/
Leona River Leona River

Leona River - PowerPoint Presentation

pamella-moone
pamella-moone . @pamella-moone
Follow
424 views
Uploaded On 2016-10-13

Leona River - PPT Presentation

Potential Loads and Sources for Bacteria and Nitrates Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville Texas June 4 2013 Lead Agency Texas Soil amp Water Conservation Board ID: 475210

cfu amp flows uvalde amp cfu uvalde flows leona load flow duration day input animal curves production data coli

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Leona River" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Leona River

Potential Loads and Sources for

Bacteria and Nitrates

Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research

Stephenville, Texas

June 4, 2013Slide2

Lead Agency

-

Texas Soil & Water

Conservation Board

Support provided by

Nueces River AuthorityTexas A&M Dept Soil & Crop Sciences & Spatial Sciences Laboratory

AcknowledgementsSlide3

Modeling to Evaluate Water Quality and Sources

Load Duration Curves (LDCs)SELECT (Spatially Explicit Load Enrichment Calculation Tool)Slide4

Load Duration Curves (LDCs)Purpose:

To define flow conditions under which desired loads are exceededDefine potential load reductionsSlide5

Load Duration CurvesLDCs use the following:

Daily stream flow dataAllowable or desired concentrationMeasured concentrations and flowsSlide6

USGS 8204005

TCEQ 12988/12989

USGS 8204250

TCEQ 12987

USGS 8204500

TCEQ 12985

Locations for

Load Duration Curve DevelopmentSlide7

Load Duration Curves

Allowable or desired concentrationPrimary Contract Recreation StandardE. coli 126

cfu/100 mLGeneral Use Screening Level

Nitrate 1.95 mg/LSlide8

Assessment BacteriaSlide9

Assessment NitratesSlide10

Load Duration Curves

Steps -Develop Flow Duration Curve (FDC)(time history of daily flow data)

Calculate allowable loads(criterion or screening level)Estimate measured loads(measured concentrations and flow)

Compare measured to allowable loadsSlide11

Flow Duration Curves (FDCs)

Daily stream flows for a given time period ranked highest to lowest

Flow

Condition

Percent

Time Exceeded

High Flows

0-10%

Moist

Conditions

10-40%

Mid-Range

Conditions

40-60%

Dry

Conditions

60-90%

Low

Flows

90-100%Slide12

Use of LDCs for Source Identification

Source Graphic:

http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/basic.htm#dataThe Kansas Department of Health and Environment

High Flows

Mid-

Range

DryLow

Flows

MoistSlide13

FDC Leona River near Uvalde

1970 – 2010Slide14

LDC

E. coli

- Leona River near Uvalde

Criterion

126 cfu

/100 mLSlide15

Potential Reductions

% Reduction = (Allowable – Measured) Measured * 100Averaged by Flow CategorySlide16

LDC E. coli Leona River near UvaldeSlide17

Average Percent Reduction E. coli

NA

indicates not applicable, because most low flows were

zero flow.Slide18

LDC Nitrates Leona River near Divot

E. coli

data 1972 – 2012Slide19

Average Percent Reduction Nitrate

NA

indicates not applicable, because most low flows were zero

flow.Slide20

Potential Reductions Needs

Bacteria & Nitrate primarily at higher flows associated with rainfall-runoff

Bacteria lower flows indicated near BatesvilleNitrateslower flows indicated near Divot

Load Duration Curve - SummarySlide21

Questions

??s

Load Duration CurvesSlide22

SELECT

(S

patially Explicit Load E

nrichment Calculation Tool)

Developed by Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering and Spatial Sciences Laboratory at Texas A&M University by Dr. R. Karthikeyan, Dr. R. Srinivasan and others

Modeling Bacteria SourcesSlide23

Identifies

POTENTIAL bacteria loadings by

subwatershed Based on spatial data, such as:Land use

SoilsStream networkAnimal densityPopulation information

SELECTSlide24

Spatial Science Laboratory Texas A&M University in College Station

Satellite imagery

Aerial photosGround control pointsGround verificationSlide25

Population & Household Densities

Census dataLivestock Densities

County Agricultural Statistics (USDA)WildlifeResource Experts (TPWD & others)Domestic & Feral Animals

Resource Experts (TPWD & others)

Input DataSlide26

Wastewater Treatment Facilities

UvaldeBatesville

US Fish & Wildlife Service National Fish HatcheryConcentrated Animal Feeding OperationsChaparral Cattle Feedlot (Uvalde)Live Oak Feedlot (Batesville)

Permitted FacilitiesSlide27

98%

99.8%

2%

6

8%

95%

32%

5%

4%

11%

84%

80%

17%

2%Slide28

CAFOs

Chaparral Cattle Feedlot south of

Uvalde(10,000 permitted head)Live Oak Feedlot southeast Batesville(8,000 permitted head)

Input

E. coli production rate 1E10 cfu

/animal/day assuming “treatment” efficiency of 80%Slide29

Cattle #s in Leona

Uvalde 5,516

Zavala 10,566 Frio 6,418

Input Fecal Production RateCattle 10E10 cfu

/animal/daySlide30

Input Fecal Production RateCattle 10E10

cfu/animal/day

Cattle distributed on Grassland Herbaceous and Pasture/Hay

Cattle #s in Leona

Uvalde 5,516

Zavala 10,566 Frio 6,418Slide31

Feral Hog #s in Leona

21,462

Input Fecal Production Rate

Feral Hogs 1.1E10 cfu/animal/day

Feral Hogs distributed on 100 meter buffer of stream in non-developed areasSlide32

Input Fecal Production Rate

Sheep/Goats 1.2E10

cfu/animal/day

Sheep/Goats distributed on Grassland Herbaceous, Pasture/Hay,

Shrubland & Woodland

Sheep/Goats #sin Leona Uvalde 8,055 Zavala 1,269

Frio 168Slide33

Deer #s in Leona

16.8/1,000 acres

Input Fecal Production Rate

Deer 3.5E8 cfu/animal/day

Deer distributed on Near-Riparian Forest, Shrubland & WoodlandSlide34

Dog #s in Leona

1.6/household

Input Fecal Production Rate

Dogs 5.0E9 cfu/animal/day

Homes in each subbasin based on 2010 Census Block DataSlide35

Masks out areas covered by public wastewater service areas

Homes in each

subbasin based on 2010 Census Block Data

Uses NRCS Soils Data to define Septic Drainage Limitation Class

Effluent Rate 10E6

cfu/100 mL with discharge of 60 gal/person/day for systems on soils with septic limitationsSlide36

Urban

Discharge (MGD)

Uvalde WWTF outfall #1

0.2604

Uvalde WWTF outfall #2

0.6138

Uvalde WWTF outfall #3

0.0558

Batesville

0.184

Fish Hatchery

0.8

Effluent EC rate based on 126

cfu

/100 mlSlide37

SELECT does not yet handle

Exotics

Small wildlife (birds, raccoons, etc)

Sources not includedSlide38

SELECT

Indicates potential loadings based on a “worst case” scenario

Highlight “hot spots” to consider for control effortsThese are preliminary results open to stakeholder feedbackSlide39

Contact Information

Nikki Jackson

Email: njackson@tiaer.tarleton.edu

Office

Phone: 254.968.1920Anne McFarland

Email: mcfarla@tiaer.tarleton.eduOffice Phone: 254.968.9581Slide40

Questions?

Thank You

Anne McFarland

Texas

Institute for Applied Environmental Researchmcfarla@tiaer.tarleton.edu254.968.9581