PPT-Facilitating Discourse Analysis with Interactive Visualizat

Wei Guo Overview Background Discourse Parser Discourse Analysis Existing Visualization Methods DAViewer Interface Methodology Use case scenarios Background discourse parser a natural language processing system which can represent the organization of a document . By sep arating speci64257cation from execution declarative languages can simplify development enable unobtrusive optimization and sup port retargeting across platforms We describe the design of the Protovis speci64257cation language and its implemen John M. Swales. jmswales@umich.edu. The Colonic Title. . THEME .  DEVELOPMENT. . TOPIC  COMMENT. . THEORY  APPLICATION. . AIM  METHOD. . GENERAL  SPECIFIC. SENSE  NONSENSE. How consent is made. On communicative ethics. On . communicative ethics. In this model, ethics are in . practices,. not in . people.. We’d ask, are our interactions more or less reciprocal and is it possible to challenge existing theories and assumptions?. Julia Hirschberg. CS 4705. Thanks to Dan Jurafsky, Diane Litman, Andy Kehler, Jim Martin . What makes a text or dialogue coherent? . “Consider, for example, the difference between passages (18.71) and (18.72). Almost certainly not. The reason is that these utterances, when juxtaposed, will not exhibit coherence. Do you have a discourse? Assume that you have collected an arbitrary set of well-formed and independently interpretable utterances, for instance, by randomly selecting one sentence from each of the previous chapters of this book.” . An Overview. Reflect on our class so far…. What is the most . important or most useful . thing you’ve learned about who you are as a . reader, as a writer, and as . astudent. ?. What kinds of connections can you make . Discourse, genre and discourse type. Definitions of discourse. The literature provides . many different . definitions of “discourse” (see . Jaworski. and . Coupland. 1-37 for an overview). In reality they have more overlap than would appear at first sight.. . L. earning . Teams. Learners will be able to…. Learning objectives. Understand the responsibilities and skills needed by facilitators and other roles that contribute to a team’s success.. Acquire skills and strategies for facilitating learning teams, such as forming agreements, using purpose and . ’. The. . limits. of . my. . world. . are. . the. . limits. . of. . my. . language. ’ (Ludwig . Witgenstein. ). Other senses of ‘discourse’. Descartes: . Discourse. . on. . Method. Walter . Humes. University of Stirling. Four Challenges. Political. Philosophical. Pedagogical. Professional. Discourse Analysis. Where has the discourse come from?. Why has it come to prominence now?. Free . Write. Look out on the . UCWbL. physical space or think . about the . UCWbL’s. physical spaces. . . What comes to mind; what do you think of/about?. What . feelings do you have? . Describe . and . M.Spyridakis. , . Spetses. , June 2017 . Discourse . is no longer or solely either the study of linguistic forms or the study of language use.. Discourse . is . rather viewed . as a social . practice referring either to spoken or to written contexts.. The Next Generation. Rashmi. Prasad, Bonnie . W. ebber, . A. lan Lee. *. Aravind. Joshi. Outline. Introduction. Discourse Coherence and its annotation. PDTB Basics. PDTB enrichment. Motivation. New relations. Workshop on Discourse Functions of Demonstratives University of Oslo 14 - 15 June 2018 Åshild Næss Anna Margetts Yvonne Treis Jozina Vander Klok 1 Small programme change : dinner tomorrow continuous stretch of language larger than . a sentence. , often constituting a coherent unit. , such . as sermon, argument, joke or narrative. .”. (. Crystal:1992). “stretches . of language perceived to be meaningful, .