/
Cancer Registration in the Era of Genomics: Integrating Germline and Somatic Genetic Data Cancer Registration in the Era of Genomics: Integrating Germline and Somatic Genetic Data

Cancer Registration in the Era of Genomics: Integrating Germline and Somatic Genetic Data - PowerPoint Presentation

SoulfulDreamer
SoulfulDreamer . @SoulfulDreamer
Follow
345 views
Uploaded On 2022-08-01

Cancer Registration in the Era of Genomics: Integrating Germline and Somatic Genetic Data - PPT Presentation

Dr Fiona McRonald 11 th June 2019 NCRAS Public Health England National Disease Registration Service NDRS 2 NAACCRIACR Vancouver 2019 National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service NCRAS ID: 931528

2019 data iacr cancer data 2019 cancer iacr vancouver naaccr genetic variant nhs registration test normal genes mutation molecular

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Cancer Registration in the Era of Genomi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Cancer Registration in the Era of Genomics: Integrating Germline and Somatic Genetic Data into the Cancer Registration System for England.

Dr Fiona McRonald 11th June 2019NCRAS, Public Health England

Slide2

National Disease Registration Service (NDRS)

2

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS)

National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service (NCARDRS)

National Drug Treatment and Monitoring Service (NDTMS)

Genomics Data Programme spans these areas

Population-based registers, covering all NHS activity in England.

Slide3

3

Vision for NCRAS in the Genomic Era

Patient ID and Tumour Data

Germline Mutation Data

Somatic Mutation Data

NEW DATA FEEDS

Radio-therapy

Pathology Reports

PAS

Cancer Waiting Times

Chemo-therapy

Radiology

COSD / MDT

Audit

ONS Deaths

ENCORE Local Feeds (from NHS Trusts)

ENCORE National Feeds

Data Extraction

Integration of genotype and phenotype data

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Precision Oncology

Cancer predisposition

Haematology molecular and cytogenetics Labs

Regional NHS Clinical Genetics Services

Molecular Pathology Labs

Regional NHS Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics Labs

Family history confirmation

NCRAS: National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service

Slide4

4

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Labs supplying somatic data

Birmingham

Bristol

Cambridge

Cardiff

Exeter

Leeds

Liverpool

Manchester

Newcastle (

NewGene

)

Nottingham

Royal Marsden

Sheffield

Molecular section of pathology lab

Regional Molecular Genetics lab

We have ~75-80% of solid tumour data for actionable* genes

The main gap is in London

*Genes for which a licenced targeted therapy is available

Slide5

Genetics Data Schema

5NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Genetic TestDates, method, lab sample number, which lab carried out the test, who ordered it etc.

Genetic Test ResultWhich gene was tested, whether it was normal, type of abnormality found etc.

Genetic Sequence Variant

If a mutation was found in a gene, the exact details of the mutation can be recorded here

One genetic test can look at several genes

One gene can have several variants

Slide6

Standardising and processing molecular data

Data Tables in registry – map each data feed to standard structure

6NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Education and training of registration staff

QA of registration process. SQL code for analysis

Slide7

27976

TUMOURS

TESTED

44193

GENETIC TESTS

70944

GENETIC TEST RESULTS

9

REGISTRATION STAFF

9

LABORATORIES

(Birmingham, Royal Marsden, Leeds, Cambridge, Nottingham, Liverpool, Newcastle, Sheffield, Exeter)

63900

GENES

TESTED

2.3

PER TUMOUR

20

MONTHS

Jan 2016 - Aug 2017

17.4%

ABNORMAL

TEST RESULTS

1145

COMBINATIONS

OF

GENE

AND

TUMOUR

SITE

Slide8

Tumour types and genes tested

8

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Registration

in progress:

2016 data >90% complete

2017 data ~25% complete

15,983

2180

3942

1409

3500

962

Slide9

Lung cancer results – the Big Three

9

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Figures calculated

May

2019

Slide10

Aberration types

10

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Gene

Test status

Genetic aberration type

Tumours tested (all sites; normal and abnormal results only)

EGFR

Normal

Wild type sequence

9411

Abnormal

Mutation (DNA sequence variant)

1234

(11.6%)

ALK

Normal

Not fused or rearranged

8559

Abnormal

Fusion / translocation

202

(2.3%)

PD-L1

Normal

Normal gene expression

3946

Abnormal/Borderline

Overexpression

4792

(54.8%)

MLH1

Normal

Normal gene expression

1372

AbnormalUnderexpression / silencing189(12.1%)

NormalNormal epigenetic status37Abnormal

Promoter methylation37(50%)

Slide11

EGFR mutation spectrum in NSCLC

11

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

mutations conferring sensitivity to 1

st

generation TKIs

mutations conferring resistance to 1

st

generation TKIs

807 sensitivity mutations

164 resistance mutations

We estimate that ~150 of these tumours are double mutants.

