/
A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use an A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use an

A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use an - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
404 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-13

A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use an - PPT Presentation

Jason Parent Qian Lei University of Connecticut Land cover and land use Land cover the physical material on the earths surface eg water grass asphalt etc Land use the use of the land by humans eg reservoir agriculture parking lot etc ID: 595640

cover land classification building land cover building classification data high large rules area family parking lidar spectral object multi

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A Fully Automated Approach to Classifyin..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use and Cover from LiDAR, Multi-spectral Imagery, and Ancillary Data

Jason Parent

Qian Lei

University of ConnecticutSlide2

Land cover and land use

Land cover: the physical material on the earth’s surface (e.g. water, grass, asphalt, etc.)Land use: the use of the land by humans (e.g. reservoir, agriculture, parking lot, etc.)Fundamental to landscape analyses and urban planning.

2Slide3

Opportunities and challenges for high resolution data

Increasing availability of airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and aerial imagery offers opportunities to study landscapes in great detail.Technically challenging to process…require lots of hard drive

space.datasets must be divided into small subsets for processing.c

onventional algorithms not well suited to processing large numbers of subsetsSlide4

Study objectives and justificationDevelop fully automated algorithm

to classify high resolution (1-meter) land cover / land use which is applicable over large areas.no previously presented algorithm has been feasible to apply over large areas.Specifically, we developed python scripts with ArcGIS to…

classify 1-meter land cover from LiDAR and multispectral data.i

nfer land use from object geometry and spatial context of land cover features.4Slide5

Study areaLocated in eastern Connecticut in the northeastern U.S.

Semi-random stratified sample of 30 1x1 km tiles.Stratified by % impervious cover (according to Connecticut’s Changing Landscape land cover data).

5

0 -

33

33

-

66

66

100

% impervious

4800 km

2Slide6

DataLiDAR

2010 leaf-off fall acquisitionSmall footprint (44 cm)Near-infrared (1064 nm)> 1.5 pts/m2

6

Aerial

orthophotos

2012 leaf-off spring acquisition

Blue

, green, red, and

NIR

0.3 meter

resolutionSlide7

Land cover classification rules7

Land cover

Primary characteristicsBuildingHeight > 2.5m; no ground returns

Low impervious cover (low IC)Low NDVI; no returns 2 to 4.5 meters above groundDeciduous

forestHeight > 3m; high NDVIConiferous forestHeight > 3m; very high NDVIMedium vegetation

Height 0.5

to

3m; high NDVI

Water

No returns

Riparian

wetlands

Low

reflectance in all bands; adjacent to water

Low vegetation

High return

intensity

Pixel- and object-based rules using structural and spectral propertiesSlide8

Land cover classification example

8

deciduous

coniferous

med. veg.

low veg.

water

wetland

building

low ICSlide9

Land cover class accuracies

ClassUser acc. (%)Prod. acc. (%)Water

9685

Building99

97Low vegetation91

94

Wetland

26

35

Low impervious

93

91

Med. vegetation

61

60

Coniferous trees

90

76

Deciduous

trees

95

96

93%

overall

Kappa = 0.90

n = 3200

User accuracy

: probability that a cell label is

correct.

Producer accuracy

: probability that a cell is correctly labelled

.Slide10

Land use classification rules10

Building use

Primary characteristicNon-ResidentialLarge parking area;

flat roof; large building sizeMulti-family residential

Large parking area; narrow building width; similar building shapesSingle family residentialSmall parking area;

peak roof; small building size

Parcel cadastral information not used because of limited availability.

Object- and parcel-based rules using object shape/size and parcel land cover compositionSlide11

Land use preliminary results

deciduous

coniferous

med. veg.

low veg.waterwetland

building

low IC

multi-family

non-

resid

.

single-familySlide12

Land use classification assessment

12small commercial buildings misclassified as single family due to similar structural characteristics

problems caused by mismatch between land cover and parcel data

Qualitative assessment notes…

12Slide13

Conclusions and future work

Land cover classification:

Use of airborne LiDAR and multi-spectral data proved highly effective in classification of high resolution land cover.

Developed fully automated algorithm that performs well over large area.

13

Land use classification:

Use of building shape and context is promising

Future

work will develop rules for classification

of…

r

oads

vs. parking

lots

u

rban

vs. non-urban

forest

a

griculture

vs.

turfSlide14

A Fully Automated Approach to Classifying Urban Land Use and Cover from LiDAR, Multi-spectral Imagery, and Ancillary Data

Jason Parent

Qian Lei

University of Connecticut

Questions?