Sarah Iselin April 10 2015 Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession The Impacts of Successor Type Postsuccession Senior Executive Turnover and Departing CEO Tenure Published August 2002 ID: 415207
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Market Reaction to CEO Succession" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Market Reaction to CEO Succession
Sarah Iselin
April 10, 2015Slide2
Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession: The Impacts of Successor Type,
Postsuccession
Senior Executive Turnover, and Departing CEO Tenure
Published August 2002
Wei Shen, University of Florida and Albert A.
Cannella
, Jr., Texas A&M University
Data:
Publicly traded U.S. corporations
Reporting at least $200 million in sales for 1988
Final sample 228 successions
159 follower successions (Inside executive)
41 contender successions (Inside executive)
28 outsider successions (Outside the firm)Slide3
Hypotheses
Based on three types of successors:
followers, contenders, outsiders
H1
:
Contender successors
will be
positively
associated with
postsuccession
operational performance
H2
:
Outsider successors
will be
negatively
associated with
postsuccession
operational performance
H3:
Senior executive turnover
following a
contender succession
will be
positively
associated with post succession operational
performance
H4: Senior executive turnover following an
outside succession
will be
negatively
associated with post succession operational
performance
.
H5
: There will be an inverted U-shaped relationship between departing CEO tenure and
postsuccession
operational performance.Slide4
Conclusions
Senior executive turnover has a positive impact on firm ROA in contender succession but a negative impact in
outsider succession. Slide5
Stock Market Reactions and Firm Performance Surrounding CEO Succession: Antecedents of Succession and Successor Origin
Published
Spring 2006
Jong C.
Rhim
, University of Southern Indiana, Joy V.
Peluchette
, University of Southern Indiana,
Inam
Song, Daejeon University, South Korea
Data:
800 firms listed with top 800 highly paid CEO’s reported in
Forbes,
1995.
858 CEO successions from 1977 to 1994
CEO succession verified with dates
Firms in utility industry removed from sample (high regulation)
Financial information found in three specific databases
Financial information available for seven years around CEO announcement
CEO demographic information available
Final sample: 211 CEO successions, 40 different industriesSlide6
Hypotheses
H1
: The stock market reacts more favorably to
unanticipated
CEO succession announcements than to
anticipated
CEO succession announcements.
H2
: Favorable stock market reactions to
unanticipated
CEO succession announcements reflect, on average, the improved financial performance of the firm in the
post-succession period
.
H3
: Firms with
insider succession
, on average, financially perform better during the post-succession than the firms with
outsider succession
.
*Three periods range from 60 days before and 59 days after announcement. Announcement period consists of Day 0 and Day 1.Slide7
Conclusions
The average daily abnormal return were 0.3843 percent for the announcement period
0.0040% pre-announcement period
0.0289% post-announcement period
Significant positive abnormal return during the two-day announcement period suggests the stock market reacted favorable to the announcement of CEO.
For 33 successions due to unanticipated events, average daily abnormal return was 0.9241%
Average daily abnormal return for anticipated succession during the same period was 0.2249%
For 71 successions by firms categorized by performing below industry median during prior 3 years, average daily abnormal return was 0.5470%, compared to 0.3027 of “good” performing companies, but was not significant at the 0.05 level, and does not support H2. Slide8
The Market Reaction to the Appointment of an
O
utside CEO: An Empirical Investigation
Published
September 2010
Melita
Charitou
, Andreas
Patis
and
Adamos
Vlittis
, University of Nicosia, Cyprus
Data used
158 U.S. firms
Listed in S&P 500 and S&P
MidCap
400
Appointed outside CEO from 1993-2005
Hypothesis: The
market reactions to the announcement of the outside CEO appointment is expected to be, on average, positive. Slide9
Conclusion
Studied the window of two days before announcement and one day after the announcement.
Results indicated that positive abnormal returns exist around the announcement of an outside CEO appointment.
These announcements of appointments are beneficial to investors. Slide10
RecommendationsSlide11
The Process
Find companies announcing new CEOs
Search Engine: “New CEO”
Wall Street Journal
Bloomberg.com/Leaders
Take long position on companies with CEO announcements
Outside CEO announcements more favorableSlide12
Client Portfolio
Sotheby’s CEO announcement: March 16, 2015
Purchased Sotheby’s Stock on March 16 for $40.96
By March 24, Stock Price: $43.28
Sotheby’s Stock Price Now: $41.50
Shorted Madison Square Garden Company (MSG) for $77.02 a share
March 24: Covered Madison Square Garden for $80.65
MSG CEO Announcement was originally March 1Slide13
Questions and Comments?
Thank you.Slide14
Sources:
Rhim
, Jong C., Joy V.
Peluchette
, and
Inam
Song. "Stock Market Reactions and Firm Performance Surrounding CEO Succession: Antecedents of Succession and Successor Origin."
Mid - American Journal of Business
21.1 (2006): 21-30.
ProQuest.
Web. 3 Apr. 2015
.
Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession: The Impacts of Successor Type,
Postsuccession
Senior Executive Turnover, and Departing CEO
Tenure. Wei
Shen and Albert A.
Cannella
Jr.
The
Academy of Management
Journal
. Vol
. 45, No. 4 (Aug., 2002), pp.
717-733.
The market reaction to the appointment of an outside CEO: An empirical
investigation.
Charitou
,
Melita
;
Patis
, Andreas;
Vlittis
,
Adamos
. Journal of Economics and International Finance2.11 (Nov 2010): 272-277.