PDF-Introductionto theNIH Rigor and Reproducibility TrainingModules ...

Potential Discussion Points and Questions Starting Points Concerns are mounting about the current system for ensuring reproducibility in biomedical researchScience is often viewed as 147selfcorre. Thomas Steckler. FORCE2015, Oxford, 12-13 Jan 2015. 2. The Pillars of Good Scientific Practice. Reproducibility. Robustness. Relevance. SCIENCE. 3. Should Scholarly Research Aim . for . Reproducibility or Robustness?. Back to Basics. Judy Hewitt, Ph.D.. On Detail to OER. October 17, 2015. NIH Regional Seminar. Learning Objectives. Describe . the issue of reproducibility and NIH plans to address it. Summarize . changes to application instructions and review criteria for NIH grants. Potential Discussion Points and Questions: Starting Points: Replication: requires a precise process where the exact same findings are reexamined in the same way with identical design, power, subject s Corn and Tomato . National Referee. 2014. Melissa Phillips. Monsanto . Seed Technology Center. Waterman, Illinois. Purpose. The purpose of the referee was to introduce Agar (plant culturing media) as a potential candidate for use in germination testing.. Koi, Tatsumi. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. 1. Overview. There is a reproducibility problem in . G4ionIonisation. P. hysics tables are affected by pre-history. 2. Test bed. Shoot particles into a target. Lessons from the . Madagascar Project. Sergey Fomel. Jackson School of Geosciences. The University of Texas at Austin. ICERM Reproducibility . in Computational and Experimental Mathematics. 12/13/2012. What are the components of core instruction? . From Student Achievement Partners and Achieve the Core. Rigor. “Rigor for the 21. st. century includes a focus on skills for life: critical thinking and problem solving, collaboration and leadership, agility and adaptability, initiative and entrepreneurialism, effective oral and written communication, accessing and analyzing information, and curiosity and imagination.” (Wagner, 2008). Dacia Toll, Co-CEO, AF. National Charter Schools Conference. July 3, 2013. Whose School Is It?. Whose School Is It?. It’s Our School!. Not my school!. Not your school!. It’s our school. It’s our place. . November 2016. Guidelines for Today’s Learning. Be open to and respect all points of view.. Listen with an open mind and expect to learn from one another.. Accept responsibility for active and equitable participation by each group member.. Justin Y. Shi | . shi@temple.edu. Temple University. reproducibility@XSEDE. | An . XSEDE14 . Workshop | July . 14, . 2014 | Atlanta. , GA. Why . Decoupling. can . I. mprove . P. rogram Reproducibility?. back to basics. oct. 27, . 2016. NIH Regional Seminar - Chicago. overview. Why the concern about reproducibility?. The NIH response. Updates to grant applications. Training and Resources. 2. overview. Navigating the University: Research and Resources Management Retreat. August 19, 2016. Michael Jamieson . DRSc. Associate Director, International Center for Regulatory Sciences. Assistant Professor, Clinical Pharmacy. back to basics. October . 26, . 2017. Patricia Valdez, . p. h.. d.. Nih. Extramural Research Integrity Officer. overview. Why the concern about reproducibility?. The NIH response. Updates to grant applications. Matthias Flittner. 1. , Robert Bauer. 1. ,. Amr . Rizk. 2. , . Stefan . Geißler. 3. , . Thomas . Zinner. 3. , . Martina . Zitterbart. 1. 1. Karlsruhe Institute . of. Technology, . 2. Technische . Universität Darmstadt, .