g eographic diversity in the ATLAS Collaboration Joleen Pater The University of Manchester UK On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration ICHEP 2016 Chicago Illinois 310 August 2016 The ATLAS Collaboration was founded in 1992 ID: 784691
Download The PPT/PDF document "Studies related to gender and" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Studies related to gender and geographic diversity in the ATLAS Collaboration
Joleen
Pater
The University of Manchester (UK)
On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
ICHEP 2016 – Chicago, Illinois – 3-10 August 2016
Slide2The ATLAS Collaboration was founded in 1992
Diverse membership:
Currently ~5300 members of 94 nationalities2800 scientific authors (mainly PhD physicists and PhD students) from 182 institutions in 38 countriesengineers, technicians and administrative supportStudy Group on Diversity established in 2015assess the diversity within the collaborationcurrent study focuses on gender and geographymake recommendations on how best to support itcollected information onthe demographics of the collaborationhow people participateleadership and management rolesrecognition for contributions
Composition of the ATLAS Collaboration
ICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
2
Slide3Demographic information available:
Institution of affiliation
genderavailable choices: male, female19% are femaleageprofessionnationalityProfessions within ATLASICHEP 2016: 3-10 AugustJ.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
data from CERN registration (self-
declared)
Binomial “uncertainties” on fractions to facilitate comparisons
3
Slide4Collaboration members’ ages span seven
decades
nearly half are younger than 35mostly students and people in term-limited contractsthose 35 or older are mostly in continuing / long-term postsstriking correlation (decrease) in fraction of women with ageAge Distribution, Correlation with GenderICHEP 2016: 3-10 AugustJ.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS4
Slide5Geographical Diversity
ICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS38 countries have at least one ATLAS member institution 94 nationalities are represented in the Collaboration5
Slide6Sorted members into six world regions according to their
i
nstitution of affiliationregions are defined by geographical proximity and to create large, similarly-sized groupssee backup slideHighest fractions of women are in Mediterranean, Northern Europe and North American institutionsmore women among younger half of the collaboration but regional variation is similarCorrelation of Gender with RegionICHEP 2016: 3-10 AugustJ.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
6
Slide7Gender and LeadershipICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
Women
hold
leadership roles in similar
proportion to men
7
Top Level Management
Major Area Coordinators
Inst. Team Leaders (2016)
Physics and
Perf
. Group
Trigger, DP, Comp. & SW Subgroup
Physics and
Perf
. Subgroup
Publications Comm. Members
Speakers Comm. Members
M
ain leadership categories:
Top
Level Management
Spokesperson, two deputy Spokespersons, Technical Coordinator, Resource Coordinator
Major Area Coordinators
responsible for a detector sub-system or a major activity (e.g. Physics analysis, Trigger, Computing,
…
)
Institution Team Leaders
182 Institutions, 225 Team Leaders
Convenors
of Physics
A
nalysis groups:
9 analysis groups
6 combined performance groups
plus associated subgroups
Leaders of Trigger, Data Preparation and Computing/Software subgroups
Publications Committee and Speakers Committee members
Slide8Executive Board is the main steering body of the
collaboration
:Spokesperson (chair)Top Level ManagementDetector Project LeadersMajor Area CoordinatorsChair of Publications CommitteeThree members-at-large from the CollaborationGeographical affiliation shown (last six years)Fraction
s are relative to number of authors from that region
larger fraction of CERN staff are members
no members yet from Southern Hemisphere (95% C.L. limit shown)Governance v. Region
ICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
8
Slide9Talks are allocated by
a Speakers
Committee, using a consistent procedure designed to be equitableA person’s suitability to give a talk is quantified by the number and ‘priority’ of nominations from the relevant Team Leaders and Activity Coordinatorswomen are receiving on average more nominations (see plot), also generally higher-priority nominations (see backup slide)The amount of time a candidate contributes to operational tasks is also consideredwomen contribute proportionately to men
Recognition through Talks
ICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
9
Slide10Recognition through Talks, continued
ICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS10The table shows the fractions of men and women who have given a physics talk at a conference or workshop since 2010
women give more talks than men, especially among longer-time collaborators
partly due to stronger nominations
Also looked for regional correlationnone seen (plot
cover
s past six years)
Slide11Collaboration Meeting TalksICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
ATLAS holds week-long collaboration meetings three times a year:11
Plenary talks are given by members playing key roles
Plots show time evolution of these talks:
top plot is talks by men (blue) and talks by women (red)
bottom plot is fraction given by women
has increased with
time
recent
years are consistent with
current
fraction
of
women
older data on
gender
composition not available for comparison
Slide12The ATLAS Collaboration has ~5000 members
A
bout 19% are femaleWomen contribute proportionately to the experiment and are represented proportionately in leadership roles and as speakers at international conferences and in internal meetings94 nationalities are representedthe various world regions are represented proportionately in leadership positions and recognitionThe fraction of women decreases with ageThe reason is not clear; possible explanations includean increase over time of women’s participation in physics and engineeringthe “leaky pipeline” effect
Details of this study are available as an ATLAS note:https://cds.cern.ch
/record/2202392
Summary and ConclusionsICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
12
Slide13Backup Slides
Slide14Asia
:
Armenia, Azerbaijan, China (incl. Hong Kong), Georgia, Japan, TaiwanEastern Europe: Belarus, Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, Russia (incl. JINR Dubna), Serbia, Slovakia, SloveniaMediterranean: France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, MoroccoNorth America: Canada, USANorthern Europe: Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland (incl. CERN), United KingdomSouthern Hemisphere: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, South Africa
Definition of “Regions”
ICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
14
Slide15In addition to the criteria on slide 9, the Speakers Committee considers
T
he ‘priority’ of nominations from the relevant Team Leaders and Activity Coordinatorse.g. the priority of the Physics Coordination team’s nominations is shown at rightwomen are receiving on average more and higher-priority nominationsneed for professional advancementtime since last talkSpeaker Selection Process
ICHEP 2016: 3-10 August
J.Pater - Diversity Studies in ATLAS
P
lot key:
A nomination priority of 0
means
no nomination was
received
Priority 1: highest weight nomination
Priority 5: lowest weight nomination
15