Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related ConditionsPsychological Health Training ProgramProgram Evaluation (Summary)

 Instruction Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average 1. The learning objectives were met: A) Identify symptoms of Celiac Disease 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375  B) Identify the psychological challenges 1 2 3 4 5 5 related to Celiac Disease   C) Recognize symptoms indicating need for 1 2 3 4 5 5 mental health services in patients with Celiac Disease 2. Concepts were based on methodological, theoretical, 1 2 3 4 5 5 research, and/or practical knowledge base relevant to psychological practice, education or science 3. Content was appropriate for postdoctoral-level 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 training 4. Teaching methods were effective and appropriate 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 for the subject matter 5. Visual aids, handouts and oral presentations clarified 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 content  Presenter – John Snyder, MD (Overview of Celiac Disease) Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 5 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.4615 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 5 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461  

Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related ConditionsPsychological Health Training ProgramProgram Evaluation

 Presenter 2 – Alexis Resnick (Patient Perspective)

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 4.8667 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 4.7333 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 4.8 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.8 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.8571 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.7857  Presenter – Eleanor Mackey, PhD (Psychosocial Impact of Chronic Illness & Fostering Adaptive Coping) Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 5 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.875  

Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related ConditionsPsychological Health Training ProgramProgram Evaluation

 Presenter – Mi-Young Ryee, PhD (Psychological Challenges Related to Celiac Disease in Pediatric Populations )

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average 6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 5 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 5 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 5 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 5 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.9375  Presenter – Venkatesh Handratta, MD (Psychiatric Manifestations of Celiac Disease in Adult Populations) Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 4.9333 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 4.6 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 4.6 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.4 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.7333 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.6667   

Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related ConditionsPsychological Health Training ProgramProgram Evaluation

 Presenter – Shayna Skelley Coburn,

PhD (Case Examples with Panel Discussion Panelists – Venkatesh Handratta, MD, Eleanor Mackey, PhD, Mi-Young Ryee, PhD, Vanessa Weisbrod, BA Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 5 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 4.9333 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 5 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.9333 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.9333 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.8667  Presenter – Laura Hashiguchi, RD, LD/LDN and Vanessa Weisbrod, BA (The Gluten-Free Diet and Exploration of Gluten-Free Foods) Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 5 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.7692 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461   

Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related ConditionsPsychological Health Training ProgramProgram Evaluation

 Presenter – Vanessa Weisbrod, BA (Connecting Patients to Community Resources)

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average 6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461  Presenter – Mi-Young Ryee, PhD (Review of Psychological Health Training Manual andPractical Applications) Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average6. Knew the subject matter well 1 2 3 4 5 5 7. Taught the subject matter completely 1 2 3 4 5 5 8. Presented program content effectively and in 1 2 3 4 5 5 an organized manner 9. Maintained my interest 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461 10. Responded well to questions, comments, and 1 2 3 4 5 4.9231 opinions 11. Participant/presenter interaction was adequate 1 2 3 4 5 4.8461   

Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related ConditionsPsychological Health Training ProgramProgram Evaluation

 Facility Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Average

 12. Facility was adequate for my needs 1 2 3 4 5 5 13. Special needs were met 1 2 3 4 5 5 14. Food and beverage were adequate 1 2 3 4 5 5  Professional Issues15. This program enhanced my   professional expertise _x (all)__Substantially ___Somewhat ___Not at all 16. I would recommend this program to others _x (all)__Yes ___No ___Not sure Comments/Program Improvements17. General Comments:  Great job!! Comprehensive presentation Very informative program. Appreciated the range of professionals presenting and the inclusion of patient/family perspective. Thank you! Needs to be spread out to the off center primary care sites. Needs to be offered to staff throughout. I loved this!! An excellent information packed day. Well done! This was so informative & helpful. Thank you! Excellent info - appreciate medical background Great training - I learned a lot and will distribute materials/resources to families and patients This program was very well organized and implemented. I enjoyed it!! 18. What suggestions do you have for improving the education program: Would highly recommend some version of this program be presented to the numerous primary care providers at Children's (i.e., primary care clinics & Children's Pediatrics & More time for he Q&A (extend to 30 minutes?) Do it again! I'm not entirely sure that a psychiatrist's inclusion was necessary. There was a lot of overlap between his presentation and the other presentations - perhaps a clarification of what each mental health professional should present to reduce overlap would have helped. I also would recommend

including breaks in the schedule. It was fatiguing to attend the sessions back-to-back. Breaks

would also have allowed me to network a bit and meet the other people

in the

room - and hopefully

build

some

connections

with other providers with similar interests.