N dynamics Following Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation ASD J Muramoto 1 C Shennan 1 M Zavatta 1 G Baird 1 ST Koike 2 MP Bolda 2 K Klonsky 3 and M Mazzola 4 1 Department ID: 766235
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "N dynamics Following Anaerobic Soil Disi..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
N dynamics Following Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation (ASD) J . Muramoto 1 , C. Shennan 1 , M. Zavatta 1 , G . Baird 1 , S.T . Koike 2 , M.P. Bolda 2 , K. Klonsky 3 and M. Mazzola 4 1 Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz 2 University of California, Cooperative Extension 3 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis 4 USDA-ARS, Tree Fruit Lab, Wenatchee, WA
Outline ASD Basics and Update Exp. 1: Rotation/mustard seed meal/ASD trials ….organic site and conventional site Exp. 2: ASD carbon-source trial …..conventional site
ASD Basics Biological alternative to fumigants developed in the Netherlands (Block et al., 2000) and Japan ( Shinmura et al., 2000) Control a range of soilborne diseases and enhance yield in many crops Acid fermentation in anaerobic soil In CA, being optimized for strawberry and cane berries being tested for strawberry nurseries, Brussels sprout, almond, walnuts
ASD Process Incorporate readily available organic matter Provide C source for soil microbes Cover with oxygen impermeable tarp Irrigate to saturate soil then to maintain field capacity Water-filled pore space Create anaerobic conditions and stimulate anaerobic decomposition of incorporated organic material
Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation (ASD) ( Shennan et al., 2007) Broadcast rice bran at 9 tons/acIncorporate branList bedsCover w/ plastic mulchDrip irrigate total 3 -5 ac-inches over 3 wksLeave 3 wks and monitor soil Eh and temp 1 2 3 4 5 6
ASD-Treated Fields in California (Farm Fuel Inc. Personal communication) 80% organic sites 20% conventional sites ~20% of CA organic strawberry acreages ~2.5% of CA total strawberry acreages
Potential Mechanisms Production of organic acids toxic to some pathogens Production of volatiles toxic to some pathogens Reduction of iron and manganese – Fe2+ and Mn2+ toxic to some pathogensShifts in microbial communities to create competition or antagonism that suppress pathogensLack of oxygen, low pH,Combination of the above – all interrelated!How are each of these processes related to suppression of specific pathogens?How are processes affected by C source used, soil moisture and temperature, and initial microbial community?
Summary of Findings to 2014 ~ field trials~ Good yields obtained with 9 t/ac rice bran in field trials averaged 99% (82 – 114%) of fumigant yields in 10 replicated field trials in Watsonville, Castroville, Salinas, Santa Maria, and VenturaGot consistently good V. dahliae suppression; 80 to 100% decrease in # microslerotia in soil, using 9 t/ac rice bran Weed suppression limited in the central coast of CA May not need pre-plant fertilizer with 6-9 t/ac rice bran as C-source, but probably will with lower N sources May provide excess N to strawberries with 9 t/ac rice bran Need to monitor N dynamics!
Randomized block split plot designed field trials with 4 replicates at 2 sites (organic and conventional)Main plot: pre-crop of strawberrybroccoli-strawberry-winter cover crop*-lettuce*cauliflower-strawberry-winter cover crop*-lettuce* fallow -strawberry -winter cover crop*-lettuce* Split plot : soil treatment for strawberries MC ( B. juncea : S. alba = 1:1 weight) 1.5 t/ac ASD w/ rice bran 9 t/ac MC 1.5t/ac + ASD w/ rice bran7.5t/ac untreated check (UTC ) fumigation w/ Pic-clor60** Exp. 1: Rotation/Mustard seed meal/ASD trials ** Conventional only * Organic only
Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Broccoli Cauliflower Fallow Broccoli Cauliflower Fallow Organic site, UCSC Organic farm, Santa Cruz, CA. 5 ms/g soil August 2011 November 2011 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 MC UTC ASD ASD+MC ASD+MC UTC ASD MC
May 2012 Cauliflower Fallow Broccoli ASD Pic-Clor MC ASD+MC UTC Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Conventional site, Salinas, CA. 12 ms/g soil August 2011
Variables Monitored N dynamics Soil nitrate (0-6” depth) Verticillium dahliae Viable microsclerotia in soil (ms/g soil)Wilt score: 1 (healthy) – 8 (dead)Infection rate of strawberry plant (%)Crop yield and biomass
Soil Nitrate Dynamics (Org. 0-15cm) ~6 months
Soil Nitrate Dynamics (Conv. 0-15cm) a aab bc ca ab ab b b a ab ab ab b
Salt Burn Damage at ASD plots (Conv. Jan. 2012) ASD w/ 9t/ac rice bran (N 2%) -> total 360 lbs-N/acMC 1.5t/ac (N 6%) -> total180 lbs-N/acASD w/ 7.5t/ac rice bran + MC 1.5t/ac -> total 480 lbs-N/ac …….plus inorganic N from pre-crop residues!
