Issues Challenges amp Possible Solutions Dr Pankaj Arora Whose Organization was that Your Mine Ours Key words building means a house outhouse stable latrine urinal shed hut wall other than a boundary wall or any other structure whether of masonry bricks wood mud ID: 591085
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Delhi Fire Prevention and Fire Safet..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Delhi Fire Prevention and Fire Safety Act, 1986;Issues, Challenges & Possible Solutions
Dr Pankaj Arora Slide2Slide3
Whose Organization was that?
Your?
Mine?
Ours……Slide4
Key words"building" means a house, outhouse, stable, latrine, urinal, shed hut, wall (other than a boundary wall) or any other structure, whether of masonry, bricks, wood, mud, metal or other material.Slide5
Key words"occupier“ tenant
ownera rent-free tenant of any land or building;
a
licensee
in occupation of any land or building;
any person who is liable to pay to the owner damages for the use and occupation of any land or building.Slide6
Key provisionsInspection of buildings, premises, etc:three hours' notice to the occupier;
if there be no occupier, to the owner; at any time between sunrise and sunset;at any time if it appears to it to be expedient and necessary to do so in order to ensure safety of life and property;
all possible assistance to be provided. Slide7
Key provisionsFollow up:Deficiencies noted.Notice issued to the owner/occupier.
Report sent to Chief Fire Officer.Slide8
Key provisionsPower to seal buildings or premises
Chief Fire Officer.If any building is dangerous to life & property.Can direct local police to help.Slide9
Key provisionsPenaltiesWhoever contravenes any provision of this Act.
imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees,or with both.Slide10
Key provisionswhere the offences is a continuing one, with a further fine which may extend to three thousand rupees for every day after the first during which such offences continues.Slide11
The Haryana Fire Service Act, 2009Slide12
Training of Fire Safety OfficersSlide13
NOCSlide14
Validity of LicenceSlide15
The Delhi Fire Service Act, 2007Slide16Slide17Slide18Slide19
Case StudiesSlide20
Who is covered?Is the Act applicable to all the buildings?
What about the buildings built prior to formulation of this Act in 1986?Slide21
Who is covered?Chief Fire Officer may enter and inspect any building, the construction of which was completed on or before the 6th day of June, 1983 (being the date on which the current building bye-laws had come into force) or any building which was under construction on such date. Slide22
Who is covered?ConsiderationBuilding bye laws at the time of construction.
Minimum standards framed under the Act.May issue notice Slide23
WP(C) No. 2710/1998 decided on 29.5.2003In all high rise buildings in Delhi and New Delhi, fire safety measures to be provided according to bye laws.
Existing but unoccupied buildings and buildings under construction – not to grant occupancy certificate till satisfactory fire safety measures are provided.Slide24
Electricity companies shall not supply essential services to any new high rise building unless and until the building is erected in accordance with law and bye laws. Slide25
Question of LawBSES filed for clarification:Under other laws bound to supply electricity.
Buildings in the “Lal Dora” and “extended Lal Dora areas”. Slide26
Ruling
Irrespective of the applicability of the provisions contained in the NDMC Act or DMC Act or DDA Act or exemption granted under the notification one must provide fire safety measures if the building is of 15 meters height.
Duty of the Chief Fire Officer or nominated authority to inspect the buildings. Slide27
Who is responsible?In case of Hospitals or other such organizations, who is responsible?Director
Medical superintendentFire officerNo one Slide28
Who is responsible?Offences committed by a company
every person in charge of, and responsible to, the company for the conducts of the business of the company, as well as the company, unlessSlide29
such person proves that the offences was committed without his knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offences.Slide30
Who is responsible?
If it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence.Slide31
AMRI caseFire in major Kolkata hospital.More than 90 patients died.Six directors and four hospital administrators arrested.
One of the directors granted bail.Slide32
AMRI case“…..grant him bail because in 2011 he had not attended any board meeting and it shows that he had no direct involvement in the affairs of the hospital."
Interestingly, who is the chairman of the board?Slide33
AMRI caseGovernment of West Bengal has a nominee as Chairman of AMRI hospitals Ltd. Govt. has a 1.75% share in AMRI hospitals.Slide34
Allegation of DelayDelayed call to Fire Office this time.Another fire few months back, call made to fire brigade.
