Ciceros Lightbulb Change the Audiences Mood Mind or Willingness to Act Fighting vs arguing There is a big difference between fighting and arguing The goal of a fight is to win It ends with one person vanquished and one victorious ID: 583008
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Set Your Goals" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Set Your Goals
Cicero’s Lightbulb—
Change the Audience’s Mood, Mind, or Willingness to Act.Slide2
Fighting vs. arguing…-There is a big difference between “fighting” and “arguing.”-The goal of a fight is to win. It ends with one person vanquished and one victorious.-The goals of an argument is to “win over” your opponent. The endgame is to get your desired result and leave everyone happy.-Oftentimes, it is preferable to “argue” than to “fight.”Slide3
Fighting vs. arguing (cont.)…
-It is key to distinguish between an argument and a fight and to consider what you want to get out of the exchange.
-John Gottman’s research at the University of Washington— -Couples who stay married argued as much as those who divorce. -The difference is in how they argued; how they saw the outcome.-You succeed in your argument when you persuade the audience.Slide4
Fighting vs. arguing (cont.)…
-Use to your advantage the common misconception that “fighting” and “arguing” are the same thing…“fighting”.
-Remember…oftentimes you win by “losing”.**Important Term**-eristic—the type of debating that is solely concerned with winning points. Slide5
Fighting vs. arguing (cont.)…
**Important Term**-Concessio—the formal name for concession. Concede your opponent’s point in order to get what you want.Marcus Tullius Cicero—Three Goals for Persuading People
1) Stimulate your audience’s emotions. 2) Change its opinion. 3) Get it to act.Slide6
Three goals for persuasion…
Joke—
A—“How many psychiatrists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?”B—“I don’t know. How many does it take?”A—“First, the bulb has to want to change!”
…or, it can be persuaded to change!Slide7
Three goals for persuasion…
Start by changing its
mood. -Make the bulb feel how scary it is to sit in the dark.Then, change its mind. -Convince the bulb that the answer is to get into the socket.Finally, fill it with the desire to act.
-Show the bulb how easy it is to get into the socket.(Remember…convincing someone to act is the most difficult part!)Slide8
Three goals for persuasion…
“You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.”The third goal—motivating action to either do something or stop doing something—is the greatest challenge.For example, consider “Get Out The Vote” campaigns. -How do they work?
-How successful are they?Slide9
How to win an argument..
Focus on Influencing your opponent…not proving them wrong.
Remember…an argument is two-sided. The way you compose yourself will contribute to the overall outcome.Listen actively…show that you understand your opponent by reiterating a summary of their points. -This will show that you understand their point of view.Slide10
How to win an argument (cont.)…Slide11
How to win an argument (cont.)…
Come in for the attack… Consider Schopenhauer’s 38 Stratagems; or, 38 ways to win an argument.http://www.mnei.nl/schopenhauer/38-stratagems.htmSlide12
How to win an argument….
Schopenhauer claimed that our world is driven by a continually dissatisfied will, continually seeking satisfaction.
Much like in Buddhism, Schopenhauer saw life as suffering; the root of suffering is desire, or will; to escape suffering, the will (or desire) must be extinguished through work and asceticism.Slide13
How to win an argument…
Carry your opponent's proposition beyond its natural limits; exaggerate it. The more general your opponent's statement becomes, the more objections you can find against it. The more restricted and narrow his or her propositions remain, the easier they are to defend by him or her.Slide14
Cont.
-Ignore your opponent's proposition, which was intended to refer to a particular thing. Rather, understand it in some quite different sense, and then refute it. Attack something different than that which was asserted.-When your opponent puts forth a proposition, find it inconsistent with his or her other statements, beliefs, actions, or lack of action.Slide15
Cont.
-Should your opponent expressly challenge you to produce any objection to some definite point in his or her argument, and you have nothing much to say, try to make the argument less specific.-If your opponent has admitted to all or most of your premises, do not ask him or her directly to accept your conclusion. Rather draw the conclusion yourself as if it too had been admitted.Slide16
Cont.
-If your opponent is making a generalization, find an instance to the contrary. Only one valid contradiction is needed to overthrow the opponent's proposition.- If you succeed in making your opponent's opinion, should it prove true, seem distinctly to his or her own interest, the opponent will drop it like a hot potato.Slide17
Questions for Discussion…-Which of Gottman’s points is the most interesting? Why?-What do you think of the reply, “Interesting point. Tell me more.”?-Gottman says science proves that contempt in a relationship it toxic. How do you feel about that?-Does Gottman’s use of scientific facts add to the persuasiveness of his argument? How about his humor?