Future Lifestyles On Residential Recycling Programs Canadian Waste Sector Symposium Montreal Quebec November 9 2011 Geoff Love Love Environment Maria Kelleher Kelleher Environmental 1 ID: 295924
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Impacts Of" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Impacts Of Future Lifestyles On Residential Recycling Programs
Canadian Waste Sector SymposiumMontreal, QuebecNovember 9, 2011Geoff Love, Love EnvironmentMaria Kelleher, Kelleher Environmental
1
Love EnvironmentSlide2
Presentation OutlineLooking at the futureStart with the past and presentBrief look at how residential recycling has evolvedRecent changes to residential recycling materialsResearch on future lifestylesWhat this means for residential recycling system planning
2Love EnvironmentSlide3
Residential Recycling in 1980’s and 1990’sLife used to be simple (in the old days!)Many original residential recycling programs developed in Canada and the US late 1980’s and 1990’s
For 20 years, our efforts have focussed on:Collecting paper, glass, metals, plasticsExpanding materials we collectStabilizing markets for processed materialsIncreasing participation and capture of materialsDriving recovery up and driving costs downMaking the system more efficient3Love EnvironmentSlide4
Recycling Systems More Complex From 2005 On….More materials added to residential recycling programsGreen Bin programs added to complexity of collectionMore single stream recycling systemsMRFs became larger and more complexMore user pay systems and container limitsLess garbage some communities moved to bi-weekly garbage collectionincreased capture in recycling programs
Composition and amounts of recyclables stayed generally the same4Love EnvironmentSlide5
Things began to Change in the late 2000’sComposition of recycling stream began to changeResidue rates increasedMarkets began to complain about quality of materials from MRFsOperators began to notice a drop in ONP (significant in some cases) and increase in OCCWith drop in paper and increase in convenience packaging, composition of recycling stream very different to a few years earlier – more items/picks; less weight/tonnes
5Love EnvironmentSlide6
Implications of Changing Residential Recycling Material Composition on Recycling SystemMore plastics, less glass, less newspapers, more corrugated containersImpacts on collection systemLess heavier material
More lightweight and low density materialTruck will cube out soonerIncreases collection costsMRF designs need to change to accommodate different material mixMaterial revenues will be affected (reduced)6Love EnvironmentSlide7
Toronto Recycling Material Revenues (to the mid 2000s)71% to 75% of revenues from paper10% of revenues from aluminum10% to 12% of revenues from HDPE and PETIf paper continues to decrease, impacts on revenues could be significant
7Love EnvironmentSlide8
Background to Toronto Future Blue Bin Study (2010)Toronto Residential Garbage, Green Bin and Blue Bin tonnages all lower 2009 vs 2008Significant drop in paper
fibres collected 2009 vs 2008 (15%)Lower paper tonnages had a significant impact on program revenues10-year Business Plan was being developedStaff needed to understand materials and amounts in the future Blue Bin for business planningKelleher Environmental hired to carry out a “high level” study to provide directional information8
Love EnvironmentSlide9
Future Blue Bin Study Project ElementsResearch future lifestylesResearch future packaging trendsCarry out in-store “packaging audits”Develop projections of Blue Bin tonnages and composition by material for 5 years and 10 years out
9Love EnvironmentSlide10
Predicting the Future Is ChallengingYou can try to put well researched facts into sophisticated models, however, these are not always right…Leisure society due to automation“Paperless” society Bigger picture – life is changing and will continue to changeThe future is not “more of the same” – not just faster computers, high tech cars, smarter homes, more TV channels, but something differentLarge body of work by “futurists” used for this study
10Love EnvironmentSlide11
Literature on the Future “I’ve seen the future brother, and its murder” - Leonard CohenFuturists:Centre for Future Studies; The Futurist; Forum for the Future; World Future Society, etcMore traditional literature:Canadian Food Trends to 2020The Future Consumer (Capgemini, UK)
The Future of Consumer Products Industry (IBM Global)Twilight of the American NewspaperDemographic Trends, etc.11Love EnvironmentSlide12
Demographic TrendsAging Canadianswe are living longerEvolving HouseholdsSmaller householdsFewer ChildrenMore 1-person households
More urban dwellersMore multi-family units (>50% in Toronto)12Love EnvironmentSlide13
Lifestyle TrendsThe Internet …(has changed everything)Handheld and mobile devices changing the way we live and communicateChanging meal patterns – fewer family dinnersShifting expenditures – more take away foodNewer faces in Canada – larger variety of foods
More shopping via internet – more food packagingConvenience is king…Re-sealable packagesMore ready to eat meals - e.g. salads from grocery storesComplicated packaging (to accommodate arthritic hands)More plastic packagingSmaller portion packaging13
Love EnvironmentSlide14
The “Death” of Newspapers
14Love EnvironmentSlide15
Ontario ONP Numbers Dropping Significantly 2007 to 200915
