PDF-Arguments The rubric includes 36 skills and 8 every grade level The us

TEognitive Skills Standards AlignmentTextual CCSSELALITERACYRLx2CCSSELALITERACYRIx2Point of ViewPurposeAnalyzing the point of view or purpose of a character narrator andor authorspeaker and how. The corrected rubric can be accessed on the ELPA webpage wwwmichigangovelpa or at httpwwwmichigangovdocuments mdeWRITINGSPEAKINGRUBRICS3650307pdf 5743157445 574415745657455574525745557447574495746657445 574465745557458 574415745457465 5744357455574 Chaffins. Director of Gifted Education. Allen County ESC. j. udy.chaffins@allencountyesc.org. 419-222-1836. Critical Thinking SLO and Assessment. The most fundamental concept of critical thinking is simple and intuitive. All humans think. It is our nature to do so. But much of our thinking, left to itself, is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed, or down-right prejudiced. Unfortunately shoddy thinking is costly, both in money and in quality of life. Critical thinking begins, then, when we start . Standards - Based Grading and Reporting. 2012-13. The purpose of a grade is to communicate progress and achievement to parents and students. Standards-Based Grading and Reporting (SBGR) gives a clear picture of academic achievement aligned to the content standards (What students need to know and be able to do at their grade level). Elisa Palmer. edTPA. Coordinator, Illinois State University. December 2014. “Understanding the Rubric Level Progressions” Guides. Detail what each level of each rubric means. Can be shared with any individuals involved in . The Rubric for End of Course Assessments. 2010-2011. Alternate Performance Based Assessment-The Rubric. Students with disabilities must participate in the state End of Course (EOC) assessment. These students must receive appropriate support and accommodations with the goal of mastering course content and passing the EOC assessment. However, a student on an active IEP whose disability interferes with performance on the EOC assessment may demonstrate mastery of core knowledge and skills for that course through the approved alternative performance based assessment.. KY Writing Project Conference. September 2015. 1. carol.franks@education.ky.gov. rebecca.woosley@education.ky.gov. Sit with your grade level. . Our Targets. I . can design a quality rubric congruent to expectations of grade level standards. Dannelle D. Stevens, Professor Emerita. Graduate School of Education, Portland State University. Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York. September 23, 2016. 1. Introductions. Your name. Department or program. May 19, 2010. Agenda:. Review of Syllabi and CV submissions. Rubrics. Clear Communication . Agenda. Review of Syllabi and CV submissions. Crossover Courses – Why so shy?. Rubrics – Connecting evaluation dots. All measures are . supported through . evidence.. Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System. Self-Reflection. Professional Growth. Peer. . Observation. Observation. Peer Observation. Student Voice. at Grade Level. Presentation to the Saskatchewan Principals’ Short Course. July 5, 2017. Background. ESSP Outcome. By June 30, 2020, 80% of students will be at or above grade level in reading, writing, and math.. Navarro, Moos. Our Challenge:. Teachers have observed that . students seem to be more driven by task completion and grades. . rather than. a drive to learn skills and be prepared to participate in an ever-changing world. . Day 2. Jennifer Throndsen, PreK-12 Literacy and Library Media Coordinator. Sara Wiebke, K-3 Literacy Specialist. Overview of Day 2. Writing Collection Project . Scoring Samples. Sorting Students into Instructional Groups to Plan Instruction. Planning a Way to Success. Outcomes. Review & Reflect on the Data: Reading & Math Inventory/Georgia Milestones. Set a SMART Goal!. Plan a Way to Success – . Resources to Support . progress at . Science sample growth goal. This school year, all of my sixth grade students will demonstrate measurable growth in their ability to apply the scientific practices. 100% of my students will improve by 2 or more levels on the district’s science rubric in the areas of engaging in argument from evidence and obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information. 85% of students will perform at level four on the 5-point science rubric. .