/
Collaborative Conceptual Design of a U.A.V Collaborative Conceptual Design of a U.A.V

Collaborative Conceptual Design of a U.A.V - PowerPoint Presentation

pasty-toler
pasty-toler . @pasty-toler
Follow
433 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-10

Collaborative Conceptual Design of a U.A.V - PPT Presentation

Initial Concept Proposed by Virginia Tech and Loughborough University to meet requirements stipulated by NAVAIR Background Annual collaboration project Virginia Tech Loughborough University August 2007 May 2008 ID: 356802

amp concepts daniel rob concepts amp rob daniel design concept loughborough wing minimum hours tail 000 ground alex lbs

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Collaborative Conceptual Design of a U.A..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Collaborative Conceptual Design of a U.A.V

Initial Concept Proposed by Virginia Tech and Loughborough University to meet requirements stipulated by NAVAIRSlide2

Background

Annual collaboration project

Virginia Tech

Loughborough UniversityAugust 2007 – May 2008 Specified by NAVAIR

Slide3

Team Members

Virginia Tech

Robert Briggs

Philip PesceAmanda Chou

Anthony RicciardiJessica McNeilusErik SundayMegan Prince

Ricky DuelleyBelle BredehoftMichael ShermanAlex KovacicDennis Preus

Loughborough University

Daniel Marshall

Daniel Jones

Kris Hanna

Rob Noble

Craig Dillon

Peter Christie

Rob Penn

Steve Bennett

Andrew Courtneidge

Balraj Chand

Ben Hanson

Alex HumphreySlide4

Brief

To design, build and test an unmanned surveillance vehicle, that can perform the following:

Cruise speed of 50 kt (knots)

Top Speed of 70 ktRange of 15 nm (nautical miles)Minimum endurance of eight hours

Service ceiling of 10,000 ft at half fuelNormal operational altitude of 3000 ft or 2000 ft above ground level (AGL)Minimum turn rate of 6 degrees per second

Climb rate of at least 200 ft/min at sea level

Maximum Gross Take-Off Weight (MGTOW) of 300 lbs

Minimum payload of 30 lbs (45 lbs desired)

Payload power source of 10 watts

Noise levels below 50 dBA at 200 ft.

All weather operation with a 10 kt crosswind landing capability

Capable of rail catapult pneumatic launch

Landing within a 50 ft x 250 ft parking lot

Less than one flight failure per 100,000 hours of flight

GPS based autonomous operations

Dynamic re-tasking from ground controllersSlide5

Competitors

Outrider 385lbs (175kg)

Pioneer 450lbs (204kg)

Shadow 375lbs (170kg)

Watchkeeper 430lbs (195kg)Slide6

Methodology

Virginia Tech

Broke into two groups and developed two separate concepts.

Loughborough UniversityDeveloped two concepts as a group.Met, and decided on a concept as a whole.Slide7

Concepts

Twin Boom

Conventional H-tail

Pylon Mounted PropSlide8

Concepts

Interchangeable Parts

Standard Wing

TailsWing LocationAuxiliary PowerSlide9

Concepts

Critical Points

Complexity of Design

NoiseC of GSafetyEngine Type (Pusher vs. Puller)

Engine PlacementThrust LineLaunch & LandingPropeller ProtectionWeightSlide10

Downselection

List Advantages & Disadvantages

Eliminated Twin Tail Boom

Discussed in Smaller GroupsChose PylonSuggested ModificationsSlide11

Downselection

Due to:

Noise

Prop ProtectionDiversity of Options

CoolingMaintenanceModificationsWing Placement

Tractor vs. PusherConventional TailSlide12

Final Concept

Assembled by Parts

Fuselage & Pylon

Wing LocationTail & EmpennageEngine OrientationUndercarriageSlide13

Final ConceptSlide14

General ArrangementSlide15

Key Features

Good access for maintenance

Large internal fuselage volume

Proven Design

High aspect ratio wing

Modular assembly

Simple structure for design and manufactureSlide16

Reliability

Addressed as a key issue.

- 1 or less uncontrolled crashes per 100,000 hours

Methods to determine Reliability - FMEA/FMECA & FTA Fussell-Vessely – prioritises importance of sub-systemsSlide17

TimelineSlide18

Work Breakdown

Task

Team Member(s)

Structures/Manufacturing

Rob Penn, Ricky Duelley

Propulsion

Daniel Jones, Dennis Preus

Reliability

Erik Sunday, Balraj Chand

Aerodynamics

Anthony

Ricciardi, Ben Hanson

Performance

Steve Bennett, Megan Prince

Stability/ Control

Andy

Courtneidge, Peter Christie, Phil Pesce

CAD

Alex

Kovacic, Alex Humphrey, Michael Sherman

Systems Integration

Belle

Bredehoft, Rob Noble

Costs

Jessica

McNeilus, Kris Hanna

Ground Support

Craig Dillon, Robert Briggs

Leadership/Planning

Daniel Marshall, Amanda ChouSlide19

Questions?