Nonverbal Communication Nonverbal communication is Culture bound However certain universals exist eg smile Effective communication is the combined harmony of verbal and nonverbal actions Florello LaGuardia legendary mayor of NYC 19331945 was fluent in English Italian and Yiddish Res ID: 551393
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Verbal & Nonverbal Communication" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Verbal & Nonverbal Communication Slide2
Nonverbal Communication
Nonverbal communication is Culture bound
However, certain universals exist (e.g. smile)
Effective communication is the combined harmony of verbal and nonverbal actions.Slide3
Florello LaGuardia, legendary mayor of NYC 1933-1945, was fluent in English, Italian, and Yiddish. Researchers who watched videos of his campaigns with sound off were able to understand which language he was speaking by the changes in nonverbal behavior.Slide4
Types of Communication
Vocal Com.
Nonvocal
Com.
Verbal Com.
Spoken words
Written Words
Nonverbal Com.
Tone of voice, sighs, screams, vocal qualities, (loudness) etc
Gestures, movement, appearance, facial expression etc Slide5
Verbal vs NonverbalSlide6
Challenges to Communicating Across Cultures
Communication is a combination of what is said, the way in which it is said and our body language.
Challenges can be categorized as:
speaking accent
topics of conversation
slang/jargonSlide7
Challenges (cont’d)
Formal/informal language
Tone
Gestures/ Posture
Physical space and contact
Communication Style
Dress and appearance
GenderSlide8
The high-context communication style
is associated with a nonverbal, implicit, high-context style of communication, which predominates in non-Western, collectivist countries. It does not focus on just the immediate issues, but puts a particular focus on long-term and emotional aspects of the relationship between the parties and is preoccupied with considerations of symbolism, status, and face; It also draws on highly developed communication strategies for evading confrontation." Raymond Cohen (paraphrased
)
The meaning is not in the words, but in the greater context.
“That’s just great.” (when its not) – “That would be difficult.”Slide9
The low-context communication style
is infused with the can-do, problem-solving spirit, assumes a process of give-and-take, and is strongly influenced by Anglo-Saxon legal habits. When negotiation experts suggest a model of negotiation (usually involving such features as the "joint search for a solution," "isolating the people from the problem," and the "maximization of joint gains"), they are proposing a version of the low-context, problem-solving model. Rational thought is at the base of this model; people are part of the problem, not the solution; each problem can be solved discretely; goals are defined in terms of material, not psychic, satisfactions.
Raymond Cohen
(paraphrased)
The words convey the meaningSlide10
Conflicts
A High Context Perspective
Non-Western negotiators tend to be surprised by their negotiation partner’s ignorance of history, preoccupation with individual rights, obsession with the immediate problem while neglecting the overall relationship, excessive bluntness, impatience, disinterest in establishing a philosophical basis for agreement, extraordinary willingness to make soft concessions, constant generation of new proposals, and inability to leave a problem pending. They are frustrated by their American partner's occasional obtuseness and insensitivity; tendency to see things and present alternatives in black-or-white, either-or-terms; appetite for crisis; habit of springing unpleasant surprises; intimidating readiness for confrontation; tendency to bypass established channels of authority; inability to take no for an answer; and obsession with tidying up loose ends and putting everything down on paper.
Raymond CohenSlide11
Conflicts
A Low Context Perspective
American negotiators tend to be surprised by their negotiation partner’s preoccupation with history and hierarchy, preference for principle over nitty-gritty detail, personalized and repetitive style of argument, lack of enthusiasm for explicit and formal agreement, and willingness to sacrifice substance to form. They are frustrated by their partners' reluctance to put their cards on the table, intransigent bargaining, evasiveness, dilatoriness, and readiness to walk away from the table without agreement. Raymond Cohen
Negotiating Across CulturesSlide12
Low Context Communication Styles
Lang primarily used to express thoughts, feelings, and ideas as clearly/logically as possible
Majority of info carried in explicit verbal messages (less focus on the situational context)
Self-expression valued
Opinions/desires expressed direcetlySlide13
High Context Communication Styles
Value lang as a way to maintain social harmony
Important information carried in contextual cues (time, place, relationship, situation)
Less reliance on explicit verbal messages
Relational harmony valued and maintained by indirect expression of options
Communicators talk “around” the point
Ambiguity and use of silence admired Slide14
Differences btw Verbal & Nonverbal Communication
Single vs Multiple Channels
Discrete vs Continuous
Conscious vs Unconscious
Clear vs AmbiguousSlide15
Single Vs Multiple Channels
In Verbal Com.
emphasis on
orderly and sequential (one word after the other)
In Nonverbal Com.
