FALL 2017 Jake Hillyard Clinical Details and Patient Intro Clinical experience at a local Acute Care Hospital spending majority of time on Cancer treatment and Pediatric units 15 yr old male ID: 653716
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Clinical Problem Solving II: Case Presen..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Clinical Problem Solving II: Case Presentation FALL 2017
Jake HillyardSlide2
Clinical Details and Patient IntroClinical experience at a local Acute Care Hospital spending majority of time on Cancer treatment and Pediatric units
15 yr. old male
S
coliosis secondary to Friedrich’s ataxia
Reason for Admission: Posterior Spinal Fusion performed to correct scoliosis (T2-L4)Slide3
Friedrich’s Ataxia
Inherited non-congenital autosomal recessive (FXN gene)
Mutated gene inhibits creation of protein
frataxin
Frataxin helps transport iron and is crucial to mitochondria functionSpecific spinal nerve cell degeneration- primary cause of noticeable symptoms“GAA” repeats in DNA sequence (966-699)Curefa.orgSlide4
Friedrich’s Ataxia cntd.
3 Major manifestations
: Scoliosis(Y), Hypertrophic Cardio Myopathy(N), Diabetes(N)
Most commonly diagnosed between 5-18 yrs. Late onset less common
Common signs and symptoms:
Impaired coordination, fatigue, diminished wound healing, vision impairment, hearing impairment, slurred speechMental capacity remains intact
Most early diagnoses result in mobility aids such as walker or wheelchair by late teens to early twenties.
Curefa.orgSlide5
Initial Evaluation post op day 1
Subjective Findings:
Prior level of function: Independent with frequent falls
“Walks like a drunken sailor” –per mom
Home situation:
2- story private residence5 steps to enterLives with mom and siblings
No current DME used
“I can’t do this” at initiation of movement
Pain: 10/10 – rib cage, constantSlide6
Initial Evaluation post op day 1 cont’d.
Objective Findings:
ROM: Generally decreased, functional
Strength: Generally decreased, functional
Tone: Abnormal- increasedSensation: IntactCoordination: Markedly decreased
Bed Mobility:
Rolling- Max assist
Supine to Sit- Max assist
Scooting- Max assist
Transfers:
Sit to Stand: Mod assist
Stand to sit: Min assist
Stand Pivot: Assist x2
Gait:
5 feet to chair- assist x2
Widened stance, valgus knees, ataxicSlide7
ICF Model
Impairments
Pain
Increased tone
Decreased coordination
Decreased strengthDecreased motor controlImpaired balance
Activity Limitations
Abnormal gait due to pain and ataxia
Difficulty transferring
Difficulty with bed mobility
Participation Restrictions
Difficulty with mobility at school
Altered social life
Dependent on others for transportationSlide8
Treatment PlanBed Mobility
Transfer training
Gait training
Endurance
Patient/Family Education
Back precautionsHome management
Activity pacingSlide9
Treatment GoalsWithin 4 days, patient will be able to:
Move from supine to sit and sit to supine with min assist
Perform sit to stand with supervision/set-up
Ascend/descend 5 stairs with 1 handrail with min assist
Verbalize and demonstrate back precautions accuratelySlide10
Treatment post op day 1 p.m. sessionGait Training: Ambulated 15 ft. with two-hand hold mod assist in front with stand by assist from behind.
Mod assist with sit to supine
Complained of nausea and pain 7/10Slide11
Treatment post op day 5Ambulated 50 ft. (10, 10, 30) with mom providing two-hand grasp from front
Ascended/Descended 3 stairs with min assist x1
Bed Mobility with mom provided assistance:
Supine to sit- mod assist
Sit to supine – stand-by assist
Scooting – stand-by assistSlide12
Clinical QuestionFor a
15 year old male patient with Friedreich’s Ataxia, would motor training and coordination exercises performed post-operatively improve functionality and gait following a posterior spinal fusion?
Hypothesis: Yes, I believe that motor training and coordination exercises following a posterior spinal fusion will improve my patient’s functionality and gait as his body adjusts to it’s new anatomical alignment.Slide13
Systematic Review
Motor Training in Degenerative Spinocerebellar Disease:
Ataxic-Specific Improvements by Intensive Physiotherapy and
Exergames
Synofzik
, M. Winfried, I.Published in BioMed Research International2014. Vol. 2014. Article ID 583507Slide14
Inclusion Methods
Time Period of January 1, 1980 – December 18, 2013
Articles were included if they met the following criteria:
Original report
Prospective clinical trial examining physiotherapy interventions
High-intensity training over an extended period of timeControl designPatients with spinocerebellar degeneration (not secondary)
Originally n = 578, only 3 met criteriaSlide15
Article #1
Cerebellar Ataxia Rehabilitation Trial in
Degenerative Cerebellar Diseases
Ichiro, M.
