Sem feedback forum STEERING COMMITTEE - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Sem

feedback forum

STEERING COMMITTEEMARY JO SEKELSKYBARBARA DIXONBOB BARNETTVAHID LOTFIGREG LAURENCEBRAD MAKISUSAN GANO-PHILLIPSAIMI MOSSROY BARNESJAY GANDHI

May 21 & M

ay

27, 2015

Sem process framework

1. Align institutional strategic plan with broad enrollment targets and desired mix of students

2. Data gathering and assessment:

Internal culture/environment, student enrollment behaviors and scan of external environment

3. Use data results to establish focused goals each for recruitment, retention, service, etc., and enrollment projection models

4. Approve strategic goals and enrollment projection models

5. Develop action steps, accountability, and

metrics

6. Implement action steps

7. Monitor progress,

Report results to campus and executive leadership

Executive Team

SEM Steering Committee

Smaller group of staff and faculty adept at economics and data use

Goals recommended by SEM Recruitment and Retention Councils; models developed by Data Team

Executive Team

SEM Steering Committee

SEM councils and sub-committees

Appropriate staff and faculty departments

SEM Steering Committee

Chief Enrollment Officer

Mid-course

adjustments

Changes

to goals

Additional requests, clarifying questions

New or revised goals

Data team

Roy Barnes, Co-ChairJay Gandhi, Co-ChairJon DavidsonBrad Maki

Aimi MossKaren ArnouldLori VedderDan AdamsDeb WhiteFawn Skarsten

UM-flint ten-Year Trend

33.5 % overall increase since 2005

24.8% undergraduate increase since 200599% graduate increase since 2005

International enrollment

Decreasing production of High School Graduates nationwide

Michigan among most affected nationwideAnticipated contraction of 20% by 2020 in Michigan

Source: WICHE Knocking at the College Door

Decreasing production of High School Graduates - Michigan

Source: WICHE

Knocking at the College Door, Michigan projections

Decreasing production of High School Graduates – Genesee County

10.6% drop 2010 – 2014

25.3% drop 2010 – 2020

Decline in community college enrollment

17.7% drop overall

26.5% drop Mott CCTransfer students make up 66% of new undergraduates each yearApproximately 45% of transfer students come from Mott Community College

UM-FLINT HISTORICAL RETENTION RATES FTIAC

Source: UM Flint Institutional Assessment, Fawn

Skarsten

UM-FLINT DOMESTIC FTIAC

Domestic FTIAC

Start Term

Starting count

%

retained to second fall

%

retained to third fall

Fall 2008

897

71.6%

50.3%

Fall 2009

761

69.6%

54.4%Fall 2010667

67.2%59.1%Fall 2011

567

71.3%59.4%

Fall 201253378.4%

62.3%Fall 2013

639

68.9%??Source: Historical UM Flint data files (not tied to official IPEDS totals)

Roughly 40-50% of all freshmen are gone after two years

TOP CHOICES FOR NEXT INSTITUTION AFTERUM-FLINT (ALL STUDENTS with known destinations, N=3478)

Mott Community College (32.4%)

Baker College – Flint (11.2%)

Oakland Community College (5.1%)

UM – Ann Arbor (3.2%)

Lansing Community College (3.1%)

Michigan State University (2.6%)

Central Michigan University (2.5%)

Oakland University (2.5%)

Davenport University (1.7%)

University of Phoenix (1.7%)

Delta College (1.6%)

Saginaw Valley State University (1.4%)

St. Clair Community College (1.4%)Eastern Michigan (1.4%)

Unknown (N=3333)

Other (28.2%)

Recruitment council

Greg Laurence, Management, Co-ChairBrad Maki, Graduate Programs, Co-ChairMelva Craft-Blacksheare, Nursing

Chris Heidenreich, MusicMelissa Brown, University RelationsJon Davidson, Undergraduate AdmissionsLori Vedder, Financial AidDan Adams, International CenterDeb White, Extended Learning

Recruitment goal recommendations

Maintain average number of FTIAC (Fall) at 700

Diversify the recruitment geography Reduce number of Promise (Challenge) ScholarsStrategically recruit DEEP and Early College studentsIncrease international students 60% by Fall 2020Increase availability of online programs

Recruitment goal recommendations

Mitigate potential loss of new transfer students to no more than -10%

Creating better pathways from selected institutionsIncreased international studentsIncreased availability of online programsGrow new graduate enrollment XX% by Fall 2020 so that graduate students make up 20-22% of total enrollmentNew programsIncreased international studentsIncreased online students

RETENTION council

Susan Gano-Phillips, Arts & Sciences, Co-ChairAimi Moss, Student Success Center, Co-ChairAmelia

Biehl, EconomicsJan Furman, EnglishKrista Hansen, MathematicsKazuko Hiramatsu, EnglishSarah Rosaen, CommunicationStephen Turner, Computer ScienceJerry Glasco, Financial ServicesRob Montry, Student AffairsFawn Skarsten, Institutional AnalysisChris Waters, Undergraduate Studies

Retention goal recommendations

Increase Retention Rates for FTIAC Students:

1st Year Retention Rate: From 72% to 79% by Fall 20202nd Year Retention Rate: From 66% to 70% by Fall 2020Increase 1st

Year Retention Rate for Transfer Students (Overall): From 76%

to 80% by Fall 2020

Increase 1

st

Year Retention Rate for Transfer Students with Less

T

han 24 Transfer Credits: From 63% to 70% by Fall 2020

FEEDBACK