PDF-Introductionto theNIH Rigor and Reproducibility TrainingModules ...

Potential Discussion Points and Questions Starting Points Concerns are mounting about the current system for ensuring reproducibility in biomedical researchScience is often viewed as 147selfcorre. Dr. Linda Wallinger. Assistant Superintendent for Instruction. Virginia Department of Education. July 1, 2012. What is “Rigor”?. Is it: . Having a high failure rate in your class?. Issuing zeroes for incomplete work?. Thomas Steckler. FORCE2015, Oxford, 12-13 Jan 2015. 2. The Pillars of Good Scientific Practice. Reproducibility. Robustness. Relevance. SCIENCE. 3. Should Scholarly Research Aim . for . Reproducibility or Robustness?. Back to Basics. Judy Hewitt, Ph.D.. On Detail to OER. October 17, 2015. NIH Regional Seminar. Learning Objectives. Describe . the issue of reproducibility and NIH plans to address it. Summarize . changes to application instructions and review criteria for NIH grants. Potential Discussion Points and Questions: Starting Points: Replication: requires a precise process where the exact same findings are reexamined in the same way with identical design, power, subject s PhD. On Detail to Office of . Extramural . Research. National Institutes of Health. May 18, 2015. Center for Scientific Review. Advisory Council Meeting. Enhancing Reproducibility . Through Rigor & Transparency. Lessons from the . Madagascar Project. Sergey Fomel. Jackson School of Geosciences. The University of Texas at Austin. ICERM Reproducibility . in Computational and Experimental Mathematics. 12/13/2012. What are the components of core instruction? . From Student Achievement Partners and Achieve the Core. Rigor. “Rigor for the 21. st. century includes a focus on skills for life: critical thinking and problem solving, collaboration and leadership, agility and adaptability, initiative and entrepreneurialism, effective oral and written communication, accessing and analyzing information, and curiosity and imagination.” (Wagner, 2008). Marco . Canini (KAUST) and Jon Crowcroft (. University of Cambridge). What it takes to do reproducible research?. It is actually hard work for both authors and reproducers. Produce solid artifacts. Create, package, share reproducible experiments. september. 22, . 2017. Patricia Valdez, . p. h. d. Nih. extramural research integrity officer. 2. Nature. , 25 May 2016. The Reproducibility Challenge. Noted by research community; in multiple publications. Justin Y. Shi | . shi@temple.edu. Temple University. reproducibility@XSEDE. | An . XSEDE14 . Workshop | July . 14, . 2014 | Atlanta. , GA. Why . Decoupling. can . I. mprove . P. rogram Reproducibility?. back to basics. May 4, 2017. Patricia Valdez, . p. h.. d.. Nih. Extramural Research Integrity Officer. overview. Why the concern about reproducibility?. The NIH response. Updates to grant applications. back to basics. oct. 27, . 2016. NIH Regional Seminar - Chicago. overview. Why the concern about reproducibility?. The NIH response. Updates to grant applications. Training and Resources. 2. overview. back to basics. October . 26, . 2017. Patricia Valdez, . p. h.. d.. Nih. Extramural Research Integrity Officer. overview. Why the concern about reproducibility?. The NIH response. Updates to grant applications. Marco . Canini (KAUST) and Jon Crowcroft (. University of Cambridge). What it takes to do reproducible research?. It is actually hard work for both authors and reproducers. Produce solid artifacts. Create, package, share reproducible experiments.