PPT-Revised Judging Criterion: understanding Livelihoods

REVISED JUDGING CRITERION Which Enactus team most effectively used entrepreneurial action to empower people to improve their livelihoods in an economically socially and environmentally sustainable way. Speaker’s Development, Week . 7. Karolien . Michiels. Following the Burden. Both sides of a debate can necessarily make good arguments (otherwise the motion is bad). So it is not just about making arguments, it is about making arguments that matter. UNB Fredericton. Tuesday 12 May 2015. President Eddy Campbell. Thank You All. Ben . Newling. Michel Couturier . National Judging Committee. Judith . Soon. Jeff . Hoyle. Caroline. Whippey. Patrick. Whippey. 2014 Mail-in Tournament. Month 2: Swine. Host: . Janell Rice. Animal Science Instructor & Livestock Judging Team Coach. Oregon State University. Before we get started…. Make sure you have a pencil and judging card ready. Framework for Project Interventions. . Livelihoods . . Skill building. Food Security . Assetization and Income Generation. Access to financial services. Fair terms of trade. Social Mobilization. Role of BRLPS. Sankar. . Datta. , Ashok . Sircar. , . Suryamani. . Roul. , Srinivasan, . Manas. . Ratha. , Vijay . Mahajan. Overview. Workforce shifting away from agriculture. NREGS and construction create more jobs – but of low quality. REVISED JUDGING CRITERION. Which Enactus team most effectively used entrepreneurial action to empower people to improve their . livelihoods. in an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable way?. WORLD. 1 Corinthians 5-6. Exton Two Day Study. April 21, 2014. Goals for session. Walk through the text of 1 Cor. 5-6 together . (30 min). Defend the unity of chapters 5-6 and chapters 1-6 . (10 . min). outcomes measurement and reporting. REVISED JUDGING CRITERION. Which Enactus team most effectively used entrepreneurial action to empower people to improve their livelihoods in an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable way?. Enactus project process. TAKE ACTION. SEE OPPORTUNITY. ENABLE PROGRESS. PREVIOUS JUDGING CRITERION. Considering the relevant economic, social and environmental factors, which Enactus team most effectively empowered people in need by applying business and economic concepts and an entrepreneurial approach to improve their quality of life and standard of living?. Background. Nearly half of refugees in world today are caught in protracted situations with b. leak durable solutions. Increase in new conflicts and natural disasters. Humanitarian . imperative to actively seek self-reliance . Good enough for heaven?. Good enough for heaven?. Good enough for heaven?. On . judging. others and being . judged. by God. Romans . 2:1-16. How some judge others: v1-4.. How God judges all: v5-11.. What is the revised judging . c. riterion?. Which Enactus team most effectively used entrepreneurial action to empower people to improve their livelihoods in an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable way?. Aerobatic. Judging. Seminar. CIVA / FAI International. IS IT 45°? LET’S SEE!. How is your attitude?. How is your attitude?. How is your attitude?. Show the ‘Judging Attitudes x8’ PDF. Saving Livelihoods Saves Lives. STRATEGIC RESPONSE TO THE HUMANITARIAN-DEVELOPMENT NEXUS . Dr. . Shukri Ahmed, Deputy Strategic Programme Leader, Resilience FAO. Emergency Aid: Innovative Methodologies and Enhanced Resilience.