Mizuki
, I. et al.Published in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair2012. Vol. 26 (515-522)Slide16
Study Details
Design
Randomized Controlled Trial and Observational Study
2
Intervention groups- immediate and delayed
All participants received same intervention for 4 weeks- PT focused on improving balance and gait1 hr of PT + 1
hr
of OT on weekdays, 1
hr of either on
weekends
Data collected at 0, 4, 12, and 24
wks
after intervention
.
Participants
N = 42 (21 in each group)
Mean age 62.5
Outcome Measures
SARA- Scale for the Assessment and Rating of
Ataxia (0-40)
FIM
Also gait speed, falls, cadence, FACSlide17
Results- Short term (RCT)Slide18
Results – Long TermSlide19
Conclusion/Limitations
Intensive rehabilitation interventions showed significant improvements in SARA scores, gait speed, FIM, and fall frequency in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia in the
short term
. Unfortunately when the therapy was discontinued, these gains were lost as outcomes mostly returned to their pre-intervention levels.
Limitations
Lack of specificity in type of cerebellar ataxia (afferent or cerebellar)Age Average!
No video examination to ensure complete blinding
High number of interventions
Increased motivation in weeks post-intervention?Slide20
Article #2
Video
g
ame-based coordinative training improves
a
taxia in children with degenerative ataxiaIlg, W. Schatton, C. Schicks, J. Giese, M. Schols
, L.
Synofzik
, M.
Published in Neurology
2012 : 2056-2060
Class III evidenceSlide21
Study Details
Design
Prospective Cohort Study
8
wks
coordinative training on Microsoft XBOX Kinect (2 wks in lab, 6 wks at home)Assessments performed at 4 intervals, E1-E4.
2 weeks prior
Immediately prior
After 2 week lab training
After 6 weeks home training
Patient’s acted as own control
Participants
N = 10
Mean Age: 15.4
4/10 had FA
Outcome Measures
SARA
DGI
ABC
Slide22
Study Details cntd.
XBOX Kinect Training
Table Tennis
Light Race
20,000 Leaks
Movement Goals
Goal directed limb movements
Dynamic balance
Whole-body coordination
Rapid reactions
Recalibrate movement predictions
4 -1 hour training sessions/
wk
Data gathered via VICON MX motion capture system for movement analysisSlide23
Results
- Children with FASlide24
Results cntd.Slide25
Conclusions/Limitations
Children with degenerative ataxia were shown to make improvements in dynamic balance activities such as gait as evidenced by improved SARA scores, DGI, and quantitative movement analysis. Video game-based coordinative training provided a fun, inexpensive, and motivating method for potential long term retention of measured gains.
Limitations
Small sample size
Varying ataxia subsets (afferent vs cerebellar)
Potential practice bias between E1-E2
Subjectivity of practice effort at homeSlide26
Final ConclusionsFor a 15 year old male patient with Friedreich’s Ataxia, would motor training and coordination exercises performed post-operatively improve functionality and gait following a posterior spinal fusion
?
Yes, I do believe that coordination/motor-control based rehabilitation would be beneficial for my patient. Although the evidence showed limited effect on gait, overall functionality was improved if the interventions were sustained for an extended period of time.
If I were to treat a patient similar to this in the future, I would not hesitate to initiate balance and coordination training in addition to motor control activities post surgery.Slide27
References
Synofzik
, M., &
Ilg
, W. (2014). Motor Training in Degenerative Spinocerebellar
Disease: Ataxia-Specific Improvements by Intensive Physiotherapy and Exergames. BioMed Research International, 2014, 1-11. doi:10.1155/2014/583507
Miyai
, I., Ito, M., Hattori, N.,
Mihara, M.,
Hatakenaka
, M.,
Yagura
, H., . . .
Nishizawa
, M. (2011). Cerebellar Ataxia Rehabilitation Trial in
Degenerative
Cerebellar Diseases.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural
Repair,26
(5
), 515-522.
doi:10.1177/1545968311425918
Ilg
W,
Schatton
C,
Schicks
J, et al. Video game-based coordinative training
improves
ataxia in children with degenerative ataxia. Neurology.
2012;79:2056–60
.Slide28
Questions?