Love EnvironmentSlide16
Impacts Of Drop in ONP in MRFPrinted paper was 55% ONP; 45% other paperNow 45% or less ONP; 55% or more other paperHarder/impossible to create #8 News baleMRFs now produce #6 News baleMills are getting used to this change (as they need the fibre)Used to think this was single stream system issue – now understand its a more complex combination of factors at play
16Love EnvironmentSlide17
Impacts of Internet on Residential RecyclingLess/smaller newspapersMore shopping by internetPurchases are delivered by corrugated or boxboard container More OCC and OBB showing up in residential recycling programs
17Love EnvironmentSlide18
Growth in US Internet Sales (as % of total sales)
18Love EnvironmentSlide19
Growth in Canadian Internet Sales ($ billion per year)
19Love EnvironmentSlide20
12 Packaging Trends Which Will Impact Residential RecyclingLight-weightingIncrease in multi-layer packagingMaterial substitution (mostly plastic replacing glass, Al, steel)
More fruits/veg packaged in thermoform plasticMore ready cooked meals and take out packaging (in thermoform plastic)SUPs (stand up pouches)Re-sealable packagingMore smaller single serve packagesMore snack packagingBrand owner and retailer led initiative (Sustainable packaging)Smart packaging – can tell when food is beginning to decayIncrease in bio-based packaging
20
Love EnvironmentSlide21
Projected Residential Recycling Material Changes Relative amounts of fibre and containers will change over time More plastic, less paperNewsprint amounts will decrease over time
Toronto ONP down 15% 2008 to 2009OCC will increase over timeAmount of plastic packaging will increaseGlass will decreaseMetals will stay about the same21
Love EnvironmentSlide22
Background To Toronto 2010 Packaging AuditsIdentify extent to which consumer items purchased in Toronto stores were in packaging which is:Recyclable now or Could be recycled in the future orIs unlikely to be recycled in the future
Look at packaging audit methods used elsewhere and modify to suit Toronto 2010 circumstances22Love EnvironmentSlide23
Packaging Audit Approaches From Other Jurisdictions“War on Waste” - UK Local Government Associationpurchase basket of goods (30) in 8 different stores to compare packaging efficiencyRepeated 2007, 2008, 2009The ULS (Use Less Stuff) Packaging Efficiency Study as it Relates To Waste Prevention (US)
300 products in different packaging formatsRepeated 1995, 200723Love EnvironmentSlide24
2010 Packaging AuditsPurchased 150 items in large grocery store:Consumer Price Index list (60 items) – reflected typical “shopping basket” in the early Blue Box yearsUse Less Stuff (ULS) US report listNew products identified through store visit which would not have been popular when CPI startedNew packaging formats which are gaining in popularity
Weighed empty package (each component) and package when full of product24Love EnvironmentSlide25
2010 Packaging AuditsCategorize each component as: Recyclable now; Recyclable in all plastic film program; Recyclable in all plastics program; Not recyclable for foreseeable future“Normalize” the data to take account of typical annual purchases of each product.
25Love EnvironmentSlide26
26
Love EnvironmentSlide27
27
Love EnvironmentSlide28
28
Love EnvironmentSlide29
Packaging Audit Results By Weight
29Love EnvironmentSlide30
Packaging Audit ConclusionsAudit provides “snapshot” of the range of packaging formatsMany packages are recycled in current Toronto program“All film” program would increase diversionIncrease in thermoform PET for wide range of products“All plastics” program would increase diversionMany multi-layer packages which are not recyclable
30Love EnvironmentSlide31
Comparison of Canadian Imports and Exports of PCF from 2000-200931Slide32
We collect it…we just can use (all) of it32Slide33
Plastics Exports (in pounds)Plastic export graph from Jerry Powell presentation at Halifax33
Love EnvironmentSlide34
The China Factor: Growth in Paper Manufacturing Business (2000 to 2015)
34Love EnvironmentSlide35
Implications Of Changing Composition on Business PlanningFuture tonnages and composition impact on:CollectionProcessingMarketsRevenues
35Love EnvironmentSlide36
Future ScenariosBased on Forum for the Future DEFRA work in UKModified for Canada/TorontoThree Scenarios Developed
Status Quo – focus on regionalFast Changes – good economy, increased oil prices, focus on globalSmaller World – bad economy, very high energy prices, focus on localMost Likely Scenario - Hybrid36Love EnvironmentSlide37
Recycling Material Tonnages in Toronto 2020 vs 2010 Baseline15% reduction in weight per household of printed paper and packaging in Blue Bin over 10 yearsReduction of 18% paper kg/
hh/year17% increase in plastic kg/hh/yearAmount of metals stays the same – flat kg/hh/yearDecrease of 50% glass kg/hh/year37
Love EnvironmentSlide38
ConclusionsThe world is changing at a rapid rate:Lifestyles are changingPackaging formats are changingAll of these changes impact on recycling business plansToronto Future Blue Bin Study was first to look at this issue and translate estimates into Business PlanningNeed to “refresh” the lifestyle and packaging research annually or bi-annually to catch new trends and plan for their impacts
38Love EnvironmentSlide39
Thank YouGeoff Loveloveenvironment@routcom.com647-248-2500Maria Kellehermaria@kellenv.com416-567-7439
39Love Environment