Eric Almberg The question Initially the United States Constitution did little to protect citizens from action of the states In the twentieth century the Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution to protect the rights of citizens from state governments in a process referred to as incorporation ID: 258586
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "2005 Question 3" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
2005 Question 3
Eric AlmbergSlide2
The question
Initially, the United States Constitution did little to protect citizens from action of the states. In the twentieth century, the Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution to protect the rights of citizens from state governments in a process referred to as incorporation
a. Define selective incorporative
b. For two of the following, explain how each has been incorporated. Each of your explanations must be based on a specific and relevant Supreme Court decision
Rights of criminal defendants
First Amendment
Privacy rightsSlide3
Define selective incorporation
The process by which certain guarantees expressed in the Bill of Rights become applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Under the total incorporation approach, an approach never adopted by a majority of the Supreme Court, all the Bill of Rights and the attendant case law interpreting them, are applied to the states. Under the selective incorporation approach, select rights in the Bill of Rights and their related case law are applied to the states.Slide4
explain how each has been incorporated
Choose from
Rights of criminal defendants
First Amendment
Privacy rights
Use specific and relevant supreme court cases to back up the argument
Rights of criminal defendants
Most obvious case to use is Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Police Officers in the United States were never required by law to read detainees their rights before interrogation because it was assumed they should know them.
Miranda signed a confession never knowing that he could be assigned a lawyer
As a result Miranda rights were established in order to allow detainee awareness and fairnessSlide5
First Amendment
Many Court cases to choose from
Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (1952)
Protection of free speech in films, protecting the right to free speech after attempts were made to restrict film content in the “McCarthy Era”
Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)
Protected the individual right to practice their religions and enforced the separation of church and state after laws were passed regarding practice of religion.
Cohen v. California (1971)
The right to free speech was upheld in the strongest of circumstances after the state of California convicted a man of a code which prohibits “maliciously and willfully disturb[
ing
] the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or person . . . by . . . offensive conduct” and classified wearing a jacket reading “F**k the draft” as offensive conduct. The supreme court upheld his right to speech in this case.
The court case must appeal directly to the individual rights defined in the first amendment, and any case in which they were violated by the state
Good site:
http://www.anarchytv.com/speech/cases.htmlSlide6
Privacy Rights
Again easy major case to chose: Roe v. Wade (1973)
Many States restricted the private right to an abortion though no specific mention of it was made in the constitution
The case abolished nearly every law in existence that put restrictions on abortions, once again putting the power in the people’s hands
Judiciary branch is protection a person’s right to do as they please without the government intervening to a certain extent