Figures calculated November 2018

Response to 1

st

generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g. gefitinib, erlotinib:

Slide12

12

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Germline Data Collections

Pilot Project:

BRCA1

and

BRCA2

genes – Supporting the BRCA Challenge

Data received from

13

labs, covering period from 2000 onwards. Aggregated variant data from >22,000 individuals released back to NHS geneticists (Cancer Variant Interpretation Group,

CanVIG

)

Phase Two: Colorectal cancer predisposition genes (with a focus on Lynch syndrome) – Bowel Cancer UK funded

Data received from five labs so far

Data received

Data submission in progress

Awaiting data

Lab does not test BRCA1/2 genes

Slide13

Diagnostic vs predictive genetic testing

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Diagnostic TestingA genetic test on somebody who has a diseaseConfirms the diagnosis and the genetic basis of the diseaseFor cancer patients, PHE can collect this information under section 251

Predictive TestingA genetic test on somebody who is at risk of inheriting a disease, but is not (yet) symptomaticTells somebody whether they carry the altered genePHE cannot have identifiable information on somebody without cancer

13

Slide14

NHS Number + DOB

Germline variants

Decrypted Demographics

NHS Number

+ DOB

Demographics

Germline variants

Unique key

Unique Pseudo ID

+

Unique

Pseudo ID

+ Encrypted Demographics

Unique

Pseudo ID

+ germline variants

Pseudonymisation

interface

Cryptographic ‘salt’

One-way cryptographic hash function (SHA-256)

Reversible encryption function (AES-256)

Unique Pseudo ID

(for matching)

NHS Genetics Lab

Pseudonymisation

Output Files

PHE Cancer Registry (NCRAS)

Slide15

15

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Example of raw data (Leeds)

Slide16

16

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Restructured data – variant counts

Slide17

BRCA Variant Pathogenicity

17

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

ADD ONE EGG AND THE HAM

Wild type sequence

Most pathogenic BRCA mutations are truncating…

A

DO NEE GGA NDT HEH AM.

Frameshift deletion

ADD ON

C

EEG GAN DTH EHA M..

Frameshift

insertion

ADD ONE EGG

END THE HAM

Nonsense mutation

Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS

/

VoUS

)…

ADD ONE EGG AND THE

J

AM

Normal variant??

ADD ONE EGG AND THE HA

T

Missense mutation??

AAT GAC

GTC TAT ACC GAG GCT GAA TCA

???

Slide18

18

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

Case Study:

BRCA2

c.9302T>G p.(Leu3101Arg)

Confirmed ethnicities in cancer registry.

Breast cancer-prone families: 10/16,600

(NHS labs’ combined counts, submitted to PHE

)

vs. population: 0/63,369 (non-Finnish Europeans in

gnomAD

database)

Fisher exact = 6.48x10

-10

Variant discussed at monthly meeting of Cancer Variant Interpretation Group (

CanVIG), and national evidence assembled.Upgraded from Class 3 (unknown significance) to Class 5 (pathogenic). Families re-contacted.

May 2018: Query from a genetic counsellor:

Variant not seen in population databases

Reported 5 times in

Clinvar

,

as a VUS. 

In silico

prediction: ‘probably damaging’. Changes hydrophobic to charged residue.

Slide19

Confirming family histories for genetic counselling

19

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

New online portal launched 1

st

January 2019

Figures from 1/1/19 – 3/6/19 inclusive:

Total requests processed

7576

Matched

5714 (75.4%)

Unmatched

1750 (23.1%)

Declined

77 (1.0%)

In Progress

35 (0.5%)

i.e. ~1500 requests per month

Slide20

20

NAACCR-IACR, Vancouver, 2019

NHS Regional Genetics & Molecular Pathology Laboratories

Public Health England

Jem Rashbass,

NDR staff (R

egistration

, Analysis and IT D

evelopment

teams)

Health Data Insight CiC

Brian Shand, Nathan Bricault,

Kelvin Hunter, Shilpi Goel, Francesco Santaniello

Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle

John Burn, Gill Borthwick

Cancer Variant Interpretation Group (C-VIG)

Clare Turnbull, Diana Eccles

The BRCA Challenge is supported by a generous grant from Astra Zeneca to the University of Newcastle and Health Data Insight

CiC

.

Funding to support expansion of the project to MMR genes has been provided by Bowel Cancer UK.

This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support

Thanks and Acknowledgements