Psychological Review Cognitive Dissonance: Case Study cognitive disson - PDF document

Psychological Review Cognitive Dissonance: Case Study cognitive dissonance no longer encompass data, and statement. Further, cognitive change theory's motivation cognitive change.) evidence once for dissonance theory dissonance prediction expected exposure disagreeable com- Ewing found audience members been led with their prior opinions were led In the since Ewing's audience members should be via opinion change. should be dissonance arising or other for this analysis in "predicted terrible disasters were seen dissonance. Because, felt personally responsible for "living in which received to the sonance theory. have been, was "When in addition would likely "it is evidence for selective (p. 189). psychological characteristics motivation for dissonance reduction In the discomfort associated consistency between psychological essence was something akin indicated by dissonant relation theory has much As noted earlier, self-concept made important theory in their assumption aroused only when person is responsible dissonance reduction from point may be illustrated involving dissonance initial opinion) for undesired be present when dissonance not, in fact, assert in order to experience dissonance their exact this article). has made this effect is brings about theabsenceof other or could currently active dissonance researchers, Joel Cooper, similarly tion necessary arousal is responsibility-for-undesired-consequences definition playing, originating in by Kelman Festinger and Carlsmith and Hoyt the latter pinpointed as in the THEORETICAL NOTES change is the AB AB consequence Y) and a self-concept cognition, cognition, intelligent] person who does not do such such stupid] things). is possible tion for cognitive theory is from ego Convergent Evolution has shown adapting its be consistent has spawned. revising is a perfect illustration dissonance reduction intended in is excluded in version because those doing sonally responsible earlier ver- data that statement to is scientifically able. Revision, personal responsi- consequences does have changed cognitive changes occurring Indeed, contemporary a person in a routine atmosphere, when he he behaves ego is . . 459, 472, denial or by disguise is is mechanism, the problem still remains as to the source of or reasons for self-deception arises a more experiences occur in either (a) symbolized, ignored because denied symbolization the experience the self. 1951, p. seems nearly which would constricting or disapproved direction. above statements have little direct pertinence original version. Dissonance theory has quoted above from addresses in which each forecast shift in a focus Rogers. Social psy- on the other hand (and after a focus psychology is cognitive dissonance developments such processes for (this is to as the by attribution "self" is principle in 1977; Rogers, Final Observation Original Dissonance 20-year history authors are social psychological convergence with be regarded sonance theory new focus self will strong foundation process is original version effectively been their experiments inadvertently self-protective cognitive in addition dissonance reduc- ego-related cognitive effort been directed instead carefully designed avoid confounding self-esteem processes and must also be relatively small Are these theory has theory and later, research results. have motivated has advanced theoretical advance. writing, dissonance is still inspiring novel empirical findings Zanna, Note present observations theory may theoretical evolution indicates theory tradi- this rapid evolutionary abandoned without Personal communication, sponsibility for aversive events. later: Current Psychology, Austin, Texas, October perception, dissonance, later: Current Austin, Texas, October in contemporary al. (Eds.), Wiley, 1962. Traits as and Social Psychology, integration and "forced compliance" Social Psychology, Duval, S., Academic Press, Social Psychology, Stanford University Cognitive conse- forced compliance. and Social Psychology, R. Human actor and the server: Divergent E. E. Perceiving the causes General Learning, a function Rogers, C. current practice, and theory. Boston: Houghton and the Social Psychology,