messages bombard us simultaneously from a multitude of channels (facial expressions, posture, gesture, clothing, proxemics etc)Slide16
Discrete vs Continuous
Verbal messages usually have clear beginnings and endings
Nonverbal com. provides a constant flow of messages (continuous and never ending)
Remember that “Nothing never happens” (even an unanswered call or email is a message)Slide17
Conscious vs Unconscious
In Verbal Com. Usually think about what we want to say before speaking
Most nonverbal messages aren’t deliberate (that’s why it offers so many cues as how one is feeling)Slide18
Clear vs Ambiguous
Verbal com can be confusing
Nonverbal even more vagueSlide19
Illustrators & Regulators
Body Movement indicates attitude, conveys feelings and serves as illustrators and regulators
Illustrators are nonverbal movements that accompany and illustrate verbal communication
Regulators are nonverbal cues that monitor or control the speaking of another individualSlide20
Indicators
You say to the store attendant "I want that one," and point to the dress in the display window. You nod your head up and down to indicate yes and shake it back and forth to indicate no. In other words you imitate the movement you are verbally describing.Slide21
Regulators
While listening to a person you nod your head to indicate that you understand and are in agreement with the speaker. You look away or yawn to indicate that you are bored or would like for the speaker to stop talking. You frown or raise your eyebrows to indicate to the speaker that you either don't believe them or that you don't understand.Slide22
16 ways
Japanese avoid saying “No”
1. Vague “no”
2. Vague and ambiguous “yes” or “no”
3. Silence
4. Counter question
5. Lateral responses
6. Exiting (leaving)
7. Lying (equivocation or making an excuse—
sickness, previous obligation, etc.)
8. Criticizing the question itself
9. Refusing the question
10. Conditional “no”
11. “Yes, but . . .”
12. Delaying answer (e.g., “We will write you a letter.”)
13. Internally “yes,” externally “no”
14. Internally “no,” externally “yes”
15. Apology
16. The equivalent of the English “no”—
primarily used in filling out forms, not in conversationSlide23
No – Maybe Game
Sample questions (make up your own):
What is your name?
Where do you live?
Where do you work or go to school?
Where did you get that shirt you are wearing?
Where did you go on your last vacation?
How much money do you have saved?
Do you like to eat Chinese food?
- make up other questions
To evade a direct answer to any question that you are asked. Slide24
No – Maybe Game
Possible answers / ways of saying "no" without saying "no.“
- vague and ambiguous answer
- ask a question back rather than answering their question
- say something that is not on point
- criticize the question
- active listen, paraphrase, or summarize the question
- make the "no" conditional
- saying "yes, but ..."
- delaying the answer
- making an apology
- silence
- tell a lie or make an excuse
- walking away
Examples. Slide25
Opinion Slide26Slide27
Types of Nonverbal Communication
Posture & Gestures
Face & Eyes
Voice
Touch
Clothing
Distance
Time
Territoriality
Environment Slide28
Posture & Gestures
Kinesics (study of body movement)
Posture is a rich channel for conveying nonverbal com.
Note: Posture echoes (mirroring of sb else’s posture can have positive effects)Slide29Slide30
Face & Eyes (occulistics)
Probably the most noticed parts of the body
Meeting sb’s glance is not appreciated in all cultures (in ours it means involvement)
Ekman & Friesen have identified six basic emotions that facial expressions reflect:
Surprise
Fear
Anger
Disgust
Happiness
Sadness
(possible combinations of these –affect blends)Slide31Slide32Slide33
Voice
Paralanguage (nonverbal, vocal messages)
E.g. Sarcasm (emphasis and tone of voice can change a statement’s meaning)
Research shows that listeners pay more attention to the vocal messages than to the words that are spoken) and vocal message carries more weight
Voice communicates through:
Speed
Volume
Pitch
Number/length of pauses
Disfluencies/exclamations (er, um, ah..)Slide34
Touch (haptics)
Touch plays an important role
Consider males and femalesSlide35
Clothing
Besides protecting us from the elements, clothing is a means of nonverbal com.
We make assumptions about people based on clothing
Messages it can convey:
Economic status
Educational level
Social status
Moral standards
Athletic ability and other interests
Belief system (political, philosophical, religious)
Level of sophisticationSlide36Slide37
Distance (proxemics)
Distance zones (Edward hall)
Intimate distance (begins with skin contact -18 inches) people are emotionally close. Allowing people in this zone is a sign of trust
Personal distance (18 inch-4 feet). Most couples stand in public
Social distance (4-12 feet). Business situations. More formal and impersonal situations
Public distance (+ 12 feet)Slide38
Time (chronemics)
How people use and structure time
E.g. waiting can indicate status in a culture that values timeSlide39
Punctuality
Western AsianSlide40
Territoriality
Personal space is the invisible bubble we carry around us, but territory is a fixed space (desk, room, neighborhood, country) in which we assume some kind of rights in our country.
(e.g. boss has larger desk and office; univ profs have offices ss don’t…shows status)Slide41
Environment
The physical environment people create can both reflect and shape interaction
E.g. our home’s style can communicate things about us
E.g. furniture in fast food restaurants designed to be uncomfortable Slide42
Exercise: Look at these physical actions. Are they acceptable in your national culture?
Smoking
Scratching your head
Touching sb on the arm as you speak to them
Crossing your arms
Looking sb straight in the eyes for 5’’ or more
Putting your feet on the table
Sitting with your legs wide apart
Not looking at sb when you speak to them
Adjusting your clothing: tie, bra, trouser belt
Yawning
Moving close to sb
Whispering to a colleague
Standing with hands on hips
Nodding your head emphatically
Laughing loudly
Blowing your nose