PPT-Teacher and Principal Evaluation Work Session May 9, 2013

Author : harry604 | Published Date : 2024-11-03

Work Session May 9 2013 Can we measure student growth Maryland Tiered Achievement Index Student Learning Objectives TRSG Matrix showing typical objectionable

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Teacher and Principal Evaluation Work Se..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Teacher and Principal Evaluation Work Session May 9, 2013: Transcript


Work Session May 9 2013 Can we measure student growth Maryland Tiered Achievement Index Student Learning Objectives TRSG Matrix showing typical objectionable pattern Although this Transformation Status and Growth weighting. -3-2-10123 -3-2-10123 ************************************************** -0.50.00.5 -0.50.00.5 UrbanPop Scaled -100-50050100150 -100-50050100150 First Principal ComponentSecond Principal Component *** 1. Code of Virginia. § 22.1-294. Principals and assistant principals who have achieved continuing contract status shall be formally evaluated at least once every three years and evaluated informally at least once each year that they are not formally evaluated. Probationary principals and assistant principals shall be evaluated each school year. . Principal Performance Evaluation System. February 2013. Multiple Data Sources. EVIDENCE. Principal Evaluation. Self-Evaluation. Goal Setting. Informal Observations/. Site Visits. Document. Log. Teacher/Staff Surveys. Colleen Conway, University of Michigan. Phillip Hash, Calvin College. Wendee. Wolf-. Schlarf. , Traverse City Public Schools. Introduction. Goals for the Day/Preaching to the Choir. What is unique to Music Teacher Evaluation (MTE)?. Overview (Digging a bit deeper). April 19, 2011. Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning. Session Overview. Part 1: The Basics. Part 2: Challenges. Part . 3: Charting a course. Big Ideas. Change is coming. Presented By Rebecca Crawford and Shane F. Lis. We will begin with a review. Common definitions create a common understanding.. While each individual perceives events, ideas, theories, and practices differently based on previous experiences creating a common definition will allow us to collaborate more effectively . Rose Hermodson. Assistant Commissioner . Minnesota Department of . Education. May 2, 2012 . Teacher Evaluation: Work Plan . education.state.mn.us. Teacher Evaluation. What is it????. What does it look like?. T. eaching and Leading. Office of Evaluation. Division of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness. Summer 2017. Agenda . AchieveNJ: A Tool for Improving Teaching and Leading. Using Accurate Evaluations. to Inform Quality Professional Development. Examples. Note…. In the state examples given the Principal/Asst. Principal is evaluated by the “Superintendent” or “Designee” or a “trained evaluator”.. Illinois. North Carolina. North Carolina cont.. What’s Next for Counselors?. Lois Kappler. Project Manager. Goals for Today. Why are new evaluation systems necessary for educators?. What is MPES?. What is M-STAR?. What does the updated . counselor’s . (. FS. . 1003.32. ) . A TEACHER HAS THE AUTHORITY . to remove from class any student. WHOM . THE . TEACHER. DETERMINES . interferes with the his/her ability to communicate effectively with the rest of the students.. Presented to Towson University Teacher Preparation Faculty. March 25, 2013. FREE. & REDUCED MEALS. Total FARM Students. 1988. 25.63%. MINORITY. Students. 16.3%. Teachers. 5.0%. ENROLLMENT. Total. Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide. Overview. This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals (VPs) in AchieveNJ.. KICKOFF PRESENTATION. March 8, 2013. Presented by:. Joy Forrest (FLC). Jennifer Donnelly (PAE). Rich Pepe (FIS). Presentation Goals. Introduce . Marzano’s. Teacher Evaluation Model. How strategies are organized.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Teacher and Principal Evaluation Work Session May 9, 2013"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents