Responses opened from Thursday November 2nd until Wed nesday November 15 2017 Date Created Sunday October 29 2017 135 Total Responses Complete Responses 135 Q1 Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the City proposed Residential Infill ProjectRIP a Overlay ID: 653335
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "RCPNA Residential Infill Project (RIP) 2..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
RCPNA Residential Infill Project (RIP) 2017 Questionnaire
Responses opened from Thursday November 2nd until
Wed
nesday
November 15, 2017Slide2
Date Created: Sunday, October 29, 2017
135
Total Responses
Complete Responses: 135Slide3Slide4Slide5
Slide6
Q1: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the City proposed Residential Infill Project(RIP) 'a' Overlay?
Answered: 135 Skipped: 0Slide7
Q1: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the City proposed Residential Infill Project(RIP) 'a' Overlay?
Answered: 135 Skipped: 0Slide8
Slide9
Slide10
Slide11
Q2: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the rezone of Historically Skinny Lots from R5 (5,000 sq. ft) to R2.5 (2,500 sq. ft)?
Answered: 134 Skipped: 1Slide12
Q2: Do you support RCPNA in rejecting the rezone of Historically Skinny Lots from R5 (5,000 sq. ft) to R2.5 (2,500 sq. ft)?
Answered: 134 Skipped: 1Slide13
Slide14
Q3: Do you support RCPNA in recommending no limitations to allowed off-street parking for skinny lots up to 36-feet wide?
Answered: 131 Skipped: 4Slide15
Q3: Do you support RCPNA in recommending no limitations to allowed off-street parking for skinny lots up to 36-feet wide?
Answered: 131 Skipped: 4Slide16
Slide17
Q4: Do you support RCPNA recommendation of applying the 'a' Overlay only to Single Dwelling zoned properties located within 300-feet of current Frequent Transit bus lines, Max Stations, and Town and Regional Centers?
Answered: 131 Skipped: 4Slide18
Q4: Do you support RCPNA recommendation of applying the 'a' Overlay only to Single Dwelling zoned properties located within 300-feet of current Frequent Transit bus lines, Max Stations, and Town and Regional Centers?
Answered: 131 Skipped: 4Slide19
Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov. 20th Discussion Draft comment deadline?
Answered: 134 Skipped: 1Slide20
Q5: Do you support RCPNA asking for an "Extension" of the Nov. 20th Discussion Draft comment deadline?
Answered: 134 Skipped: 1Slide21
Q6: If an "Extension" to this deadline is requested which of the following indicates the extent of time needed?
Answered: 134 Skipped: 1Slide22
Q6: If an "Extension" to this deadline is requested which of the following indicates the extent of time needed?
Answered: 134 Skipped: 1Slide23
No Question PosedSlide24
RCPNA Board Meeting Tues. November 7th
Unanimously approved the recommendation:
“Request a 6-month Extension to the Nov. 30
th
, 2017, comment deadline for the City of Portland RIP Discussion Draft”Slide25
Slide26
Slide27
Slide28
City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS)
BPS recently extended the deadline for public comments to the RIP Discussion Draft to 5:00 pm on Thursday November 30
, 2017, See:
https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/67728
RCPNA LU & TC has the authority by Charter to render a decision on behalf of RCPNA when the item in question is time sensitive and does not allow the Board the opportunity to review the proposal. This is the case with the RIP Discussion Draft.
LU & TC Possible Actions Include:
Forwarding the RCPNA Board recommended 6-mo extension, only;
Recommending approval of the Oct. 19
th
Tentative Recommendations (possibly amended) together with the 6-month extension request;
Bullet #2 with questionnaire summary.
No ActionSlide29
Thank
You for Your Participation
Tamara DeRidder, AICP
Principal, TDR & Associates