PPT-Rigor and Relevance Framework

To Examine Curriculum Instruction and Assessment 21 st Century Skills for Success Strong Academics Reading Writing Math Science Career Skills Workplace Attitudes amp Ethics Technology Skills. Dacia Toll, Co-CEO, AF. National Charter Schools Conference. June 20, 2012 . Whose School Is It?. Whose School Is It?. It’s Our School!. Not my school!. Not your school!. It’s our school. It’s our place. . Clickthroughs. for News Search. Hongning. Wang. +. , . Anlei. Dong. *. , . Lihong. Li. *. , Yi Chang. *. , . Evgeniy. . Gabrilovich. *. +. CS@UIUC . *. Yahoo! Labs. Relevance . v.s. . Freshness. Dr. Linda Wallinger. Assistant Superintendent for Instruction. Virginia Department of Education. July 1, 2012. What is “Rigor”?. Is it: . Having a high failure rate in your class?. Issuing zeroes for incomplete work?. vs.. Weak Induction. Homework. Study Fallacies 1-18. Review pp. 103-132. Fallacies (definition § 4.1). § 4.2 Fallacies of Relevance (1 – 8). § 4.3 Fallacies of Weak Induction (9 – 14). For Next Class: pp. 139-152. Renee’ Yates. Renee.yates2@education.ky.gov. www.reneeyates2math.com. . 1. Targets… I can…. Recognize and experience rigor in a math classroom - do a little math. Ask different questions when visiting classrooms. Mills Kelly. George Mason University. tkelly7@gmu.edu. What Are We Going to Do Today?. Think about thinking like a historian. Watch some people think like a historian. Try to arrive at some partial agreement about what we think historical thinking is and how we can recognize it when we see it. J. Max Wawrik. Nancy Rosado Colon. Law 16. Spring 2017. Law of Evidence. . . Key Terms. Adversary System (U.S.). A system of justice where the parties work in opposition to each . other, and each party tries to win a favorable result for itself. The . And. Problem solving skills. By. Ted McCain. Facilitator: Marlene Wilkinson. Teaching for Tomorrow. Goal. : To Support Problem Solving in Quadrant D. Objectives . (Secondary):. I can…. explain how Bloom’s Taxonomy has changed and why.. Paul N. Bennett, Microsoft Research. Joint with. Ece Kamar, Microsoft Research. Gabriella Kazai, Microsoft Research Cambridge. Motivation for Consensus Task. Recover actual . relevance of . a topic-document . september. 22, . 2017. Patricia Valdez, . p. h. d. Nih. extramural research integrity officer. 2. Nature. , 25 May 2016. The Reproducibility Challenge. Noted by research community; in multiple publications. 2018. Chap. 2 -- Relevance. 2. DIRECT vs. CIRCUMSTANTIAL: DOES IT MATTER ??. DIRECT. . EYEWITNESS TO A FACT IN ISSUE. CIRCUMSTANTIAL. EVERYTHING ELSE . Chap. 2 -- Relevance. 3. WHICH IS MORE PERSUASIVE?. Clickthroughs. for News Search. Hongning. Wang. . , . Anlei. Dong. *. , . Lihong. Li. *. , Yi Chang. *. , . Evgeniy. . Gabrilovich. *. . CS@UIUC . *. Yahoo! Labs. Relevance . v.s. . Freshness. Chapter 1: The Case for Rigor. Barbara R. Blackburn. Definition of Rigor. . . rig·or.  (. rgr. ) . n. .. . 1. Strictness or severity, . as in temperament, action, or judgment.. 2. . A harsh or trying circumstance; . Tom Burton-West. Information Retrieval Programmer. Digital Library Production Service. University of Michigan Library. www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search. Code4lib . February 12, 2013. w. www.hathitrust.org.