Why?Slide35
Enquiry into origin of fire and report to Magistrate.
senior most officer;ascertain the facts as to the origin and cause; make a report thereon to the Magistrate having jurisdiction;
said Magistrate may summon witnesses and take evidence to further ascertain facts.
Copies of all reports and of all evidence furnished on application to any Fire Assurance company.Slide36
Fire at Rajendra Hospital, Patiala
Fire in Neonatology unit on 31/01/2009.Five Neonates died.Inquiry heldThree officials charge sheeted including two senior officials after 14 months.Slide37Slide38
Three choked to death in ICU fire at KMC Fire in Intensive Medical Care Unit (IMCU) of the Kilpauk Medical College and Hospital (KMCH), Chennai on 23
rd July, 2011.Three fatalities.Cause: Fire in AC.Patients shifted yet causalities.Slide39
Three choke to death in ICU fire at KMCHospital ignored multiple warnings.Inspection – poor maintenance of electric cables and lack of a hose roll system to extinguish fires.
Written communication to the hospital, to upgrade their fire safety measures and look into re-wiring electric cables.Slide40
PGIMERIn the last year, 24 incidents of fire.
In the current year, till now 31 incidents of fire.80% related to electrical problems mostly short circuiting.No casualties
.Slide41
PGIMERNotices have been issued in the
past.Communication
has been
received
from the
MoHFW
.Questions have
been asked in the Parliament.Slide42
PGIMER
Committee to do a Pre Audit formed by MS.Slide43
PGIMERDetailed internal audit of the Institute done.Areas for improvement identified.
Committee made close to 90 observations which included common and specific for different areas. Slide44
P
G
I
M
E
RSlide45
Most of points related to Engineering Services.DPGI directed the Engineering. department to discuss and do needfulPrioritization done.
PGIMERSlide46
Steps being taken to address the issue
P
G
I
M
E
RSlide47
PGIMERSix fire control rooms in Institute.Trained Fire Officer working in the Security department.
Fire escape routes have been cleared.Engineering department has been made accountable.Regular
monitoring
of
progress
as
it may be a
long drawn process.Slide48
PGIMER
A study has been conducted under the guidance of Prof A K Gupta, Prof
Arun
Aggarwal
and Dr Ashok Kumar to understand the awareness regarding the issue at PGIMER.Slide49
Mock drills have been planned and are being conducted.PGIMER
Mock
Drill
Observations
Actions By sister/In charge of the ward
Whether information given to fire control room or not.
Yes
Whether electrical personnel called.
Yes
Whether escape route was opened.
Yes
Action
by fire personnel
Time taken by fire personnel to reach the site.
< 5 minutes.
Whether fire personnel came with basic fire fightingequipments.
Yes
During evacuation whether Fire personnel searched the whole area or not.
Yes
Action
by Security personnel.
Whether security personnel reached at the site timely.
Yes
Were they aware about their duties during the fire fighting and rescue operations.
Yes
Whether the area was cordoned.
YesSlide50Slide51
BUT…….Newer buildings are being planned across the hospitals.But the problem persists.Slide52
PGIMERSimilar problems are also faced at PGI.Attempts
have been made to rectify the problems.
Possible solution: Inbuild the requirement of fire clearance in the tender itself.Slide53
Chandigarh Notices have been issued.
150 notices were issued in the year 2012.In the past four years only four buildings have been sealed for violation of safety norms.Slide54
Some factsThe Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, empowers the chief fire officer to disconnect water and electric connections of violators.Slide55
According to the West Bengal Fire Services Act, renewal of the NOC every year is mandatory for any establishment that requires fire clearance.
More than 500 beds – Fire officer must be appointed. Slide56
Ruby Hospital, Kolkata was shut in 2008 for violation of fire norms and had to do the modifications.
Tomorrow it can be your hospital………..Slide57
BASICSSlide58
Road AheadNational Building Code.Application of Fire safety provisions & practices.
Plan well.Follow the Law in Letter and Spirit….Slide59
THANK YOU Slide60
Prof A K GuptaDr Shweta
TalatiDr Ranjit Bhogal
Mr
Rajesh, Fire Officer
Mr
P C Sharma, CSO
THANK YOU