PPT-Companies Act, 2013

Impact on MampA December 18 2015 Lalit Kumar Partner J Sagar Associates advocates amp solicitors Ahmedabad Bengaluru Chennai Gurgaon Hyderabad Mumbai New Delhi. Controller Memory ACT Activation BRIO Burst IO BKG Background brPage 3br 0 25 50 75 100 Base SMS VWQ Ideal Base SMS VWQ Ideal Base SMS VWQ Ideal Base SMS VWQ Ideal Base SMS VWQ Ideal Base SMS VWQ Ideal Data Serving Media Streaming Online Analytics Business in . India: The . New Companies . Act 2013. Sannam S4 Webinar Series 2014. June 17, 2014. www.sannams4.com. @Sannam_S4. . Sannam S4. The story so far…. Why Companies Act 2013 Could See More . Challenges and Opportunities for Chartered Accountants. PART - 2. WIRC - AHMEDABAD - 26.10.2013. 1. . WORKSHOP ON COMPANIES ACT, 2013. WIRC - AHMEDABAD - 26.10.2013. 2. . PENALTIES / PUNISHMENT FOR DEFAULTS . Industry’s perspective on M&A Provisions. 22 February . 2014. Equity . shares with DVRs - Commonly used instrument for PE/ VC . funding. Used . for various commercial reasons – typically to separate economic interest and voting rights. Copyright 2013 Lakshmikumaran . &Sridharan . 2. © COPYRIGHT . 2013 . LAKSHMI KUMARAN & SRIDHARAN . 2. Definitions: 94. “. Associate company. ”: . non subsidiary but has significant influence deemed to be control of over 20% or business decisions through an agreement . By CS . Mamta. . Binani. Past Chairperson (Year 2010), EIRC of ICSI. Practising. Company Secretary. At ACAE. For Chartered Accountants. mamtab@mamtabinani.com. dated : 16.11.2013. SECRETARIAL AUDIT. Copyright 2013 Lakshmikumaran . &Sridharan . 2. © COPYRIGHT . 2013 . LAKSHMI KUMARAN & SRIDHARAN . 2. Definitions: 94. “. Associate company. ”: . non subsidiary but has significant influence deemed to be control of over 20% or business decisions through an agreement . (A Brief Overview). by . A. K. KUCHHAL. Managing Partner. IndiaCorp. Law. Corporate Consultants and Advocates. In Association with M/s A. K. . Kuchhal. & Co.. Company Secretaries. 1. Foreign Companies. Failure . of. . SICA. SICA . lacked in . many . aspects. . –. ▫ . SICA . was . made applicable only . to . industrial. . undertakings. ▫ . Section 22 . of the . SICA . which . dealt with moratorium . Partner. UKCA and Partners. Email: pankaj.jain@ukca.in. Mobile: 844 777 8422. ADJUDICATION AUTHORITIES AND PENAL PROVISIONS. PAST PITFALLS AND LESSONS LEARNT. The Act substantially redresses past pitfalls and lays checks and balances through disclosures and enhanced corporate governance mechanisms . The Companies Act, 2013 CS PANKAJ JAIN Partner UKCA and Partners Email: pankaj.jain@ukca.in Mobile: 844 777 8422 ADJUDICATION AUTHORITIES AND PENAL PROVISIONS PAST PITFALLS AND LESSONS LEARNT The Act substantially redresses past pitfalls and lays checks and balances through disclosures and enhanced corporate governance mechanisms : An overview of key changes. | 21. st. April 2018. 1. 2. Background. . Significant legal reforms in recent times is the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013 (. 2013 Act) which overhauled the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956 (1956 Act). . Need to regulate - Rationale:. To prevent:.  . - . Siphoning off of Public funds lent by FIs and Banks .  . - . Public . issue proceeds.  . - . Misuse . by transferring funds to private businesses owned by the Director. . . . . P C Agrawal . . . B.Com. ., LL.B., CAIIB, FCS. cs.pcagrawal@gmail.com. . 20/2/2014 Download Source- . www.taxguru.in. . Contents. MCA Notification dated 12.9.2013.