resolution, one that can be supported, even if not the "favorite" of each individual. . Strategy . Sage web . site. Six . sets of PowerPoint slides:. Introduction to Making Strategy. Strategy as the Prioritisation and Management of Key Issues. Strategy as Purpose: Agreeing Goals and Aspirations for the Organisation. Chapter 4. 2. Managerial Decision Making. Decision making is not easy. It must be done amid . ever-changing factors . unclear information . conflicting points of view. 3. Definition : Decision . Making. PLANNING: . Steps, Importance, Components. CO ORDINATION: . Importance. MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES: . Advantages, MBE. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: . Concept, Components. DECISION MAKING: . Techniques, Essentials, Impact Of Technology On Decision Making. .