/
VISTA: VISTA:

VISTA: - PowerPoint Presentation

pamella-moone
pamella-moone . @pamella-moone
Follow
383 views
Uploaded On 2017-07-03

VISTA: - PPT Presentation

The Telescope challenge Systems Engineering the Solution Systems Engineering at the Core of VISTA Design UK ATC Project Office Proposal The purpose of VISTA is to conduct largescale semiautomated surveys of the sky at IR and visible wavelengths Our concept of VISTA is not a conventional ID: 566271

scrutiny presentation 2000 dec presentation scrutiny dec 2000 panel vista design eso phase consortium cost telescope plane visible focal definition3x3 designs 4x4

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "VISTA:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

VISTA: The Telescope challenge

Systems Engineering the Solution?Slide2

Systems Engineering at the Core of VISTA Design

UK ATC Project Office Proposal

“The purpose of VISTA is to conduct large-scale semi-automated surveys of the sky at IR and visible wavelengths. Our concept of VISTA is not a conventional 4m telescope with instruments.

We regard VISTA as a single integrated camera with an IR and a Visible channel, in which the "telescope" is really the fore-optics.”Slide3

Phase A and Phase B

Phase A proposal

Can VISTA actually be achieved for the Money?

Develop designs to level to demonstrate compliance with Science Requirements

Determine the best strategy for

maximising functionality within budget and timescalesAgree Strategy and Deliverables before starting Phase B

Phase B

Follows successful Phase A

Same personnel

Procurement

Testing

Integration

Commissioning

Enhanced VISTA

Additional funding for full functionalitySlide4

Cost v’s Change v’s Time

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

4Slide5

Cost v’s Change v’s Time

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

5

End Phase ASlide6

Cost v’s Change v’s Time

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

6

End Phase A

By the end of Phase A the design is essentially locked in Slide7

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

7

Design Development

JIF Design Baseline resulting in f/2.5 primary

Brainstorm of various layouts

f/1 identified as potential cost saver

f/1 and f/2.5 progressed to level demonstrating a clear advantage to the f/1 design

Need to concentrate on one design

MO recommended proceeding with f/1 design

scheduled Design Validation Review

VEB approved development of f/1 in

interim as long lead procurementSlide8

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

8

VISTA Designs

f/2.5

JIF design

f/1 with both instruments mounted at cassegrain focus

f/1

was clearly

more cost

effective

f/1 has tolerance issues on M2

Design

still based on 3x3 arraySlide9

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

9

The Design Validation Review

Purpose

Review choice of design

MO has identified f/1 type design as most suitable for VISTA

Close out all design other optical layouts

Determine of choice is correct

Identify any issues in adopting this approachSlide10

The ESO involvement

Who’s

the Customer?

Vista

Consortium?

ESO?Pros and ConsSiteStandards

Requirements

SOWs

Software definition

Hardware definition

3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

10Slide11

The ESO involvement

Who’s

the Customer?

Vista

Consortium?

ESO?

Pros and Cons

Site

Standards

Requirements

SOWs

Software definition

Hardware definition

3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

11

Consortium

ESO

Slide12

The ESO involvement

Who’s

the Customer?

Vista

Consortium?

ESO?Pros and Cons

Site

Standards

Requirements

SOWs

Software definition

Hardware definition

3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

12

Consortium

ESO

Slide13

Filming “

OO7: Quantum of Solace

”Slide14

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

14

Paranal Geology

Where is the bedrock?

Plateau 20m excavation

NTT 5m leveling

What about construction?

Plateau: Dust, noise pollution

What about Utilities?

Plateau £0.3m

NTT £0.5mSlide15

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

15Slide16
Slide17

The ESO involvement

Who’s

the Customer?

Vista

Consortium?

ESO?Pros and ConsSite

Standards

Requirements

SOWs

Software definition

Hardware definition

3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

17

Consortium

ESO

Slide18

Requirements

All requirements:

Shall be

unambiguous and tied to performance metrics that are verifiable, achievable and realistic.

Shall not be

solution specific, vague or impossible to verify. 12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

18Slide19

and Goals?

Goals

are not

requirements.

Though they may become requirementsLogical development (with additional resources, funding etc.)

By osmosis – Spec creep

Goals:

 

shall

not be needed to achieve the science performance (that is a requirement).

Each

goal must have an underlying requirement.

As soon as cost and/or schedule are compromised by a goal, the goal is either amended or dropped.

The

only benefit of including a goal is during in the early stages of

development

, steering choices between design options

.

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

19Slide20

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

20Slide21

The ESO involvement

Who’s

the Customer?

Vista

Consortium?

ESO?Pros and ConsSite

Standards

Requirements

SOWs

Software definition

Hardware definition

3x3 to 4x4 NIR focal plane

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

21

Consortium

ESO

Slide22

Spec creep?

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

22Slide23

Spec creep?

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

23

It was not the size of the focal plane but the cold stop re-imaging requirement that made this a technical issue.

( not to mention cost of detectors and controllers) Slide24

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

24

VISTA Designs

f/2.5

JIF design

f/1 with both instruments mounted at cassegrain focus

f/1

was clearly

more cost

effective

f/1 has tolerance issues on M2

Design

still based on 3x3 arraySlide25

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

25

VISTA Designs

“The purpose of VISTA is to conduct large-scale semi-automated surveys of the sky at IR and visible wavelengths. Our concept of VISTA is not a conventional 4m telescope with instruments.

We regard VISTA as a single integrated camera with an IR and a Visible channel, in which the "telescope" is really the fore-optics.”Slide26

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

26

VISTA Designs

“The purpose of VISTA is to conduct large-scale semi-automated surveys of the sky at IR and visible wavelengths. Our concept of VISTA is not a conventional 4m telescope with instruments.

We regard VISTA as a single integrated camera with an IR and a Visible channel, in which the "telescope" is really the fore-optics.”

End Phase ASlide27

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

27

On Axis IR camera - cold bafflesSlide28

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

28Slide29

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

29

Encircled Energy at KsSlide30

VISTA Field of ViewSlide31

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

31Slide32

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

32

End Phase A

By the end of Phase A the design was essentially locked in Slide33

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

33Slide34

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

34Slide35

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

35Slide36

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

36Slide37

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

37Slide38

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

38Slide39
Slide40

Acknowledgements

12 Dec 2000

Scrutiny Panel Presentation

40

Key players

Adrian Russell

Jim

Emerson

Will

Sutherland

VISTA

f/1 guilty party

Mark

Casalli

Eli

Atad

Martin Fisher

Stefano

Stangellini

Presentation

Andy Born