COP20 Lima PURPOSE To provide a report on the outcomes of UNFCCC COP 20 CMP 10 that took place in Lima Peru in December 2014 1 COMPETING ARCHITECHTURE PARADIGMS IN GLOBAL NEGOTIATIONS A bottomup style driven by a pledge and review ID: 616874
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Report from UNFCCC" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Report from UNFCCC COP20, Lima
PURPOSETo provide a report on the outcomes of UNFCCC COP 20/ CMP 10, that took place in Lima, Peru, in December 2014
1Slide2
COMPETING ARCHITECHTURE PARADIGMS IN GLOBAL NEGOTIATIONS
A bottom-up style driven by a pledge and review
system
Unilateral
and self-determined pledged domestic targets, policies and measures
Domestically legal
commitments
Domestically determined rules and criteriaAmbition is informed by national priorities and circumstances“Internationalised” through reporting and review procedures
A top-down Kyoto-style agreement driven by the requirements of science
Multilateral commitments, with inclusive and equitable participation Internationally legally binding on all PartiesCommon multilaterally agreed rules and criteriaLevel of ambition is informed by science (but also accounting for national circumstance and priorities)
CONFIDENTIAL
2Slide3
COP 17, Durban Outcomes, 2011
Provided an historic opportunity for reconciling the 2 competing paradigms, with participation of all countries
Durban Platform agreement to:
conclude the negotiation of a future global legal agreement by 2015, applicable to all, coming into effect by 2020, covering mitigation, adaptation, means of implementation and transparency requirements
Increase level of ambition pre 2020Agreement on 2nd Commitment Period of Kyoto ProtocolDurban COP 17/ CMP 7 - 2011Slide4
Progress Towards Paris 2015
4Slide5
KEY ISSUES IN Lima COP 20- CMP 10
Elements and legal form of the new multilateral legal agreement, to be concluded by 2015 in Paris, COP 21;
Process and minimum information requirements for Parties’ Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs);
Giving effect to the principle of common but differentiated responsibility and equity; and
Dealing with urgency, and operationalising the international mechanisms, such as the Green Climate Fund;
5
UNFCCC NEGOTIATIONSSlide6
SA POSITION – 2015 new legal agreement
Reinforce
multilateral rules
based system of the UN;Implement and contribute to the fulfillment of the
objective of the Convention as set out in Article 2; Be inclusive (applicable to all Parties); fair (give effect to the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities); effective (be based on sound science); Be
adequate (to keep temperature increase below 2°C);Enable and enhance the transition to a low emissions and climate resilient sustainable development pathway;
Give equal priority to adaptation and mitigation with balanced provision of means of implementation.
6
SA expectations of the 2015 agreement:Slide7
SA POSITION FOR LIMA
[1] South Africa’s position with regard to the INDC process
was
that:
Parties’ INDCs must cover the full scope of issues of the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action, i.e. mitigation, adaptation and the provision of finance, technology and capacity-building support.A formal process must be agreed on for the communication of INDCs to all Parties.In keeping with a transparent and fair multilateral process under the UNFCCC, this information must be multilaterally agreed and applied, rather than being determined domestically. This information must facilitate clarity, transparency and understanding of a Party’s intended national contribution.
Elements
and legal form of the new agreement:Lima needed to finalise the elements of the new agreement.
The agreement must reflect all elements, i.e., Mitigation, Adaptation, Finance, Technology development and transfer, capacity building and transparency issues. 7Slide8
SA POSITION FOR LIMA
[2]
Common but differentiated responsibility and equity
South Africa’s view is that
equity and appropriate differentiation can be more meaningfully advanced by following the structure of the Convention for the formulation of individual commitments.Article 4(1) of the Convention provides the framework for commitments for all Parties.Article 4(2) onwards creates the framework for additional commitments for developed country Parties.
