/
Nature and Scope of Sexual Nature and Scope of Sexual

Nature and Scope of Sexual - PowerPoint Presentation

celsa-spraggs
celsa-spraggs . @celsa-spraggs
Follow
431 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-05

Nature and Scope of Sexual - PPT Presentation

Offending Randy Shively PhD Director of Research and Clinical Development Alvis Columbus Ohio Sex Offender Characteristics Needy Immature Manipulative Secretive Controlling Domineering ID: 555999

sexual sex offenders risk sex sexual risk offenders offender children offenses poor treatment mental offending child social history victims skills attitudes years

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Nature and Scope of Sexual" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Nature and Scope of Sexual Offending

Randy Shively, Ph.D.

Director of Research and Clinical Development

Alvis, Columbus, OhioSlide2

Sex Offender Characteristics

Needy; Immature

Manipulative; Secretive

Controlling; Domineering

Poor Social Skills; Sexualize RelationshipsSlide3

Sex Offender Characteristics

Shame for Offense; Not want to discuss

Blame others and system for being at AH

Broken family relationships

Violence and Domestic ViolenceSlide4

Sex Offender Characteristics

Poor communication and relationship skills

Very poor self esteem- feels insignificant

Untreated mental health issues

Anger directed at Staff and SystemSlide5

Sex Offender Facts

Percentage of Sex Offenders who will commit another sex offense- 2.7

%

Percentage of Sex Offenders who will commit another crime- 70

%

Percentage of sexual offenses that occur while living in a supervised setting- 60%

NCMEC

, 2013Slide6

It is estimated that 60% of sexual assaults are not reported to the police

Approximately 2/3 of rapes were committed by someone known to the victim

38% of rapists are a friend or acquaintance

28% of rapists are intimate partners.Slide7

Victims of Sex Offenders Incarcerated in Ohio

79% 17 years old or younger

56% 12 years old or younger

87% female

85% knew the offenderSlide8

Misunderstanding of the Issues

Sex Offending is a very misunderstood area for most of the public- it is not often repeated as other crimes;

Many of the sex offender rules do not protect the public- they places barriers for the sex offender

Most sex offenses do not happen with strangers but people well known to the victimsSlide9

Proportionally More Sex Offenses

Higher proportion of sex offenses with DD population among all types of offenses when compared to the non-DD offender population

Why? Why? Why?Slide10

Why more sex offenses?

Fewer dating opportunities

Belief in ID world that those with cognitive delays are asexual

Less tolerance of sexual deviance in community

Poor social skills-poor decision makingSlide11

5 years

10 years

15 years

All sex offenders

14%

20%

24%

Rapists

14%

21%

24%

“Girl Victim” Child Molesters

9%

13%

16%

“Boy Victim” Child Molesters

23%

28%

35%

Over 50 years old at release7%11%12%Under 50 years old at release15%21%26%

Harris and Hanson (2004)Slide12

RNR Model in Corrections-All Offenders

Risk

-

Who

do we need to target for treatment- target moderate to high risk offender

Needs-

What

dynamic life areas relate to recidivism and which can be altered through active programs,

ie

. substance abuse

Responsivity-

How?

Individual differences in clients which need to be considered when presenting programs (

ie

. Motivation, ID, mental health)Slide13

Ohio Risk Assessment System- ORAS

Risk Areas to Recidivate

Family/Marital

Accommodation

Companions

Alcohol/Drug Problems

Emotional/Personal

Antisocial/Criminal Attitudes

Slide14

 

RISK

FACTORS-SEX OFFENDING

Prior sex offenses

Diverse sex crimes

Deviant sexual interest

Sexual preoccupation

Antisocial orientation/psychopathy

Victim characteristics (male, stranger, unrelated)

History of rule violations (non-compliance with supervision, violation of conditional release)

Attitudes tolerant of sex crimes

Emotional identification with children

Conflicts with intimate partners or lack of intimate partner

Psychopathy and deviance combinedSlide15

Non-DD Sex Offenders - Typology

Rapists/Violence

Pedophiles/Child Victims

Immature/Date Rape

Pornography Violations-importuning/downloading underageSlide16

DD Sex Offenders in Treatment

Underage victims- Pedophilia and poor discrimination of age

Impulsive in general- violate rules and people impulsively

Anger/control/rape- retaliation or control of others drives their offending

Pornography- internet violationsSlide17

There are no pure categories within sexual offending categories alone.

