in institutional research about inequality in students outcomes Duna Sabri 27 June 2016 d unasabrikclacuk Closing the Gap Research and Practice on Black and Minority Ethnic Student Attainment in HE ID: 812788
Download The PPT/PDF document "The negotiation of ethics and communica..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The negotiation of ethics and communication in institutional research about inequality in students’ outcomes
Duna Sabri27 June 2016duna.sabri@kcl.ac.uk
Closing the Gap: Research and Practice on Black and Minority Ethnic Student Attainment in HE
Slide2OverviewDifferences in attainment: some context
Institutional approaches and their pitfallsCausation: in HE discourse, applied research and theoryImplications of different views of causation
Slide3HE outcomes by ethnicity: difference between actual and sector-adjusted average, 2006-07 cohort
Young, UK-domiciled students starting a full-time first degree course at a UK HEI (HEFCE 2013/15).
Slide4Institutional approaches and their pitfalls
Confirming ...replicating national research, not tailoring analysis to distinctive institutional conditionsExploratory ... Over-investment, kept confidential Awareness-raising and discussion among academics, other professional staff and students
… restricted to committees and senior managers, rolled out on optional basis to those already aware and interested
Intervention
… continuity of staff, investment & clarity about what constitutes evidence (correlation + causal mechanism)
Evaluation
...unwarranted pessimism, lack of expertise and/or resource
Slide5Causation in HE discourse on attainment
Viewed through different lenses coloured by:Fears of reputational damage and freedom of information requestsAssumptions about where the causes lie are expressed in the choice of language: ‘achievement’, ‘under-performance’ or ‘degree classification’?Among activists: student attribute causes labelled ‘deficit model’ or ‘blaming the students’; institutional
attribute causes branded ‘
institutional
racism
’
Slide6Causation in research on attainment
Politicised polarisation between ‘individualised’ explanations (e.g. prior attainment) and structural (e.g campus environment) [Caplan & Ford 2014]‘Were they pushed or did they jump?’ Gambetta [1987] explores tensions between intentional choice, causes beyond individual awareness, and structural constraints on behaviour.Debates about structure and agency are political and have profound consequences for what is believed to be a worthwhile intervention.
Slide7Causality assumptions imbedded in communication
Surely, it’s social class! Language? Prior attainment!It is unthinkable that I would treat black students differently.
Slide8Slide9Why is my curriculum White?Why is my curriculum white?
Slide10What if…causation is
an interplay between what a student brings and what an institution provides, understood through a dialogic process of investigation?
Slide11What would constitute evidence of that interplay?
Correlation demonstrated through:Experimental research designs with control groupsLarge-scale quantitative analysisBUTIn social sciences oft-repeated ‘negative advice’ that a correlation is not the same as causation [Gorard
2002] acts as a general warning to steer away from causal claims.
Mechanisms
[Clarke
et al 2014]
demonstrated through:
Experience
Observation
BUT
‘psychologically compelling accounts’ do not constitute evidence [Clarke et al 2014]
Context of elevation of ‘the student experience (
Sabri
2011)
+
Slide12Subject group for 2003-4 entrants: HEFCE 2010/13
Subject group
White
Black
Pakistani & Bangladeshi
Chinese
Indian & other Asian
Mixed & other
Creative arts
20,160
(12%)
515
(10%)
175
(3%)
225
(10%)
550
(5%)
635
(12%)
Humanities
34,430
(20%)
610
(12%)
665
(11%)135(6%)900(8%)930(18%)Business30,275(18%)1,345(27%)1,340(21%)645(27%)3,115(27%)1,030(20%)Science44,830(26%)1,105(22%)2,225(36%)710(30%)3,655(32%)1,235(24%)Engineering & architecture11,745365410310(13%)865335Other23,83591519%1,3652802,160710Total171,9654,9456,2452,35011,3955,155
By contrast,
Woodfield
(2014) analyses
make up
of disciplines by ethnicity, retention & attainment
Slide13Interplay between familial contexts and HE
Images courtesy of Shades of Noir
How are the different disciplines historically and socially situated in different ethnic groups?
And
conversely, how do the disciplines situate different ethnicities?
Slide14‘Some students just don’t sign up to the intellectual project that is the course.’
Slide15Slide16Interventions
Universal: neutralise advantages conferred by unequal resources. E.g. clarity of briefsIndirectly targeted. E.g. commuter studentsTargeted but of universal benefit. E.g. addressing WhitenessTargeted resources: aimed at redressing past inequality or lack of knowledge. E.g. student ambassador scheme (Source: Runnymede 2015, Aiming Higher)
Slide17Interventions: who is involved?
Leadership from senior managersTutors, relationships and curricula: a primary site of change: ‘we need to define the problem for ourselves’Students: representation, knowledge and burdens of responsibilityStaff with experience and expertise in equality and diversity
Slide18Interventions: basic resourcesRelevant statistical
correlations at appropriate level (subject, programme) over several yearsKnowledge and understanding of causal mechanismsAwareness of possible interventions: help to adapt and adopt
Access to expertise and resources for
evaluation
Slide19ReferencesCaplan, P. J., & Ford, J. C. (2014). The voices of diversity: What students of diverse races/ ethnicities and both sexes tell us about their college experiences and their perceptions about their institutions’ progress toward diversity. APORIA, 6(3), 30–69.
Clarke, B., Gillies, D., Illari, P., Russo, F., & Williamson, J. (2014). Mechanisms and the evidence hierarchy. Topoi, 33(2), 339-360.Gambetta, D. (1987) Were they pushed or did they jump? Individual decision mechanisms in education, Cambridge, CUPGorard,S
.
(2002) The Role of Causal Models
in Evidence-informed
Policy Making and Practice,
Evaluation & Research
in Education
,
16(1), 51-65
Mountford-
Zimdars
, A., D.
Sabri
,
J.
Moore, J. Sanders,
S.
Jones (2015) The Causes of Differential Outcomes for HE Students in England, HEFCE
Sabri
,
D.
(2011) What’s wrong with ‘the student experience’? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32(5
)
Woodfield, R. (2014) Undergraduate retention and attainment across the disciplines, York: HEA