Dealing with urgency and making the system operational now:
Progress towards mobilizing 100 billion USDAdaptation FinanceTechnology transfer to support implementation
Institutional arrangements for Loss and damage8Slide9
KEY OUTCOMES
[1]
After
running into overtime
the conference concluded successfully with the Lima call for climate action.The Outcomes reflect three of the 5 Key political issues:an agreement to maintain differentiation and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities; an agreement to do a synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDCs) - offers expected from each party in 2015 for the new post 2020 climate regime); and
that the scope of the INDCs will include both mitigation and adaptation.
Paris COP 21 will have to concluded the following two political issues:Cycle of contributions / length of the commitment period; and
The legal form of the post 2020 agreement.9Slide10
KEY OUTCOMES
[2]
The
Conference addressed the current inadequate level of ambition
by outlined steps that will be undertaken through the technical expert meetings that are tasked with identifying scalable actions in the post-2012 and pre-2020 period. these actions must include adaptation, health and sustainable development co-benefits. urged all parties to finalise the ratification processes of the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol that was agreed to in Durban.
Dealing with urgency, and operationalising the mechanisms:
Mobilised over USD 10 billion for the Green Climate FundAgreed to continue discussion on identifying the sources and scale of long-term climate finance.Launched a two year work plan aimed at promoting gender balance within the UNFCCC
Adopted a declaration on Education and awareness-raising.10Slide11
POLITICAL
DYNAMICS[1]
Negotiations
under UNFCCC towards the adoption of a new legal instrument in December 2015, should be seen in a wider global political debate over differentiation of responsibilities in international
relations.Middle income and key emerging countries are expected to assume greater responsibility.Developed countries refuse the retention of existing binary division in UNFCCC between developed and developing countries.Attempts to re-classify countries pose a challenge to traditional regional groupings, North-South configuration and political alliances.Negotiating context highly complex characterised by the fragmentation of the United Nations membership into a multitude of groupings and alliances with overlapping memberships.SA is the Chair of the G77 and China in 2015.
2015 is also a crucial year for Africa - co-Chair of the
ADP discussions (Algeria). Unity of the G77 & China as well as Africa group that South Africa engage as part of will be crucial.
11Slide12
POLITICAL
DYNAMICS[1]
BASIC (Brazil, India, South Africa and China) functions as an informal political discussion group and not as a negotiating group.
China is exerting strong pressure on the other BASIC countries to increase coordination and develop common positions.
This is particularly problematic for South Africa and Brazil, which unlike India and China, are not members of the group of Like-Minded Developing Countries (LMDCs) that are most reluctant to take on new commitments in the UNFCCC context. China also tends to use BASIC as a platform to demonstrate ‘transparency’ vis-a-vis fellow emerging economies by reporting on its bilateral undertakings with major economies - and in particular the USA - at a time when there are concerns amongst many countries that the 2015 agreement may be pre-determined by the political arrangement that was announced between China and the USA in 2014
CONFIDENTIAL
12Slide13
POLITICAL
DYNAMICS[1]
It is worth noting that
the Lima achievement was made through the resolve of the Africa group that refused to accept an outcome that did not address the continent’s needs
.The conference had to go into extra time to resolve issues that the Africa group insisted they need to be resolved. South Africa rallied other BASIC countries (Brazil, India and China) to support the Africa position. This marked a successful achievement by South Africa to use the BASIC countries to support the Africa common position and thus further strengthening South-South cooperation.With South Africa chairing the Group of 77 and China
in 2015, it will therefore rely on and negotiate through the Africa group to advance its national and regional interests
13Slide14
PREPARATORY PROCESS FOR COP 21 / CMP 11 - PARIS
ADP Inter-Session Meeting : 08 -13 February 2015
BASIC
Meeting: 15 – 18 April 2015, Brazil
Informal Ministerial Consultations: May 2015Petersberg Dialogue: 18- 19 May 2015 - Berlin42nd Session UNFCCC SB: 01 – 11 June 2015 – Bonn
ADP Inter-Session Meeting: 31 August – 04 September 2015Pre- COP 21
Meeting: 18-20 October 2015ADP Inter-Session Meeting: 19 – 23 October 2015
Paris COP 21: 30 Nov – 11 December 201514