PPT-Revised Judging Criterion: understanding Livelihoods

REVISED JUDGING CRITERION Which Enactus team most effectively used entrepreneurial action to empower people to improve their livelihoods in an economically socially and environmentally sustainable way. or he ad nc re d en ed es ext Per it ti on as DV CE S ax anc 1000 ep nt of he il be ti ca deduc ed fr he bal be er bu on un pa Power of Attorney forms must be updated at least yearly on de be ch ed a han li ng ee 50 0 ea h ad anc er leas ear ge at f UNB Fredericton. Tuesday 12 May 2015. President Eddy Campbell. Thank You All. Ben . Newling. Michel Couturier . National Judging Committee. Judith . Soon. Jeff . Hoyle. Caroline. Whippey. Patrick. Whippey. A WAY to GIVE BACK. Self-Empowerment. . Joys of Judging. Duty . of a Judge. A . Judge Does NOT . Evaluate the Speakers!. An Evaluator looks for ways to improve the speech. A Judge . PICKS A WINNER!. Framework for Project Interventions. . Livelihoods . . Skill building. Food Security . Assetization and Income Generation. Access to financial services. Fair terms of trade. Social Mobilization. Role of BRLPS. Sankar. . Datta. , Ashok . Sircar. , . Suryamani. . Roul. , Srinivasan, . Manas. . Ratha. , Vijay . Mahajan. Overview. Workforce shifting away from agriculture. NREGS and construction create more jobs – but of low quality. REVISED JUDGING CRITERION. Which Enactus team most effectively used entrepreneurial action to empower people to improve their . livelihoods. in an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable way?. WORLD. 1 Corinthians 5-6. Exton Two Day Study. April 21, 2014. Goals for session. Walk through the text of 1 Cor. 5-6 together . (30 min). Defend the unity of chapters 5-6 and chapters 1-6 . (10 . min). Series on Sermon on the Mount. Matt 7:1-5. Introduction. Relevant. , important & common. Sometimes . misinterpreted & . misapplied. R. elationships . with one another in the . church. Spiritually (faith) . Enactus project process. TAKE ACTION. SEE OPPORTUNITY. ENABLE PROGRESS. PREVIOUS JUDGING CRITERION. Considering the relevant economic, social and environmental factors, which Enactus team most effectively empowered people in need by applying business and economic concepts and an entrepreneurial approach to improve their quality of life and standard of living?. Programme. Evaluators. Jeanne Miranda, Ph.D., UCLA; . Badru. . Bukenya. , Ph.D. . Makerere. University; and Rogers . Kasirye. , M.A. UYDEL. Presentation – Process Evaluation. Intervention – the Youth Livelihoods Program. Explain the importance of animal selection in the success of a production enterprise. Discuss the importance of conformation in animal selection and how it is evaluated through the muscular and skeletal systems. International Awards Judging Tuesday 12 May 2015 UNB Fredericton International Award Judging Typically one or two International projects attend the CWSF. Judged by an Excellence Award judging team in the morning. 2021page 1REVISED 20212021POCI Official Judging Manualpage 2CONTENTSSECTIONPAGESECTION IBY-LAW STATEMENT5SECTION IIMISSION STATEMENT5SECTION IIIMANAGEMENT STATEMENT5SECTION IVADMINISTRATION5SECTION VF Guideline Criterion Referenced Grading GRADEPOINTS very little about what Sources / Articles OConnor K 2002 How to Grade for Learning Glenview IL Pearson Education