Colorado study:

25.7% assaulted both genders

50% crossed over juvenile/adult

CROSSOVERSlide18

Subtypes of Paraphilias

Exhibitionism

Fetishism

Froteurism

Pedophilia

Sexual Sadism/ Masochism

VoyeurismSlide19

Deviance or Disability?

Are the behaviors being assess representative of a sexual pathology (paraphilia) or are they symptomatic of environmental factors and/or poor understanding of sexual situations and social consequences?

Labeling someone sexually deviant can be a life sentence!Slide20

Assessing Paraphilias: Questions

Is the behavior (problems) part of a preferred sexual pattern?

Are the behaviors present when there is no active mental health disorder?

Is the behavior(s) part of a recurrent pattern?

Was the onset earlier in life?Slide21

ID Specific Risk Areas

ID Specific Risk Factors in Literature:

Lack social skills History of Delinquency

Impulsive Low Self Esteem

Substance Abuse Poor Response to

treatment

Phenix

and

Screenivasan

,2009Slide22

ID Specific Risk Areas

ID Risk Issues:

Psychiatric History Unemployment

Sexual Deviance Antisocial Attitudes

History of Delinquency Susceptible to others influence

Phenix

and

Screenivasan

, 2009Slide23

Coming to Treatment

Usually partial to total denial of sexual offense- roll with resistance (MI model)

Usually referred for treatment out of court mandate or program mandate- forced choice

A lot of thinking errors and social behavior problems related to offenseSlide24

Society Believes Most Sex Offenders are Molesters of Children- Untrue

Small Percentage- 20% or less of DD sex offenders

Pedophiles are not to be trusted around children- they say they can not trust themselves

Need life long accountability and counselingSlide25

There are two basic categories of child molesters:

The first is the

situational molester

whose sexual preference is not solely children.

He perceives himself as entitled to sex and is likely to have a history of varied crimes.

He may abuse other vulnerable populations, e.g., elderly, sick, developmentally disabled.

He frequently offends readily available children to whom he has easy access.Slide26

The second category is the

preferential molester

.

This child molester has definite sexual inclinations toward children, with sexual fantasies and imagery focusing on children.

He has sex with children because of the sexual attraction and arousal.

The problem is not only the nature of the sexual attraction, but also the need to have repeated and frequent sex.

The preferential molester has the potential to abuse large numbers of victims.Slide27

Know Your Client- Best Risk Protection

What motivates him/her?

Do they know they have a problem related to risk?

What are their blind spots?

What are their strengths/needs? How can you build off their strengths?Slide28

Contact Information

Randy Shively, Ph.D.- Alvis

randy.shively@alvis180.org

Slide29

References

Seligman, L. 1998.

Selecting effective treatments: A comprehensive guide to treating mental disorders

.

Jossey

-Bass, Inc.: San Francisco, CA.

Quinsey

, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., and Cormier, C. 1998.

Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk.

American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.

Center for Sex Offender Management. 2000. Myths and facts about sex offenders. (csom.org/pubs/

mythsfacts

)

Harris, J., and Hanson, RK. 2004. Sex offender recidivism: A simple question. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness: Canada.(www.psepc-sppcc.gc.ca)Slide30

References, Cont’d

Heil

, P.,

Ahlmeyer

, S., and Simons, D. 2003. Crossover sexual offenses. A Journal of Research and Treatment,

vol

15(4).

US

Dept

of Justice. Full report of the prevalence, incidence and consequences of violence against women. (ojp.usdoj.gov/

nij

).

Dornin

, C. 2010. Facts and fiction about sex offenders. University of Cincinnati. (corrections.com/news/article/24500-facts-and-fiction-about-sex-offenders).Slide31

References- cont’d

National Association for the Dually Diagnosed. 2007.

Diagnostic manual- intellectual disability: A clinical guide for the diagnosis of mental disorders in persons with intellectual disability

. Kingston, NY

.

Griffiths, D. and

Lunsky

, Y. (2003). Socio-sexual Knowledge and Attitudes Assessment Tool-Revised. Wood Dale, Illinois:

Stoelting

Co.

Boer et al. (2012). Assessment

of Risk and

Manageabilty

of

Individuals

with Developmental and Intellectual Limitations who Sexually Offend (ARMIDILO-S

).