Dr Nicola Ranger DFID Research and Evidence Division Science underpins our commitment to increasing preparedness and resilience The HERR in 2011 highlighted the need for HM Government to go beyond its historical focus on responding to crisis toward a more ID: 379623
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Science for Disaster Risk Management: wh..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Science for Disaster Risk Management: what are the priorities?
Dr Nicola RangerDFID, Research and Evidence DivisionSlide2
Science underpins our commitment to increasing preparedness and resilience…
The HERR in 2011 highlighted the need for HM Government to go beyond its historical focus on responding to crisis, toward a more
anticipatory approach in its humanitarian work, with a greater investment in building the resilience
of least developed countries.DFID committed to making resilience a core part of its approach in all country programmesA continuing theme throughout the HERR was the need to make better use of science in predicting and preparing for natural disasters and in informing investments in resilience. Slide3
Humanitarian Evidence and Innovation Strategy
Focus on four challenges…
One
: Decision-makers do not have routine access to good information about risk. Two: We don’t really know which interventions are most effective in reducing risk, saving lives and rebuilding livelihoods after crises.Three: The capacity to design and deliver humanitarian response and to build resilience is already stretched and will become increasingly overwhelmedFour: The right systems and incentives are not in place to ensure that evidence is available and used to inform decision-making.Slide4
“As humanitarian need grows it is clear we need to find
new and innovative approaches, building a 21st Century approach to disasters”
“We
urgently need larger, sustained investment in preparedness and resilience” Science and Innovation continues to play an important role, e.g.:“For the most part, disasters are no longer the unexpected cataclysms of old. The science of predicting and understanding risk is getting better every day”. Reaffirming our commitment in 2014…WBG-IMF Spring Meetings Resilience Dialogue, 11th April 2014 Innovative early warning systems that improve communication and coordination for response
Monitoring systems to track disasters and their impactsDetailed risk assessmentsSlide5
2012 Foresight report on Reducing Risks of Future Disasters: Priorities for Decision Makers identified significant opportunities for science to better support preparedness and response
: e.g.Higher resolution models, with the potential to increase the reliability of weather forecasting, will become widely available in the next 20 yearsSatellite observing systems combined with improved models could significant improve flood risk assessment and warnings with the next 10 – 20 years
Drought forecasting is expected to mature, partly as a result of improved global observationsSlide6
What are the needs related to risk assessment and early warning systems?
Commissioned scoping study to better understand the needs and opportunities in three regions: South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean.5 month study led by HR Wallingford (with several partners)Components:
Literature reviewCase studies (11 cases led by Practical Action)
Online survey (~300 respondents from regions)Workshops (Caribbean, 3xEast Africa, London)Interviews (~30 in regions) Subsequently followed-up with NERC workshop on scientific opportunities (focused on geophysical hazards)Limited number contributorsSubjective assessment of effectivenessSlide7
1. Progress but not enough…
Source: UNISDRSlide8
1. Progress but not enough…
UNISDR Progress reports may be optimistic, particularly concerning access to risk information at the local level and to vulnerable groups
Drought
FloodSlide9
2. Heterogeneous needs…
Some shared needs – improved communications of information to most vulnerable groups and ‘science to action’Regionally differentiated needs, e.g.Africa – flood/drought assessment and warningsAsia – strong cyclone and flood risk. Weaker on drought and landslides
Caribbean – strong cyclone, weaker drought and flooding
Nationally specific needs – major differences in capacity (e.g. Haiti)Community-specific needs – information does not reach most vulnerableEffectiveness of cyclone warning systemsSlide10
3. The “last mile” is by far the longest…
Underpinning Science and Data
Risk Assessment and Warnings Tools
Communication/ DisseminationResponseSub-Saharan AfricaSouth AsiaCaribbean
Gaps in science for drought & landslides, vulnerability & exposure
Gaps in science for floods & droughts, vulnerability & exposure
Generally, systems in place for main hazards but some gaps
Generally, systems in place for main hazards but some gaps
Considerable gaps in data availability and monitoring
Some systems in place but major gaps, particularly for flooding
Generally, systems in place for main hazards but some gaps
Major gaps in communication to the most vulnerable
Major gaps in communication to the most vulnerable
Information (risk assessments and warnings) does not always lead to action
Information (risk assessments and warnings) does not always lead to action
Information (risk assessments and warnings) does not always lead to action Slide11
Humanitarian Evidence and Innovation Strategy
Focus on four challenges…
One
: Decision-makers do not have routine access to good information about risk. Two: We don’t really know which interventions are most effective in reducing risk, saving lives and rebuilding livelihoods after crises.Three: The capacity to design and deliver humanitarian response and to build resilience is already stretched and will become increasingly overwhelmedFour: The right systems and incentives are not in place to ensure that evidence is available and used to inform decision-making.Slide12
What do we need?
Co-production of risk assessments and warning systems with the intended beneficiariesThe right information, to the right people in the
right wayBuilding trust in information (& the right messenger
)Challenge – how to scale-up effectively and efficiently?Honest broker of risk assessment and warning systemsRobust, reliable and independent evaluation of systems and toolsIncreased accessibility of information Minimum standardsBetter understanding the political economy (at all levels)Better understand major institutional barriers to uptake of information and how these can be overcome; overcoming coordination issuesSlide13
Opportunities for science and innovation…
Next generation of remote sensing data offers opportunities to overcome data scarcity in some areas and enhance science (e.g. Earthquake risk assessment and new sentinel satellite)Shift toward more open access data and models (UNISDR global risk model, Global Earthquake model etc.)
Innovation in seasonal
and multi-annual forecasting could stretch warning lead timesInnovative sources data: crowd-sourcing (e.g. open street map)Big data opportunities (e.g. vast untapped data sources)Slide14
Needs from science…
More open access data and models (filling the gaps)
More disaggregated vulnerability and exposure data (response capacity)
Making risk assessment more relevant: multi-hazard risk assessment, cascading hazards, indirect impactsGreater inter-disciplinarily work – better understanding risk drivers e.g. climate variability and trends, food prices, political instability, etc.Real-time risk monitoring - coupling risk assessment and monitoring/forecasting to produce real-time risk informationLong-term risk projections (risk is not stationary)Direct economic losses and fatalities in low and middle income countries. Source: Munich ReNeed science to get better at articulating and demonstrating its value to decision makersThe right science in the right way -co-production, end-to-end research, the right partners, building local capacity, relevance, honest broker…)Slide15
What are we doing?
Humanitarian Innovation and Evidence Strategy (approx. £40m investment in research and evidence over 5 years), e.g.Improving the application of risk modelling for disaster risk management – Pakistan (with GFDRR)Building evidence base on risk to urban populations in developing countries (with ESRC)
Using risk models to evaluate the benefits of sovereign risk transfer (with the World Bank) – interesting work on risk models to evaluate humanitarian impactsScoping new programme: Science for Humanitarian Emergencies and Resilience (SHEAR)
Challenge – How can we work better together?