Wilt Score of Strawberry Plants (Org. ) a ab abb
Organic Strawberry V. dahliae Infection Rate %
Changes in Verticillium dahliae Microsclerotia Number in Topsoil of Organic site. Statistical analysis was performed for log-transformed data. Numbers in the table show the back-transformed populations of viable V. dahliae microsclerotia/gram soil.
Org. Strawberry Marketable Fruit Yield
Org. Strawberry Marketable Fruit Yield N fertility effect V. wilt suppression effect
Main ( P =0.6): n.s.Sub (P=0.01*): UTC MC ASD ASD+MC Pic-ClorMain x Sub (P=0.31): n.s. Conv. Strawberry Marketable Fruit Yield (early to mid season yield)
Org. Romaine Lettuce Marketable Yield
Summary N dynamics: Rice bran provided significant amount of nitrate for ~6 months from ASD treatment Benefitted early growth and yieldExcess N caused salt damage to strawberry plants (esp. Conv. site)Need to reduce N inputs in ASD by using lower-N carbon source or lowering rate of rice bran
Summary (Cont.) V. dahliae suppression: ASD+MC and ASD showed reduction of V. dahliae infection in strawberry plant (Org. site)V. dahliae microsclerotia number in soil was lower at ASD and ASD+MC even after 2 years from treatment
Summary (Cont.) Crop yield: Strawberry’s marketable fruit yield at ASD and ASD+MC was highest in Org. and ASD+MC was comparable to fumigation in Conv. (early-mid season yield) Overall:ASD reduced V. wilt and increased yield but no additive or synergistic effect of MC and/or broccoli rotation was observedYield increase in ASD appears to be caused by a combination of N provision (early season) and disease suppression (late season)
Exp. 2: Carbon source trial (PSI, Watsonville) Rhizoctonia-infested field RB split plot. 4 reps Main plots: ASD RB 9 t/ac ASD RB 6 t/acASD ground dry grape pomace (GP) 9 t/acMethyl bromide/chloropicrin UTC Split plots:With and with pre-plant fertilizer (PPF. 650 lb/ac of 6-month slow-release 18-6-12)In-season fertilizer (all plots) March-Aug. 45-19-51 lbs/ac Bed top application! Albion plants
Ground Dry Grape Pomace (grape skin + seeds) Rice Bran N:2.1%, C:49%, C/N:23N:2.3%, C:41%, C/N:18
Disease suppression effect PPF effect
~5-6 months
Summary ASD with rice bran 6 t/ac worked well without sacrificing fruit yield and having excess soil inorganic N 2. Ground dry grape pomace 9 t/ac worked but only with pre-plant fertilizerPre-plant fertilizer was not necessary when rice bran 6 to 9 tons/ac was usedAll above have to be examined in flat rice bran application/incorporation systemsNH4-N dominates immediately after ASD, then gradually nitrified~40 mg/kg of soil inorganic N (0”-6” depth) until April to May was sufficient to achieve the highest yield
ASD: On-going Studies/Challenges Controlling emerging diseases caused by Fusarium oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseolinaReducing N input from C-sourcesCover crop + Low rate of rice branRevisit molasses mixesEvaluating environmental impactsGreenhouse gas emission, nitrate leaching, phosphorus accumulationIneffective in heavy soils?Large clods in beds prevent development of anaerobic conditionUnderstanding biological mechanisms Changes in functional diversity of soil microorganisms?
Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge funding for this work from the following: USDA NIFA MBTP Award # 2012-51102-20294 USDA WSARE Award # SW11-116Organic Farming Research FoundationAnd the many growers, extension and industry people who have made this work possibleGary Tanimura, Glenn Noma, Tanimura and Antle Fresh Foods Inc.Liz Mirazzo, Andy Webster of CASFS, UCSCLuis Rodriguez, Patti Wallace, Mike nelson, Plant Science inc.K. Kammeijer, L. Murphy, P. Ayala, UCCELab assistants, interns, and volunteers of the Shennan lab, UCSC
Questions? joji@ucsc.edu